Cargando…

Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS

Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senkowski, Daniel, Sobirey, Rabea, Haslacher, David, Soekadar, Surjo R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018
_version_ 1784709557377826816
author Senkowski, Daniel
Sobirey, Rabea
Haslacher, David
Soekadar, Surjo R
author_facet Senkowski, Daniel
Sobirey, Rabea
Haslacher, David
Soekadar, Surjo R
author_sort Senkowski, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS and tACS can modulate WM performance, but large variability in research approaches hinders the identification of optimal stimulation protocols and interpretation of study results. Moreover, it is unclear whether tDCS and tACS differentially affect WM. Here, we summarize and compare studies examining the effects of tDCS and tACS on WM performance in healthy adults. Following PRISMA-selection criteria, our systematic review resulted in 43 studies (29 tDCS, 11 tACS, 3 both) with a total of 1826 adult participants. For tDCS, only 4 out of 23 single-session studies reported effects on WM, while 7 out of 9 multi-session experiments showed positive effects on WM training. For tACS, 10 out of 14 studies demonstrated effects on WM, which were frequency dependent and robust for frontoparietal stimulation. Our review revealed no reliable effect of single-session tDCS on WM but moderate effects of multi-session tDCS and single-session tACS. We discuss the implications of these findings and future directions in the emerging research field of NIBS and WM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9113288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91132882022-05-18 Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS Senkowski, Daniel Sobirey, Rabea Haslacher, David Soekadar, Surjo R Cereb Cortex Commun Original Article Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS and tACS can modulate WM performance, but large variability in research approaches hinders the identification of optimal stimulation protocols and interpretation of study results. Moreover, it is unclear whether tDCS and tACS differentially affect WM. Here, we summarize and compare studies examining the effects of tDCS and tACS on WM performance in healthy adults. Following PRISMA-selection criteria, our systematic review resulted in 43 studies (29 tDCS, 11 tACS, 3 both) with a total of 1826 adult participants. For tDCS, only 4 out of 23 single-session studies reported effects on WM, while 7 out of 9 multi-session experiments showed positive effects on WM training. For tACS, 10 out of 14 studies demonstrated effects on WM, which were frequency dependent and robust for frontoparietal stimulation. Our review revealed no reliable effect of single-session tDCS on WM but moderate effects of multi-session tDCS and single-session tACS. We discuss the implications of these findings and future directions in the emerging research field of NIBS and WM. Oxford University Press 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9113288/ /pubmed/35592391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Senkowski, Daniel
Sobirey, Rabea
Haslacher, David
Soekadar, Surjo R
Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
title Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
title_full Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
title_fullStr Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
title_full_unstemmed Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
title_short Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
title_sort boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tdcs and tacs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018
work_keys_str_mv AT senkowskidaniel boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs
AT sobireyrabea boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs
AT haslacherdavid boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs
AT soekadarsurjor boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs