Cargando…

Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China

OBJECTIVE: This manuscript evaluates and tests the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration from the perspectives of individual characteristics and migration characteristics, so as to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the government to issue more effective assista...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Haibo, Li, Haitao, Guo, Shengyu, Fan, Xuelong, Liu, Feiyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.813867
_version_ 1784709527244898304
author Li, Haibo
Li, Haitao
Guo, Shengyu
Fan, Xuelong
Liu, Feiyue
author_facet Li, Haibo
Li, Haitao
Guo, Shengyu
Fan, Xuelong
Liu, Feiyue
author_sort Li, Haibo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This manuscript evaluates and tests the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration from the perspectives of individual characteristics and migration characteristics, so as to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the government to issue more effective assistance policies. METHODS: Multilevel comprehensive evaluation method and Entropy method are used to calculate the urban integration level of migrant workers, and one-way ANOVA and optimal scaling regression are used to test the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration. RESULTS: Based on the questionnaire data of 854 migrant workers in China, the scale of migrant workers’ urban integration has good reliability and validity. The overall level of migrant workers’ urban integration is 49.61% and there exist group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration. The impact of education level, income level, and migration time on migrant workers’ urban integration is significantly positive, whereas the impact of migration distance on migrant workers’ urban integration is significantly negative. The urban integration level of migrant workers who have family members accompanying them is higher than that of migrant workers who have no family members accompanying them. Gender, age, and marriage have no significant impact on migrant workers’ urban integration. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: This study aims to measure and test the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration using ANOVA and optimal scaling regression. However, the shortcomings of this study are the selection of the “migrant workers’ urban integration” scale and the representativeness of the sample used in this study. CONCLUSION: There are group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration with different education levels, income levels, migration distances, migration times, and statuses of family members accompanying. In the policy of promoting migrant workers’ urban integration, we should accurately count the characteristics of migrant workers and give more attention to migrant workers with low education levels, low-income levels, long migration distances, short migration times, and no family accompany.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9113112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91131122022-05-18 Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China Li, Haibo Li, Haitao Guo, Shengyu Fan, Xuelong Liu, Feiyue Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: This manuscript evaluates and tests the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration from the perspectives of individual characteristics and migration characteristics, so as to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the government to issue more effective assistance policies. METHODS: Multilevel comprehensive evaluation method and Entropy method are used to calculate the urban integration level of migrant workers, and one-way ANOVA and optimal scaling regression are used to test the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration. RESULTS: Based on the questionnaire data of 854 migrant workers in China, the scale of migrant workers’ urban integration has good reliability and validity. The overall level of migrant workers’ urban integration is 49.61% and there exist group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration. The impact of education level, income level, and migration time on migrant workers’ urban integration is significantly positive, whereas the impact of migration distance on migrant workers’ urban integration is significantly negative. The urban integration level of migrant workers who have family members accompanying them is higher than that of migrant workers who have no family members accompanying them. Gender, age, and marriage have no significant impact on migrant workers’ urban integration. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: This study aims to measure and test the group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration using ANOVA and optimal scaling regression. However, the shortcomings of this study are the selection of the “migrant workers’ urban integration” scale and the representativeness of the sample used in this study. CONCLUSION: There are group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration with different education levels, income levels, migration distances, migration times, and statuses of family members accompanying. In the policy of promoting migrant workers’ urban integration, we should accurately count the characteristics of migrant workers and give more attention to migrant workers with low education levels, low-income levels, long migration distances, short migration times, and no family accompany. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9113112/ /pubmed/35592865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.813867 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Li, Guo, Fan and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Li, Haibo
Li, Haitao
Guo, Shengyu
Fan, Xuelong
Liu, Feiyue
Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China
title Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China
title_full Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China
title_fullStr Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China
title_full_unstemmed Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China
title_short Study on Group Differences in Migrant Workers’ Urban Integration in China
title_sort study on group differences in migrant workers’ urban integration in china
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.813867
work_keys_str_mv AT lihaibo studyongroupdifferencesinmigrantworkersurbanintegrationinchina
AT lihaitao studyongroupdifferencesinmigrantworkersurbanintegrationinchina
AT guoshengyu studyongroupdifferencesinmigrantworkersurbanintegrationinchina
AT fanxuelong studyongroupdifferencesinmigrantworkersurbanintegrationinchina
AT liufeiyue studyongroupdifferencesinmigrantworkersurbanintegrationinchina