Cargando…

The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND: The acute management of lateral patellar dislocations (LPD) typically consists of placing the patient in a knee immobilizer for 2 to 6 weeks, but it is not clear on how long these patients should be immobilized, if at all. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare outco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purcell, Nicholas, McKay, Scott, Saloom, Adam, Mitchell, Katy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112771/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00439
_version_ 1784709469363503104
author Purcell, Nicholas
McKay, Scott
Saloom, Adam
Mitchell, Katy
author_facet Purcell, Nicholas
McKay, Scott
Saloom, Adam
Mitchell, Katy
author_sort Purcell, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The acute management of lateral patellar dislocations (LPD) typically consists of placing the patient in a knee immobilizer for 2 to 6 weeks, but it is not clear on how long these patients should be immobilized, if at all. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for patients following a rehabilitation protocol that is initiated with or without a short period of immobilization after sustaining a LPD. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective study was performed at a children’s hospital which included patients <18 years of age (mean = 14.22) diagnosed with LPD (<10 days). A total of 18 (14 females, 4 males) patients diagnosed with LPD were consented and enrolled in the study (Early ROM group = 11, Immobilization group = 7). Inclusion criteria for the study was history of knee instability, effusion or history of effusion, and (+) apprehension. Subjects were followed for 4 weeks and the following outcomes were assessed: knee ROM, isokinetic strength, Kujala, Pedi-IKDC, and Y balance scores. Split-plot (2x2) ANOVAs were conducted for each of the dependent variables with an alpha level set at .05 for the global tests and independent t-tests were run at baseline and 4 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Knee flexion ROM showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.012). Pedi-IKDC showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.026). When comparing groups at 4 weeks, the early ROM group had significantly better scores in both the Kujala (means for both groups: 76.78 and 52.67), p=.049)), and the Pedi-IKDC (means for both groups: 68.85 and 40.88), p=.025)). There were no significant differences in isokinetic strength measures between the groups except for affected side knee flexion at 60 degrees/sec (p=.039) with the early ROM demonstrating higher strength. In addition, the affected side composite Y-balance scores were significantly better for the early ROM group (as compared to the immobilization group) at p=.031. CONCLUSION: Patients that underwent early ROM following LPD scored significantly better across patient derived outcome measures and functional outcomes at 4 weeks following the initial physical therapy evaluation when compared to a group that underwent a 2 week period of immobilization. Future studies should analyze longer term comparisons between groups to determine if this short term difference leads to long term differences or improved re-injury rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91127712022-05-18 The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial Purcell, Nicholas McKay, Scott Saloom, Adam Mitchell, Katy Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The acute management of lateral patellar dislocations (LPD) typically consists of placing the patient in a knee immobilizer for 2 to 6 weeks, but it is not clear on how long these patients should be immobilized, if at all. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for patients following a rehabilitation protocol that is initiated with or without a short period of immobilization after sustaining a LPD. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective study was performed at a children’s hospital which included patients <18 years of age (mean = 14.22) diagnosed with LPD (<10 days). A total of 18 (14 females, 4 males) patients diagnosed with LPD were consented and enrolled in the study (Early ROM group = 11, Immobilization group = 7). Inclusion criteria for the study was history of knee instability, effusion or history of effusion, and (+) apprehension. Subjects were followed for 4 weeks and the following outcomes were assessed: knee ROM, isokinetic strength, Kujala, Pedi-IKDC, and Y balance scores. Split-plot (2x2) ANOVAs were conducted for each of the dependent variables with an alpha level set at .05 for the global tests and independent t-tests were run at baseline and 4 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Knee flexion ROM showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.012). Pedi-IKDC showed a significant main effect of time (p≤.0005) and group (p=.026). When comparing groups at 4 weeks, the early ROM group had significantly better scores in both the Kujala (means for both groups: 76.78 and 52.67), p=.049)), and the Pedi-IKDC (means for both groups: 68.85 and 40.88), p=.025)). There were no significant differences in isokinetic strength measures between the groups except for affected side knee flexion at 60 degrees/sec (p=.039) with the early ROM demonstrating higher strength. In addition, the affected side composite Y-balance scores were significantly better for the early ROM group (as compared to the immobilization group) at p=.031. CONCLUSION: Patients that underwent early ROM following LPD scored significantly better across patient derived outcome measures and functional outcomes at 4 weeks following the initial physical therapy evaluation when compared to a group that underwent a 2 week period of immobilization. Future studies should analyze longer term comparisons between groups to determine if this short term difference leads to long term differences or improved re-injury rates. SAGE Publications 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9112771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00439 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Purcell, Nicholas
McKay, Scott
Saloom, Adam
Mitchell, Katy
The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
title The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
title_full The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
title_fullStr The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
title_short The Effects of Early Range of Motion Versus Immobilization Following Acute First-Time Lateral Patellar Instability Episode: Randomized Control Trial
title_sort effects of early range of motion versus immobilization following acute first-time lateral patellar instability episode: randomized control trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112771/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00439
work_keys_str_mv AT purcellnicholas theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT mckayscott theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT saloomadam theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT mitchellkaty theeffectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT purcellnicholas effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT mckayscott effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT saloomadam effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial
AT mitchellkaty effectsofearlyrangeofmotionversusimmobilizationfollowingacutefirsttimelateralpatellarinstabilityepisoderandomizedcontroltrial