Cargando…

POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study

To compare quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography parameters between polypoidal choroidal neovascularizations (PCNVs) and Type 1 choroidal neovascularizations (CNVs) in patients with age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: PCNV and Type 1 CNV lesions were retrospectively recruited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serra, Rita, Coscas, Florence, Cabral, Diogo, Pinna, Antonio, Coscas, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Retina 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35594074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003439
_version_ 1784709501498163200
author Serra, Rita
Coscas, Florence
Cabral, Diogo
Pinna, Antonio
Coscas, Gabriel
author_facet Serra, Rita
Coscas, Florence
Cabral, Diogo
Pinna, Antonio
Coscas, Gabriel
author_sort Serra, Rita
collection PubMed
description To compare quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography parameters between polypoidal choroidal neovascularizations (PCNVs) and Type 1 choroidal neovascularizations (CNVs) in patients with age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: PCNV and Type 1 CNV lesions were retrospectively recruited in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. All the patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT), and optical coherence tomography angiography. Vascular perfusion density, fractal dimension, and lacunarity were computed by means of fractal analysis of neovascular en face optical coherence tomography angiography slabs. RESULTS: Sixty-eight eyes were included in the analysis. Of them, 35 of 68 eyes (51.5%) had PCNV and 33 of 68 (48.5%) had Type 1 CNV. Patients with PCNV were significantly younger (P = 0.0003) and had a higher best-corrected visual acuity (P < 0.0001). The mean vascular perfusion density was 0.83 ± 0.11% in PCNVs and 0.46 ± 0.10% in Type 1 CNVs (P < 0.0001). The mean fractal dimension was 1.44 ± 0.1 in PCNVs and 1.45 ± 0.09 in Type 1 CNVs (P = 0.86) while the mean lacunarity was 2.46 ± 1.03 in PCNVs and 1.86 ± 0.52 in Type 1 CNVs (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: PCNVs resulted to be more heterogeneous and characterized by higher vascular perfusion density and lacunarity values than Type 1 CNVs. These interesting findings seem to support the idea that PCNVs and Type 1 CNVs are two separate clinical entities. However, future studies based on optical coherence tomography angiography fractal analysis, but also involving other relevant parameters such as demographics, presentation, morphology on multimodal imaging, and response to treatment, are necessary before drawing any definitive conclusions on whether PCNV is a specific clinical entity or a neovascular age-related macular degeneration variant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9112963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Retina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91129632022-05-25 POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study Serra, Rita Coscas, Florence Cabral, Diogo Pinna, Antonio Coscas, Gabriel Retina Original Study To compare quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography parameters between polypoidal choroidal neovascularizations (PCNVs) and Type 1 choroidal neovascularizations (CNVs) in patients with age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: PCNV and Type 1 CNV lesions were retrospectively recruited in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. All the patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT), and optical coherence tomography angiography. Vascular perfusion density, fractal dimension, and lacunarity were computed by means of fractal analysis of neovascular en face optical coherence tomography angiography slabs. RESULTS: Sixty-eight eyes were included in the analysis. Of them, 35 of 68 eyes (51.5%) had PCNV and 33 of 68 (48.5%) had Type 1 CNV. Patients with PCNV were significantly younger (P = 0.0003) and had a higher best-corrected visual acuity (P < 0.0001). The mean vascular perfusion density was 0.83 ± 0.11% in PCNVs and 0.46 ± 0.10% in Type 1 CNVs (P < 0.0001). The mean fractal dimension was 1.44 ± 0.1 in PCNVs and 1.45 ± 0.09 in Type 1 CNVs (P = 0.86) while the mean lacunarity was 2.46 ± 1.03 in PCNVs and 1.86 ± 0.52 in Type 1 CNVs (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: PCNVs resulted to be more heterogeneous and characterized by higher vascular perfusion density and lacunarity values than Type 1 CNVs. These interesting findings seem to support the idea that PCNVs and Type 1 CNVs are two separate clinical entities. However, future studies based on optical coherence tomography angiography fractal analysis, but also involving other relevant parameters such as demographics, presentation, morphology on multimodal imaging, and response to treatment, are necessary before drawing any definitive conclusions on whether PCNV is a specific clinical entity or a neovascular age-related macular degeneration variant. Retina 2022-06 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9112963/ /pubmed/35594074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003439 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Opthalmic Communications Society, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Study
Serra, Rita
Coscas, Florence
Cabral, Diogo
Pinna, Antonio
Coscas, Gabriel
POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study
title POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study
title_full POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study
title_fullStr POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study
title_full_unstemmed POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study
title_short POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION VERSUS TYPE 1 CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Fractal Analysis Study
title_sort polypoidal choroidal neovascularization versus type 1 choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: a fractal analysis study
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35594074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003439
work_keys_str_mv AT serrarita polypoidalchoroidalneovascularizationversustype1choroidalneovascularizationinagerelatedmaculardegenerationafractalanalysisstudy
AT coscasflorence polypoidalchoroidalneovascularizationversustype1choroidalneovascularizationinagerelatedmaculardegenerationafractalanalysisstudy
AT cabraldiogo polypoidalchoroidalneovascularizationversustype1choroidalneovascularizationinagerelatedmaculardegenerationafractalanalysisstudy
AT pinnaantonio polypoidalchoroidalneovascularizationversustype1choroidalneovascularizationinagerelatedmaculardegenerationafractalanalysisstudy
AT coscasgabriel polypoidalchoroidalneovascularizationversustype1choroidalneovascularizationinagerelatedmaculardegenerationafractalanalysisstudy