Cargando…

Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy

Targeting the BCL-X(L) pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X(L)/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progressi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Claire N., Garcia, Jacqueline S., Somervaille, Tim C.P., Foran, James M., Verstovsek, Srdan, Jamieson, Catriona, Mesa, Ruben, Ritchie, Ellen K., Tantravahi, Srinivas K., Vachhani, Pankit, O'Connell, Casey L., Komrokji, Rami S., Harb, Jason, Hutti, Jessica E., Holes, Leanne, Masud, Abdullah A., Nuthalapati, Silpa, Potluri, Jalaja, Pemmaraju, Naveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02188
_version_ 1784709542413598720
author Harrison, Claire N.
Garcia, Jacqueline S.
Somervaille, Tim C.P.
Foran, James M.
Verstovsek, Srdan
Jamieson, Catriona
Mesa, Ruben
Ritchie, Ellen K.
Tantravahi, Srinivas K.
Vachhani, Pankit
O'Connell, Casey L.
Komrokji, Rami S.
Harb, Jason
Hutti, Jessica E.
Holes, Leanne
Masud, Abdullah A.
Nuthalapati, Silpa
Potluri, Jalaja
Pemmaraju, Naveen
author_facet Harrison, Claire N.
Garcia, Jacqueline S.
Somervaille, Tim C.P.
Foran, James M.
Verstovsek, Srdan
Jamieson, Catriona
Mesa, Ruben
Ritchie, Ellen K.
Tantravahi, Srinivas K.
Vachhani, Pankit
O'Connell, Casey L.
Komrokji, Rami S.
Harb, Jason
Hutti, Jessica E.
Holes, Leanne
Masud, Abdullah A.
Nuthalapati, Silpa
Potluri, Jalaja
Pemmaraju, Naveen
author_sort Harrison, Claire N.
collection PubMed
description Targeting the BCL-X(L) pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X(L)/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609). METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 10(9)/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR(35)) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS(50)) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety. RESULTS: High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR(35) was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR(35) of 13.8 months. TSS(50) was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%). CONCLUSION: The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR(35), improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9113204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91132042022-05-18 Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy Harrison, Claire N. Garcia, Jacqueline S. Somervaille, Tim C.P. Foran, James M. Verstovsek, Srdan Jamieson, Catriona Mesa, Ruben Ritchie, Ellen K. Tantravahi, Srinivas K. Vachhani, Pankit O'Connell, Casey L. Komrokji, Rami S. Harb, Jason Hutti, Jessica E. Holes, Leanne Masud, Abdullah A. Nuthalapati, Silpa Potluri, Jalaja Pemmaraju, Naveen J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Targeting the BCL-X(L) pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X(L)/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609). METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 10(9)/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR(35)) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS(50)) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety. RESULTS: High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR(35) was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR(35) of 13.8 months. TSS(50) was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%). CONCLUSION: The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR(35), improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-05-20 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9113204/ /pubmed/35180010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02188 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Harrison, Claire N.
Garcia, Jacqueline S.
Somervaille, Tim C.P.
Foran, James M.
Verstovsek, Srdan
Jamieson, Catriona
Mesa, Ruben
Ritchie, Ellen K.
Tantravahi, Srinivas K.
Vachhani, Pankit
O'Connell, Casey L.
Komrokji, Rami S.
Harb, Jason
Hutti, Jessica E.
Holes, Leanne
Masud, Abdullah A.
Nuthalapati, Silpa
Potluri, Jalaja
Pemmaraju, Naveen
Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
title Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
title_full Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
title_fullStr Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
title_short Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
title_sort addition of navitoclax to ongoing ruxolitinib therapy for patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response: phase ii safety and efficacy
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02188
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonclairen additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT garciajacquelines additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT somervailletimcp additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT foranjamesm additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT verstovseksrdan additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT jamiesoncatriona additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT mesaruben additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT ritchieellenk additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT tantravahisrinivask additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT vachhanipankit additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT oconnellcaseyl additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT komrokjiramis additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT harbjason additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT huttijessicae additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT holesleanne additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT masudabdullaha additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT nuthalapatisilpa additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT potlurijalaja additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy
AT pemmarajunaveen additionofnavitoclaxtoongoingruxolitinibtherapyforpatientswithmyelofibrosiswithprogressionorsuboptimalresponsephaseiisafetyandefficacy