Cargando…
Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers
To avoid exposure to SARS‐COV‐2, healthcare professionals must use personal protective equipment (PPE). Their use has been related to a series of adverse effects; the most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspnoea, and pressure injuries. Skin adverse effects are very common, including contact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35306721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.15460 |
_version_ | 1784709312352878592 |
---|---|
author | Proietti, Ilaria Borrelli, Ivan Skroza, Nevena Santoro, Paolo Emilio Gualano, Maria Rosaria Bernardini, Nicoletta Mambrin, Alessandra Tolino, Ersilia Marchesiello, Anna Marraffa, Federica Michelini, Simone Rossi, Giovanni Volpe, Salvatore Ricciardi, Walter Moscato, Umberto Potenza, Concetta |
author_facet | Proietti, Ilaria Borrelli, Ivan Skroza, Nevena Santoro, Paolo Emilio Gualano, Maria Rosaria Bernardini, Nicoletta Mambrin, Alessandra Tolino, Ersilia Marchesiello, Anna Marraffa, Federica Michelini, Simone Rossi, Giovanni Volpe, Salvatore Ricciardi, Walter Moscato, Umberto Potenza, Concetta |
author_sort | Proietti, Ilaria |
collection | PubMed |
description | To avoid exposure to SARS‐COV‐2, healthcare professionals must use personal protective equipment (PPE). Their use has been related to a series of adverse effects; the most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspnoea, and pressure injuries. Skin adverse effects are very common, including contact dermatitis, itching, erythema, and acneiform eruptions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the skin problems caused by personal protection equipment (PPE) in health care workers (HCWs) and to individuate eventual risk factors. From May to June 2020 a retrospective observational multi‐centric study conducted by an online survey sent by email, involving 10 hospital centers, was performed. We considered as independent variables gender and age, occupational group and sector, time of utilization, type and material of PPE. We tested 3 types of PPE: gloves, bonnet, and mask for different time of utilization (<1, 1–3, 3–6, >6 h). We performed a multiple logistic regression model to correlate them with skin adverse events occurrence. Among all the 1184 participants, 292 workers reported a dermatological pathology: 45 (15.41%) had psoriasis, 54 (18.49%) eczema, 38 (13.01%) acne, 48 (16.44%) seborrheic dermatitis, and 107 (36.64%) other. In our sample previous inflammatory dermatological conditions, female sex, prolonged use of PPE were significant risk factors for developing skin related adverse events considering all the PPE considered. The use of PPE is still mandatory in the hospital setting and skin adverse reactions still represent a global problem. Although data from Europe are limited, our study highlighted the importance of the problem of PPE skin reactions in a large sample of Italian healthcare professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9111857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91118572022-05-17 Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers Proietti, Ilaria Borrelli, Ivan Skroza, Nevena Santoro, Paolo Emilio Gualano, Maria Rosaria Bernardini, Nicoletta Mambrin, Alessandra Tolino, Ersilia Marchesiello, Anna Marraffa, Federica Michelini, Simone Rossi, Giovanni Volpe, Salvatore Ricciardi, Walter Moscato, Umberto Potenza, Concetta Dermatol Ther Original Articles To avoid exposure to SARS‐COV‐2, healthcare professionals must use personal protective equipment (PPE). Their use has been related to a series of adverse effects; the most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspnoea, and pressure injuries. Skin adverse effects are very common, including contact dermatitis, itching, erythema, and acneiform eruptions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the skin problems caused by personal protection equipment (PPE) in health care workers (HCWs) and to individuate eventual risk factors. From May to June 2020 a retrospective observational multi‐centric study conducted by an online survey sent by email, involving 10 hospital centers, was performed. We considered as independent variables gender and age, occupational group and sector, time of utilization, type and material of PPE. We tested 3 types of PPE: gloves, bonnet, and mask for different time of utilization (<1, 1–3, 3–6, >6 h). We performed a multiple logistic regression model to correlate them with skin adverse events occurrence. Among all the 1184 participants, 292 workers reported a dermatological pathology: 45 (15.41%) had psoriasis, 54 (18.49%) eczema, 38 (13.01%) acne, 48 (16.44%) seborrheic dermatitis, and 107 (36.64%) other. In our sample previous inflammatory dermatological conditions, female sex, prolonged use of PPE were significant risk factors for developing skin related adverse events considering all the PPE considered. The use of PPE is still mandatory in the hospital setting and skin adverse reactions still represent a global problem. Although data from Europe are limited, our study highlighted the importance of the problem of PPE skin reactions in a large sample of Italian healthcare professionals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-03-23 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9111857/ /pubmed/35306721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.15460 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Dermatologic Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Proietti, Ilaria Borrelli, Ivan Skroza, Nevena Santoro, Paolo Emilio Gualano, Maria Rosaria Bernardini, Nicoletta Mambrin, Alessandra Tolino, Ersilia Marchesiello, Anna Marraffa, Federica Michelini, Simone Rossi, Giovanni Volpe, Salvatore Ricciardi, Walter Moscato, Umberto Potenza, Concetta Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers |
title | Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers |
title_full | Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers |
title_fullStr | Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers |
title_short | Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID‐19 pandemic in Italian health care workers |
title_sort | adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during covid‐19 pandemic in italian health care workers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35306721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.15460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT proiettiilaria adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT borrelliivan adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT skrozanevena adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT santoropaoloemilio adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT gualanomariarosaria adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT bernardininicoletta adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT mambrinalessandra adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT tolinoersilia adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT marchesielloanna adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT marraffafederica adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT michelinisimone adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT rossigiovanni adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT volpesalvatore adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT ricciardiwalter adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT moscatoumberto adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers AT potenzaconcetta adverseskinreactionstopersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemicinitalianhealthcareworkers |