Cargando…
Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS
Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018 |
_version_ | 1784709557377826816 |
---|---|
author | Senkowski, Daniel Sobirey, Rabea Haslacher, David Soekadar, Surjo R |
author_facet | Senkowski, Daniel Sobirey, Rabea Haslacher, David Soekadar, Surjo R |
author_sort | Senkowski, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS and tACS can modulate WM performance, but large variability in research approaches hinders the identification of optimal stimulation protocols and interpretation of study results. Moreover, it is unclear whether tDCS and tACS differentially affect WM. Here, we summarize and compare studies examining the effects of tDCS and tACS on WM performance in healthy adults. Following PRISMA-selection criteria, our systematic review resulted in 43 studies (29 tDCS, 11 tACS, 3 both) with a total of 1826 adult participants. For tDCS, only 4 out of 23 single-session studies reported effects on WM, while 7 out of 9 multi-session experiments showed positive effects on WM training. For tACS, 10 out of 14 studies demonstrated effects on WM, which were frequency dependent and robust for frontoparietal stimulation. Our review revealed no reliable effect of single-session tDCS on WM but moderate effects of multi-session tDCS and single-session tACS. We discuss the implications of these findings and future directions in the emerging research field of NIBS and WM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9113288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91132882022-05-18 Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS Senkowski, Daniel Sobirey, Rabea Haslacher, David Soekadar, Surjo R Cereb Cortex Commun Original Article Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS and tACS can modulate WM performance, but large variability in research approaches hinders the identification of optimal stimulation protocols and interpretation of study results. Moreover, it is unclear whether tDCS and tACS differentially affect WM. Here, we summarize and compare studies examining the effects of tDCS and tACS on WM performance in healthy adults. Following PRISMA-selection criteria, our systematic review resulted in 43 studies (29 tDCS, 11 tACS, 3 both) with a total of 1826 adult participants. For tDCS, only 4 out of 23 single-session studies reported effects on WM, while 7 out of 9 multi-session experiments showed positive effects on WM training. For tACS, 10 out of 14 studies demonstrated effects on WM, which were frequency dependent and robust for frontoparietal stimulation. Our review revealed no reliable effect of single-session tDCS on WM but moderate effects of multi-session tDCS and single-session tACS. We discuss the implications of these findings and future directions in the emerging research field of NIBS and WM. Oxford University Press 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9113288/ /pubmed/35592391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Senkowski, Daniel Sobirey, Rabea Haslacher, David Soekadar, Surjo R Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS |
title | Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS |
title_full | Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS |
title_fullStr | Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS |
title_full_unstemmed | Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS |
title_short | Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS |
title_sort | boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tdcs and tacs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senkowskidaniel boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs AT sobireyrabea boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs AT haslacherdavid boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs AT soekadarsurjor boostingworkingmemoryuncoveringthedifferentialeffectsoftdcsandtacs |