Cargando…
Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
Targeting the BCL-X(L) pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X(L)/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progressi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02188 |
_version_ | 1784709542413598720 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, Claire N. Garcia, Jacqueline S. Somervaille, Tim C.P. Foran, James M. Verstovsek, Srdan Jamieson, Catriona Mesa, Ruben Ritchie, Ellen K. Tantravahi, Srinivas K. Vachhani, Pankit O'Connell, Casey L. Komrokji, Rami S. Harb, Jason Hutti, Jessica E. Holes, Leanne Masud, Abdullah A. Nuthalapati, Silpa Potluri, Jalaja Pemmaraju, Naveen |
author_facet | Harrison, Claire N. Garcia, Jacqueline S. Somervaille, Tim C.P. Foran, James M. Verstovsek, Srdan Jamieson, Catriona Mesa, Ruben Ritchie, Ellen K. Tantravahi, Srinivas K. Vachhani, Pankit O'Connell, Casey L. Komrokji, Rami S. Harb, Jason Hutti, Jessica E. Holes, Leanne Masud, Abdullah A. Nuthalapati, Silpa Potluri, Jalaja Pemmaraju, Naveen |
author_sort | Harrison, Claire N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Targeting the BCL-X(L) pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X(L)/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609). METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 10(9)/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR(35)) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS(50)) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety. RESULTS: High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR(35) was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR(35) of 13.8 months. TSS(50) was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%). CONCLUSION: The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR(35), improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9113204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91132042022-05-18 Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy Harrison, Claire N. Garcia, Jacqueline S. Somervaille, Tim C.P. Foran, James M. Verstovsek, Srdan Jamieson, Catriona Mesa, Ruben Ritchie, Ellen K. Tantravahi, Srinivas K. Vachhani, Pankit O'Connell, Casey L. Komrokji, Rami S. Harb, Jason Hutti, Jessica E. Holes, Leanne Masud, Abdullah A. Nuthalapati, Silpa Potluri, Jalaja Pemmaraju, Naveen J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Targeting the BCL-X(L) pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X(L)/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609). METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 10(9)/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR(35)) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS(50)) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety. RESULTS: High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR(35) was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR(35) of 13.8 months. TSS(50) was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%). CONCLUSION: The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR(35), improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-05-20 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9113204/ /pubmed/35180010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02188 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Harrison, Claire N. Garcia, Jacqueline S. Somervaille, Tim C.P. Foran, James M. Verstovsek, Srdan Jamieson, Catriona Mesa, Ruben Ritchie, Ellen K. Tantravahi, Srinivas K. Vachhani, Pankit O'Connell, Casey L. Komrokji, Rami S. Harb, Jason Hutti, Jessica E. Holes, Leanne Masud, Abdullah A. Nuthalapati, Silpa Potluri, Jalaja Pemmaraju, Naveen Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy |
title | Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy |
title_full | Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy |
title_fullStr | Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy |
title_short | Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy |
title_sort | addition of navitoclax to ongoing ruxolitinib therapy for patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response: phase ii safety and efficacy |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonclairen additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT garciajacquelines additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT somervailletimcp additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT foranjamesm additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT verstovseksrdan additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT jamiesoncatriona additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT mesaruben additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT ritchieellenk additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT tantravahisrinivask additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT vachhanipankit additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT oconnellcaseyl additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT komrokjiramis additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT harbjason additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT huttijessicae additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT holesleanne additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT masudabdullaha additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT nuthalapatisilpa additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT potlurijalaja additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy AT pemmarajunaveen additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy |