Cargando…
The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
BACKGROUND: The acute management of lateral patellar dislocations (LPD) typically consists of placing the patient in a knee immobilizer for 2 to 6 weeks, but it is not clear on how long these patients should be immobilized, if at all. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare outco...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00439 |
_version_ | 1784709469363503104 |
---|---|
author | Purcell, Nicholas McKay, Scott Saloom, Adam Mitchell, Katy |
author_facet | Purcell, Nicholas McKay, Scott Saloom, Adam Mitchell, Katy |
author_sort | Purcell, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The acute management of lateral patellar dislocations (LPD) typically consists of placing the patient in a knee immobilizer for 2 to 6 weeks, but it is not clear on how long these patients should be immobilized, if at all. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for patients following a rehabilitation protocol that is initiated with or without a short period of immobilization after sustaining a LPD. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective study was performed at a children’s hospital which included patients <18 years of age (mean = 14.22) diagnosed with LPD (<10 days). A total of 18 (14 females, 4 males) patients diagnosed with LPD were consented and enrolled in the study (Early ROM group = 11, Immobilization group = 7). Inclusion criteria for the study was history of knee instability, effusion or history of effusion, and (+) apprehension. Subjects were followed for 4 weeks and the following outcomes were assessed: knee ROM, isokinetic strength, Kujala, Pedi-IKDC, and Y balance scores. Split-plot (2x2) ANOVAs were conducted for each of the dependent variables with an alpha level set at .05 for the global tests and independent t-tests were run at baseline and 4 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Knee flexion ROM showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.012). Pedi-IKDC showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.026). When comparing groups at 4 weeks, the early ROM group had significantly better scores in both the Kujala (means for both groups: 76.78 and 52.67), p=.049)), and the Pedi-IKDC (means for both groups: 68.85 and 40.88), p=.025)). There were no significant differences in isokinetic strength measures between the groups except for affected side knee flexion at 60 degrees/sec (p=.039) with the early ROM demonstrating higher strength. In addition, the affected side composite Y-balance scores were significantly better for the early ROM group (as compared to the immobilization group) at p=.031. CONCLUSION: Patients that underwent early ROM following LPD scored significantly better across patient derived outcome measures and functional outcomes at 4 weeks following the initial physical therapy evaluation when compared to a group that underwent a 2 week period of immobilization. Future studies should analyze longer term comparisons between groups to determine if this short term difference leads to long term differences or improved re-injury rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9112771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91127712022-05-18 The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial Purcell, Nicholas McKay, Scott Saloom, Adam Mitchell, Katy Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The acute management of lateral patellar dislocations (LPD) typically consists of placing the patient in a knee immobilizer for 2 to 6 weeks, but it is not clear on how long these patients should be immobilized, if at all. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for patients following a rehabilitation protocol that is initiated with or without a short period of immobilization after sustaining a LPD. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective study was performed at a children’s hospital which included patients <18 years of age (mean = 14.22) diagnosed with LPD (<10 days). A total of 18 (14 females, 4 males) patients diagnosed with LPD were consented and enrolled in the study (Early ROM group = 11, Immobilization group = 7). Inclusion criteria for the study was history of knee instability, effusion or history of effusion, and (+) apprehension. Subjects were followed for 4 weeks and the following outcomes were assessed: knee ROM, isokinetic strength, Kujala, Pedi-IKDC, and Y balance scores. Split-plot (2x2) ANOVAs were conducted for each of the dependent variables with an alpha level set at .05 for the global tests and independent t-tests were run at baseline and 4 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Knee flexion ROM showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.012). Pedi-IKDC showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.026). When comparing groups at 4 weeks, the early ROM group had significantly better scores in both the Kujala (means for both groups: 76.78 and 52.67), p=.049)), and the Pedi-IKDC (means for both groups: 68.85 and 40.88), p=.025)). There were no significant differences in isokinetic strength measures between the groups except for affected side knee flexion at 60 degrees/sec (p=.039) with the early ROM demonstrating higher strength. In addition, the affected side composite Y-balance scores were significantly better for the early ROM group (as compared to the immobilization group) at p=.031. CONCLUSION: Patients that underwent early ROM following LPD scored significantly better across patient derived outcome measures and functional outcomes at 4 weeks following the initial physical therapy evaluation when compared to a group that underwent a 2 week period of immobilization. Future studies should analyze longer term comparisons between groups to determine if this short term difference leads to long term differences or improved re-injury rates. SAGE Publications 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9112771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00439 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Purcell, Nicholas McKay, Scott Saloom, Adam Mitchell, Katy The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial |
title | The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial |
title_full | The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial |
title_short | The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial |
title_sort | effects of early range of motion versus immobilization following acute first-time lateral patellar instability episode: randomized control trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purcellnicholas theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT mckayscott theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT saloomadam theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT mitchellkaty theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT purcellnicholas effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT mckayscott effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT saloomadam effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial AT mitchellkaty effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial |