Cargando…
Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences
BACKGROUND: Phase 1 drug trials are popular treatment options for patients with advanced disease, despite the greater levels of uncertainty associated with them. However, their meaning and consequences for patient-participants remains under-explored. This review synthesises the qualitative evidence...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9 |
_version_ | 1784709436440313856 |
---|---|
author | Escritt, Kate Mann, Mala Nelson, Annmarie Harrop, Emily |
author_facet | Escritt, Kate Mann, Mala Nelson, Annmarie Harrop, Emily |
author_sort | Escritt, Kate |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phase 1 drug trials are popular treatment options for patients with advanced disease, despite the greater levels of uncertainty associated with them. However, their meaning and consequences for patient-participants remains under-explored. This review synthesises the qualitative evidence of patients’ experiences of participating in phase 1 oncology trials, exploring their decisions to take part and the impacts of these trials on patient wellbeing. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search involving medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords was undertaken in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL, with supplementary searches also conducted. Studies were independently screened for inclusion by two researchers. Included studies were critically appraised and data extracted using standardised forms. Qualitative results were analysed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified across 13 studies: decision-making and joining the trial; experiences of taking part in the trial and hope and coping. Patients primarily joined trials hoping for therapeutic benefits, sentiments which prevailed and shaped their experiences across their trial journey. Rather than indicate therapeutic misconception based on poor understanding, patient perspectives more commonly pointed to differences between hope and expectation and cultural narratives of staying positive, trying everything and trusting in experts. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge information-based models of consent, favouring coping frameworks which account for the role of hope and meaning-making during serious illness. Personalised consideration of existential and quality-of-life matters before and during trials is recommended, including palliative and supportive care alternatives to active treatment. REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review was registered with PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD 42020163250). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9112562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91125622022-05-18 Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences Escritt, Kate Mann, Mala Nelson, Annmarie Harrop, Emily Trials Review BACKGROUND: Phase 1 drug trials are popular treatment options for patients with advanced disease, despite the greater levels of uncertainty associated with them. However, their meaning and consequences for patient-participants remains under-explored. This review synthesises the qualitative evidence of patients’ experiences of participating in phase 1 oncology trials, exploring their decisions to take part and the impacts of these trials on patient wellbeing. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search involving medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords was undertaken in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL, with supplementary searches also conducted. Studies were independently screened for inclusion by two researchers. Included studies were critically appraised and data extracted using standardised forms. Qualitative results were analysed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified across 13 studies: decision-making and joining the trial; experiences of taking part in the trial and hope and coping. Patients primarily joined trials hoping for therapeutic benefits, sentiments which prevailed and shaped their experiences across their trial journey. Rather than indicate therapeutic misconception based on poor understanding, patient perspectives more commonly pointed to differences between hope and expectation and cultural narratives of staying positive, trying everything and trusting in experts. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge information-based models of consent, favouring coping frameworks which account for the role of hope and meaning-making during serious illness. Personalised consideration of existential and quality-of-life matters before and during trials is recommended, including palliative and supportive care alternatives to active treatment. REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review was registered with PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD 42020163250). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9. BioMed Central 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9112562/ /pubmed/35578308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Escritt, Kate Mann, Mala Nelson, Annmarie Harrop, Emily Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
title | Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
title_full | Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
title_fullStr | Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
title_short | Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
title_sort | hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT escrittkate hopeandmeaningmakinginphase1oncologytrialsasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeevidenceonpatientparticipantexperiences AT mannmala hopeandmeaningmakinginphase1oncologytrialsasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeevidenceonpatientparticipantexperiences AT nelsonannmarie hopeandmeaningmakinginphase1oncologytrialsasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeevidenceonpatientparticipantexperiences AT harropemily hopeandmeaningmakinginphase1oncologytrialsasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeevidenceonpatientparticipantexperiences |