Cargando…

The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Avulsion fractures of the pelvis and hip are common injuries in adolescent patients. Avulsion sites include the rectus femoris at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), the sartorius at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), the hamstrings at the ischial tuberosity, abdominal muscl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Block, Andrew M., Oladeji, Afolayan K., Carsen, Sasha, Crepeau, Allison, Ellis, Henry B., Nepple, Jeffrey J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112819/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00418
_version_ 1784709481042542592
author Block, Andrew M.
Oladeji, Afolayan K.
Carsen, Sasha
Crepeau, Allison
Ellis, Henry B.
Nepple, Jeffrey J.
author_facet Block, Andrew M.
Oladeji, Afolayan K.
Carsen, Sasha
Crepeau, Allison
Ellis, Henry B.
Nepple, Jeffrey J.
author_sort Block, Andrew M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Avulsion fractures of the pelvis and hip are common injuries in adolescent patients. Avulsion sites include the rectus femoris at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), the sartorius at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), the hamstrings at the ischial tuberosity, abdominal muscles on the iliac crest (IC), iliopsoas at the lesser trochanter (LT). Although these fractures are commonly treated conservatively, there is no consensus on the preferred treatment modality (conservative vs. surgical fixation) or thresholds for surgical treatment. The published literature is generally limited to small retrospective series, with in some cases conflicting results. PURPOSE: To summarize the available evidence on outcomes of pelvic and hip avulsion fractures in the pediatric and adolescent population using a systematic review of the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed per PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria included mean patient age of ≤18.0 years, ≥5 patients, avulsions treated with 3 months of injury, and publication in the English language. Patient characteristics, type of activity performed when injured, treatment modality, complications, and outcomes (rates of persistent symptoms, return to sport, subsequent surgery), were recorded by specific fracture type. RESULTS: A total of 1034 patients with acute avulsion fractures from 23 studies were included. Of these, the outcomes were reported in 799 patients, including 693 (86.7%) who underwent conservative treatment and 106 (13.3%) who underwent surgical intervention. All types of acute avulsion fractures had good results with conservative treatment. Ischial tuberosity avulsions had the highest rate of persistent symptoms (25.4%) but only 10.2% underwent subsequent surgery. AIIS avulsions also had a high rate of persistent symptoms (19.3%) but very few underwent subsequent surgery (1.3%). Faster return to sport was noted in conservatively treated patients in ASIS and AIIS avulsions (both p<0.05). While good results have been reported with surgical treatment, conservative treatment of ASIS, AIIS, ischial tuberosity, IC, and LT avulsions appears to be nearly uniformly successful with low rates of persistent symptoms or subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both conservative treatment and surgical treatment of pelvic avulsion injuries appear to be effective for the majority of patients. Ischial tuberosity and AIIS avulsions have the highest rates of persistent symptoms at 25% and 19%, respectively. Further prospective research into all fracture types is needed to better define indications for surgery in a subgroup of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91128192022-05-18 The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Block, Andrew M. Oladeji, Afolayan K. Carsen, Sasha Crepeau, Allison Ellis, Henry B. Nepple, Jeffrey J. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Avulsion fractures of the pelvis and hip are common injuries in adolescent patients. Avulsion sites include the rectus femoris at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), the sartorius at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), the hamstrings at the ischial tuberosity, abdominal muscles on the iliac crest (IC), iliopsoas at the lesser trochanter (LT). Although these fractures are commonly treated conservatively, there is no consensus on the preferred treatment modality (conservative vs. surgical fixation) or thresholds for surgical treatment. The published literature is generally limited to small retrospective series, with in some cases conflicting results. PURPOSE: To summarize the available evidence on outcomes of pelvic and hip avulsion fractures in the pediatric and adolescent population using a systematic review of the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed per PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria included mean patient age of ≤18.0 years, ≥5 patients, avulsions treated with 3 months of injury, and publication in the English language. Patient characteristics, type of activity performed when injured, treatment modality, complications, and outcomes (rates of persistent symptoms, return to sport, subsequent surgery), were recorded by specific fracture type. RESULTS: A total of 1034 patients with acute avulsion fractures from 23 studies were included. Of these, the outcomes were reported in 799 patients, including 693 (86.7%) who underwent conservative treatment and 106 (13.3%) who underwent surgical intervention. All types of acute avulsion fractures had good results with conservative treatment. Ischial tuberosity avulsions had the highest rate of persistent symptoms (25.4%) but only 10.2% underwent subsequent surgery. AIIS avulsions also had a high rate of persistent symptoms (19.3%) but very few underwent subsequent surgery (1.3%). Faster return to sport was noted in conservatively treated patients in ASIS and AIIS avulsions (both p<0.05). While good results have been reported with surgical treatment, conservative treatment of ASIS, AIIS, ischial tuberosity, IC, and LT avulsions appears to be nearly uniformly successful with low rates of persistent symptoms or subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both conservative treatment and surgical treatment of pelvic avulsion injuries appear to be effective for the majority of patients. Ischial tuberosity and AIIS avulsions have the highest rates of persistent symptoms at 25% and 19%, respectively. Further prospective research into all fracture types is needed to better define indications for surgery in a subgroup of patients. SAGE Publications 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9112819/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00418 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Block, Andrew M.
Oladeji, Afolayan K.
Carsen, Sasha
Crepeau, Allison
Ellis, Henry B.
Nepple, Jeffrey J.
The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Pelvic and Hip Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment of pelvic and hip avulsion fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112819/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00418
work_keys_str_mv AT blockandrewm theoutcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oladejiafolayank theoutcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carsensasha theoutcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT crepeauallison theoutcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ellishenryb theoutcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nepplejeffreyj theoutcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blockandrewm outcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oladejiafolayank outcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carsensasha outcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT crepeauallison outcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ellishenryb outcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nepplejeffreyj outcomesofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofpelvicandhipavulsionfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis