Cargando…

Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the effect of swim-up (SU) and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) on sperm survival and DNA fragmentation. METHODS: Individual semen samples were analyzed before each was divided into two aliquots (half for SU and half for DGC) for calculation of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Minh Tam, Dang, Hong Nhan Thi, Nguyen, Trung Van, Nguyen, Thai Thanh Thi, Nguyen, Quoc Huy Vu, Cao, Ngoc Thanh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221097492
_version_ 1784709470133157888
author Le, Minh Tam
Dang, Hong Nhan Thi
Nguyen, Trung Van
Nguyen, Thai Thanh Thi
Nguyen, Quoc Huy Vu
Cao, Ngoc Thanh
author_facet Le, Minh Tam
Dang, Hong Nhan Thi
Nguyen, Trung Van
Nguyen, Thai Thanh Thi
Nguyen, Quoc Huy Vu
Cao, Ngoc Thanh
author_sort Le, Minh Tam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the effect of swim-up (SU) and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) on sperm survival and DNA fragmentation. METHODS: Individual semen samples were analyzed before each was divided into two aliquots (half for SU and half for DGC) for calculation of sperm survival and the DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Sperm DNA fragmentation was determined using the sperm chromatin dispersion test. RESULTS: The DFI of the 63 semen samples processed using both procedures was lower than that of the fresh semen samples. The DFI was significantly lower for samples processed using the SU than DGC method. In the sperm survival test, the SU technique was associated with increased sperm motility and vitality following preparation. After 24 hours, however, the concentration and percentage of surviving sperm were significantly lower in the SU than DGC group. CONCLUSIONS: Both semen preparation techniques help to minimize sperm DNA fragmentation; however, when the DFI is <30%, the SU technique is more appropriate than DGC. While DGC may be superior for intrauterine insemination, the SU method may be preferable for in vitro fertilization or maturation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91127742022-05-18 Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation Le, Minh Tam Dang, Hong Nhan Thi Nguyen, Trung Van Nguyen, Thai Thanh Thi Nguyen, Quoc Huy Vu Cao, Ngoc Thanh J Int Med Res Pre-Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the effect of swim-up (SU) and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) on sperm survival and DNA fragmentation. METHODS: Individual semen samples were analyzed before each was divided into two aliquots (half for SU and half for DGC) for calculation of sperm survival and the DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Sperm DNA fragmentation was determined using the sperm chromatin dispersion test. RESULTS: The DFI of the 63 semen samples processed using both procedures was lower than that of the fresh semen samples. The DFI was significantly lower for samples processed using the SU than DGC method. In the sperm survival test, the SU technique was associated with increased sperm motility and vitality following preparation. After 24 hours, however, the concentration and percentage of surviving sperm were significantly lower in the SU than DGC group. CONCLUSIONS: Both semen preparation techniques help to minimize sperm DNA fragmentation; however, when the DFI is <30%, the SU technique is more appropriate than DGC. While DGC may be superior for intrauterine insemination, the SU method may be preferable for in vitro fertilization or maturation. SAGE Publications 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9112774/ /pubmed/35545843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221097492 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Pre-Clinical Research Report
Le, Minh Tam
Dang, Hong Nhan Thi
Nguyen, Trung Van
Nguyen, Thai Thanh Thi
Nguyen, Quoc Huy Vu
Cao, Ngoc Thanh
Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation
title Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation
title_full Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation
title_fullStr Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation
title_full_unstemmed Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation
title_short Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation
title_sort effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and dna fragmentation
topic Pre-Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221097492
work_keys_str_mv AT leminhtam effectsofspermpreparationtechniquesonspermsurvivabilityanddnafragmentation
AT danghongnhanthi effectsofspermpreparationtechniquesonspermsurvivabilityanddnafragmentation
AT nguyentrungvan effectsofspermpreparationtechniquesonspermsurvivabilityanddnafragmentation
AT nguyenthaithanhthi effectsofspermpreparationtechniquesonspermsurvivabilityanddnafragmentation
AT nguyenquochuyvu effectsofspermpreparationtechniquesonspermsurvivabilityanddnafragmentation
AT caongocthanh effectsofspermpreparationtechniquesonspermsurvivabilityanddnafragmentation