Cargando…

Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?

BACKGROUND: Various clinical outcome scores have been described to evaluate postoperative shoulder function after operatively treated acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability. Clinical outcome scores can be divided between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examiner-dependent outcome mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dey Hazra, Rony-Orijit, Blach, Robert Maximillian, Ziert, Yvonne, Ellwein, Alexander, Warnhoff, Mara, Hanhoff, Marek, Lill, Helmut, Jensen, Gunnar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221094056
_version_ 1784709411775709184
author Dey Hazra, Rony-Orijit
Blach, Robert Maximillian
Ziert, Yvonne
Ellwein, Alexander
Warnhoff, Mara
Hanhoff, Marek
Lill, Helmut
Jensen, Gunnar
author_facet Dey Hazra, Rony-Orijit
Blach, Robert Maximillian
Ziert, Yvonne
Ellwein, Alexander
Warnhoff, Mara
Hanhoff, Marek
Lill, Helmut
Jensen, Gunnar
author_sort Dey Hazra, Rony-Orijit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various clinical outcome scores have been described to evaluate postoperative shoulder function after operatively treated acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability. Clinical outcome scores can be divided between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examiner-dependent outcome measures (EDOMs) after a clinical examination by a physician. The correlation between PROMs and EDOMs, and thus their interchangeability with regard to operatively treated ACJ instability, has not yet been evaluated. PURPOSE: To investigate whether PROMs are a reasonable substitute for EDOMs. Correlations between global shoulder (GS) and ACJ-specific outcome measures were also investigated. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included in this study were 131 consecutive patients with operatively treated ACJ instability between 2011 and 2017. Postoperative shoulder function was measured using PROMs, including the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test, and Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), and EDOMs, including the Constant-Murley score (CMS), Taft score, ACJ instability (ACJI) score, and SICK Scapula Score (SSS). Associations between PROM and EDOM scores were calculated using the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients for linear and nonlinear variables, respectively, and were interpreted using the Cohen classification. The scores were further stratified into GS versus ACJ-specific measures. RESULTS: A strong correlation was observed between several PROMs and EDOMs (CMS vs SSV [r = 0.59; P = .02] and CMS vs NCS [r = 0.79; P ≤ .001]) and between several GS and ACJ-specific scores (CMS vs NCS; CMS vs ACJI [rs = 0.69; P < .001]; and CMS vs SSS [r = –0.68; P < .001]). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, PROMs such as the SSV (a GS measure) and the NCS (an ACJ-specific measure) can substitute for EDOMs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PROMs that can be substituted for EDOMs can enable the conduct of clinical studies in circumstances in which in-person clinical follow-up of the patient by a physician is not possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91124192022-05-18 Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries? Dey Hazra, Rony-Orijit Blach, Robert Maximillian Ziert, Yvonne Ellwein, Alexander Warnhoff, Mara Hanhoff, Marek Lill, Helmut Jensen, Gunnar Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Various clinical outcome scores have been described to evaluate postoperative shoulder function after operatively treated acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability. Clinical outcome scores can be divided between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examiner-dependent outcome measures (EDOMs) after a clinical examination by a physician. The correlation between PROMs and EDOMs, and thus their interchangeability with regard to operatively treated ACJ instability, has not yet been evaluated. PURPOSE: To investigate whether PROMs are a reasonable substitute for EDOMs. Correlations between global shoulder (GS) and ACJ-specific outcome measures were also investigated. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included in this study were 131 consecutive patients with operatively treated ACJ instability between 2011 and 2017. Postoperative shoulder function was measured using PROMs, including the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test, and Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), and EDOMs, including the Constant-Murley score (CMS), Taft score, ACJ instability (ACJI) score, and SICK Scapula Score (SSS). Associations between PROM and EDOM scores were calculated using the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients for linear and nonlinear variables, respectively, and were interpreted using the Cohen classification. The scores were further stratified into GS versus ACJ-specific measures. RESULTS: A strong correlation was observed between several PROMs and EDOMs (CMS vs SSV [r = 0.59; P = .02] and CMS vs NCS [r = 0.79; P ≤ .001]) and between several GS and ACJ-specific scores (CMS vs NCS; CMS vs ACJI [rs = 0.69; P < .001]; and CMS vs SSS [r = –0.68; P < .001]). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, PROMs such as the SSV (a GS measure) and the NCS (an ACJ-specific measure) can substitute for EDOMs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PROMs that can be substituted for EDOMs can enable the conduct of clinical studies in circumstances in which in-person clinical follow-up of the patient by a physician is not possible. SAGE Publications 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9112419/ /pubmed/35592016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221094056 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Dey Hazra, Rony-Orijit
Blach, Robert Maximillian
Ziert, Yvonne
Ellwein, Alexander
Warnhoff, Mara
Hanhoff, Marek
Lill, Helmut
Jensen, Gunnar
Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?
title Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?
title_full Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?
title_fullStr Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?
title_full_unstemmed Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?
title_short Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?
title_sort are patient-reported outcome scores a reasonable substitute for clinical follow-up after surgically managed acromioclavicular joint injuries?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221094056
work_keys_str_mv AT deyhazraronyorijit arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT blachrobertmaximillian arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT ziertyvonne arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT ellweinalexander arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT warnhoffmara arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT hanhoffmarek arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT lillhelmut arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries
AT jensengunnar arepatientreportedoutcomescoresareasonablesubstituteforclinicalfollowupaftersurgicallymanagedacromioclavicularjointinjuries