Cargando…

Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool

PURPOSE: The SPUR (Social, Psychological, Usage and Rational) Adherence Profiling Tool is a recently developed adaptive instrument for assessing key patient-level drivers for non-adherence. This study describes the SPUR questionnaire’s finalization and psychometric evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bock, Elodie, Dolgin, Kevin, Kombargi, Léa, Arnould, Benoit, Vilcot, Tanguy, Hubert, Guillaume, Laporte, Marie-Eve, Nabec, Lydiane, Reach, Gérard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592773
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S354705
_version_ 1784709475812245504
author de Bock, Elodie
Dolgin, Kevin
Kombargi, Léa
Arnould, Benoit
Vilcot, Tanguy
Hubert, Guillaume
Laporte, Marie-Eve
Nabec, Lydiane
Reach, Gérard
author_facet de Bock, Elodie
Dolgin, Kevin
Kombargi, Léa
Arnould, Benoit
Vilcot, Tanguy
Hubert, Guillaume
Laporte, Marie-Eve
Nabec, Lydiane
Reach, Gérard
author_sort de Bock, Elodie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The SPUR (Social, Psychological, Usage and Rational) Adherence Profiling Tool is a recently developed adaptive instrument for assessing key patient-level drivers for non-adherence. This study describes the SPUR questionnaire’s finalization and psychometric evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected through an online survey among patients with type 2 diabetes included by general practitioners and diabetologists in France. The survey included four questionnaires, SPUR and three validated adherence measures: BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT. Item-level analysis and a partial credit model (PCM) were performed to refine the response option coding of SPUR items. The final item selection of SPUR was defined using a PCM and a principal component analysis (PCA). Construct validity, concurrent validity and known-groups validity were assessed on the final SPUR questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients (55% men, mean age of 63 years) completed the survey remotely and were included in this analysis. Refining response option coding allowed a better discrimination of patients on the latent trait. After item selection, a short, an intermediate, and a long form composed the final SPUR questionnaire. The short form will be used to screen patients for risk and then the other forms will allow the collection of further information to refine the risk assessment and decide the best levers for action. Results obtained were supportive of the construct validity of the forms. Their concurrent validity was demonstrated: moderate to high significant correlations were obtained with BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT scores. Their known-groups validity were shown with a logical pattern of higher scores obtained for patients considered non-adherent and significant differences between the scores obtained for patients considered adherent versus non-adherent. CONCLUSION: SPUR is a valid tool to evaluate the risk of non-adherence of patients, allowing effective intervention by providing insights into the respective individual reasons for lack of adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91127972022-05-18 Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool de Bock, Elodie Dolgin, Kevin Kombargi, Léa Arnould, Benoit Vilcot, Tanguy Hubert, Guillaume Laporte, Marie-Eve Nabec, Lydiane Reach, Gérard Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: The SPUR (Social, Psychological, Usage and Rational) Adherence Profiling Tool is a recently developed adaptive instrument for assessing key patient-level drivers for non-adherence. This study describes the SPUR questionnaire’s finalization and psychometric evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected through an online survey among patients with type 2 diabetes included by general practitioners and diabetologists in France. The survey included four questionnaires, SPUR and three validated adherence measures: BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT. Item-level analysis and a partial credit model (PCM) were performed to refine the response option coding of SPUR items. The final item selection of SPUR was defined using a PCM and a principal component analysis (PCA). Construct validity, concurrent validity and known-groups validity were assessed on the final SPUR questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients (55% men, mean age of 63 years) completed the survey remotely and were included in this analysis. Refining response option coding allowed a better discrimination of patients on the latent trait. After item selection, a short, an intermediate, and a long form composed the final SPUR questionnaire. The short form will be used to screen patients for risk and then the other forms will allow the collection of further information to refine the risk assessment and decide the best levers for action. Results obtained were supportive of the construct validity of the forms. Their concurrent validity was demonstrated: moderate to high significant correlations were obtained with BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT scores. Their known-groups validity were shown with a logical pattern of higher scores obtained for patients considered non-adherent and significant differences between the scores obtained for patients considered adherent versus non-adherent. CONCLUSION: SPUR is a valid tool to evaluate the risk of non-adherence of patients, allowing effective intervention by providing insights into the respective individual reasons for lack of adherence. Dove 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9112797/ /pubmed/35592773 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S354705 Text en © 2022 de Bock et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
de Bock, Elodie
Dolgin, Kevin
Kombargi, Léa
Arnould, Benoit
Vilcot, Tanguy
Hubert, Guillaume
Laporte, Marie-Eve
Nabec, Lydiane
Reach, Gérard
Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool
title Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool
title_full Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool
title_fullStr Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool
title_full_unstemmed Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool
title_short Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool
title_sort finalization and validation of questionnaire and algorithm of spur, a new adherence profiling tool
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592773
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S354705
work_keys_str_mv AT debockelodie finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT dolginkevin finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT kombargilea finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT arnouldbenoit finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT vilcottanguy finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT hubertguillaume finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT laportemarieeve finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT nabeclydiane finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool
AT reachgerard finalizationandvalidationofquestionnaireandalgorithmofspuranewadherenceprofilingtool