Cargando…

Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions

BACKGROUND: Sars‐CoV‐2 infections are hazardous, especially to the elderly and patients with comorbidities. With no efficient treatment available, newly developed vaccines are the only way to change the course of the pandemic. However, reports of allergic reactions resulted in some patients and prac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romantowski, Jan, Kruszewski, Jerzy, Solarski, Oskar, Bant, Andrzej, Chciałowski, Andrzej, Pietrzyk, Ilona, Sańpruch, Patrycja, Górska, Aleksandra, Chełmińska, Marta, Knurowska, Agata, Gawinowska, Marika, Jassem, Ewa, Niedoszytko, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12152
_version_ 1784709370815184896
author Romantowski, Jan
Kruszewski, Jerzy
Solarski, Oskar
Bant, Andrzej
Chciałowski, Andrzej
Pietrzyk, Ilona
Sańpruch, Patrycja
Górska, Aleksandra
Chełmińska, Marta
Knurowska, Agata
Gawinowska, Marika
Jassem, Ewa
Niedoszytko, Marek
author_facet Romantowski, Jan
Kruszewski, Jerzy
Solarski, Oskar
Bant, Andrzej
Chciałowski, Andrzej
Pietrzyk, Ilona
Sańpruch, Patrycja
Górska, Aleksandra
Chełmińska, Marta
Knurowska, Agata
Gawinowska, Marika
Jassem, Ewa
Niedoszytko, Marek
author_sort Romantowski, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sars‐CoV‐2 infections are hazardous, especially to the elderly and patients with comorbidities. With no efficient treatment available, newly developed vaccines are the only way to change the course of the pandemic. However, reports of allergic reactions resulted in some patients and practicing physicians being concerned about the safety of vaccine administration, particularly in people with severe anaphylactic reactions to multiple or unknown factors in their medical history. This study aimed to develop an allergic work‐up protocol based on skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal testing (IDT) and intramuscular provocations, and desensitisation which may contribute to diagnosis and management of anti‐COVID‐19 vaccine allergy. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty‐five patients were enrolled. Two hundred and five of them entered the study based on severe anaphylactic reaction to unknown or multiple factors in their medical history which disqualified them for standard treatment. Another 80 patients were enrolled after developing an allergic reaction to the first dose of one such vaccine. In all subjects, SPT and IDT were performed. Serum tryptase was assessed in 79 patients randomly chosen from the study group. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy‐seven patients with negative tests were given a vaccine without complications. Seven patients had positive skin tests. In two cases, tests confirmed Comirnaty allergy, while the other five confirmed solely skin sensitisation with no exposure prior to the study. Six patients with positive tests received titrated challenge using desensitisation protocol with a reasonable tolerance. One patient did not consent to desensitisation and one patient resigned despite negative tests. Overall, 283 (99%) patients were vaccinated using this newly developed protocol. Patients with adverse reactions to the first dose of the vaccine before the study had a significantly lower basal serum tryptase concentration (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Skin tests with anti‐COVID‐19 vaccines are a useful tool in the vaccination protocol. This protocol enables safe immunisation of high‐allergy‐risk patients even in cases of positive skin tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91121962022-05-20 Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions Romantowski, Jan Kruszewski, Jerzy Solarski, Oskar Bant, Andrzej Chciałowski, Andrzej Pietrzyk, Ilona Sańpruch, Patrycja Górska, Aleksandra Chełmińska, Marta Knurowska, Agata Gawinowska, Marika Jassem, Ewa Niedoszytko, Marek Clin Transl Allergy Original Article BACKGROUND: Sars‐CoV‐2 infections are hazardous, especially to the elderly and patients with comorbidities. With no efficient treatment available, newly developed vaccines are the only way to change the course of the pandemic. However, reports of allergic reactions resulted in some patients and practicing physicians being concerned about the safety of vaccine administration, particularly in people with severe anaphylactic reactions to multiple or unknown factors in their medical history. This study aimed to develop an allergic work‐up protocol based on skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal testing (IDT) and intramuscular provocations, and desensitisation which may contribute to diagnosis and management of anti‐COVID‐19 vaccine allergy. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty‐five patients were enrolled. Two hundred and five of them entered the study based on severe anaphylactic reaction to unknown or multiple factors in their medical history which disqualified them for standard treatment. Another 80 patients were enrolled after developing an allergic reaction to the first dose of one such vaccine. In all subjects, SPT and IDT were performed. Serum tryptase was assessed in 79 patients randomly chosen from the study group. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy‐seven patients with negative tests were given a vaccine without complications. Seven patients had positive skin tests. In two cases, tests confirmed Comirnaty allergy, while the other five confirmed solely skin sensitisation with no exposure prior to the study. Six patients with positive tests received titrated challenge using desensitisation protocol with a reasonable tolerance. One patient did not consent to desensitisation and one patient resigned despite negative tests. Overall, 283 (99%) patients were vaccinated using this newly developed protocol. Patients with adverse reactions to the first dose of the vaccine before the study had a significantly lower basal serum tryptase concentration (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Skin tests with anti‐COVID‐19 vaccines are a useful tool in the vaccination protocol. This protocol enables safe immunisation of high‐allergy‐risk patients even in cases of positive skin tests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9112196/ /pubmed/35601631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12152 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Romantowski, Jan
Kruszewski, Jerzy
Solarski, Oskar
Bant, Andrzej
Chciałowski, Andrzej
Pietrzyk, Ilona
Sańpruch, Patrycja
Górska, Aleksandra
Chełmińska, Marta
Knurowska, Agata
Gawinowska, Marika
Jassem, Ewa
Niedoszytko, Marek
Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
title Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
title_full Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
title_fullStr Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
title_full_unstemmed Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
title_short Protocol of safe vaccination against COVID‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
title_sort protocol of safe vaccination against covid‐19 in patients with high risk of allergic reactions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12152
work_keys_str_mv AT romantowskijan protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT kruszewskijerzy protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT solarskioskar protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT bantandrzej protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT chciałowskiandrzej protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT pietrzykilona protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT sanpruchpatrycja protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT gorskaaleksandra protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT chełminskamarta protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT knurowskaagata protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT gawinowskamarika protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT jassemewa protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions
AT niedoszytkomarek protocolofsafevaccinationagainstcovid19inpatientswithhighriskofallergicreactions