Cargando…

Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis

Scaling up effective interventions, policies and programmes can improve breastfeeding (BF) outcomes. Furthermore, considerable interest exists in learning from relatively recent successful efforts that can inform further scaling up, with appropriate adaptations, across countries. The purpose of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández‐Cordero, Sonia, Pérez‐Escamilla, Rafael, Zambrano, Paul, Michaud‐Létourneau, Isabelle, Lara‐Mejía, Vania, Franco‐Lares, Bianca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13358
_version_ 1784709590790701056
author Hernández‐Cordero, Sonia
Pérez‐Escamilla, Rafael
Zambrano, Paul
Michaud‐Létourneau, Isabelle
Lara‐Mejía, Vania
Franco‐Lares, Bianca
author_facet Hernández‐Cordero, Sonia
Pérez‐Escamilla, Rafael
Zambrano, Paul
Michaud‐Létourneau, Isabelle
Lara‐Mejía, Vania
Franco‐Lares, Bianca
author_sort Hernández‐Cordero, Sonia
collection PubMed
description Scaling up effective interventions, policies and programmes can improve breastfeeding (BF) outcomes. Furthermore, considerable interest exists in learning from relatively recent successful efforts that can inform further scaling up, with appropriate adaptations, across countries. The purpose of this four‐country case studies analysis was to examine why and how improvements in BF practices occurred across four contrasting countries; Burkina Faso, the Philippines, Mexico and the United States of America. Literature reviews and key informant interviews were conducted to document BF trends over time, in addition to why and how BF protection, promotion and support policies and programmes were implemented at a national level. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted. The ‘Breastfeeding Gear Model’ and RE‐AIM (Reach; Effectiveness; Adoption; Implementation; and Maintenance) frameworks were used to understand and map the factors facilitating or hindering the scale up of the national programmes and corresponding improvements in BF practices. Each of the studied countries had different processes and timing to implement and scale up programmes to promote, protect and support breastfeeding. However, in all four countries, evidence‐based advocacy, multisectoral political will, financing, research and evaluation, and coordination were key to fostering an enabling environment for BF. Furthermore, in all countries, lack of adequate maternity protection and the aggressive marketing of the breast‐milk substitutes industry remains a strong source of negative feedback loops that are undermining investments in BF programmes. Country‐specific best practices included innovative legislative measures (Philippines), monitoring and evaluation systems (United States of America), engagement of civil society (Mexico) and behavior change communication BF promotion (Burkina Faso) initiatives. There is an urgent need to improve maternity protection and to strongly enforce the WHO Code of Marketing of Breast‐Milk Substitutes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9113475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91134752022-05-20 Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis Hernández‐Cordero, Sonia Pérez‐Escamilla, Rafael Zambrano, Paul Michaud‐Létourneau, Isabelle Lara‐Mejía, Vania Franco‐Lares, Bianca Matern Child Nutr What Will It Take to Increase Breastfeeding? Scaling up effective interventions, policies and programmes can improve breastfeeding (BF) outcomes. Furthermore, considerable interest exists in learning from relatively recent successful efforts that can inform further scaling up, with appropriate adaptations, across countries. The purpose of this four‐country case studies analysis was to examine why and how improvements in BF practices occurred across four contrasting countries; Burkina Faso, the Philippines, Mexico and the United States of America. Literature reviews and key informant interviews were conducted to document BF trends over time, in addition to why and how BF protection, promotion and support policies and programmes were implemented at a national level. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted. The ‘Breastfeeding Gear Model’ and RE‐AIM (Reach; Effectiveness; Adoption; Implementation; and Maintenance) frameworks were used to understand and map the factors facilitating or hindering the scale up of the national programmes and corresponding improvements in BF practices. Each of the studied countries had different processes and timing to implement and scale up programmes to promote, protect and support breastfeeding. However, in all four countries, evidence‐based advocacy, multisectoral political will, financing, research and evaluation, and coordination were key to fostering an enabling environment for BF. Furthermore, in all countries, lack of adequate maternity protection and the aggressive marketing of the breast‐milk substitutes industry remains a strong source of negative feedback loops that are undermining investments in BF programmes. Country‐specific best practices included innovative legislative measures (Philippines), monitoring and evaluation systems (United States of America), engagement of civil society (Mexico) and behavior change communication BF promotion (Burkina Faso) initiatives. There is an urgent need to improve maternity protection and to strongly enforce the WHO Code of Marketing of Breast‐Milk Substitutes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9113475/ /pubmed/35438250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13358 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle What Will It Take to Increase Breastfeeding?
Hernández‐Cordero, Sonia
Pérez‐Escamilla, Rafael
Zambrano, Paul
Michaud‐Létourneau, Isabelle
Lara‐Mejía, Vania
Franco‐Lares, Bianca
Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis
title Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis
title_full Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis
title_fullStr Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis
title_full_unstemmed Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis
title_short Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis
title_sort countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: comparative case studies analysis
topic What Will It Take to Increase Breastfeeding?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13358
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezcorderosonia countriesexperiencesscalingupnationalbreastfeedingprotectionpromotionandsupportprogrammescomparativecasestudiesanalysis
AT perezescamillarafael countriesexperiencesscalingupnationalbreastfeedingprotectionpromotionandsupportprogrammescomparativecasestudiesanalysis
AT zambranopaul countriesexperiencesscalingupnationalbreastfeedingprotectionpromotionandsupportprogrammescomparativecasestudiesanalysis
AT michaudletourneauisabelle countriesexperiencesscalingupnationalbreastfeedingprotectionpromotionandsupportprogrammescomparativecasestudiesanalysis
AT laramejiavania countriesexperiencesscalingupnationalbreastfeedingprotectionpromotionandsupportprogrammescomparativecasestudiesanalysis
AT francolaresbianca countriesexperiencesscalingupnationalbreastfeedingprotectionpromotionandsupportprogrammescomparativecasestudiesanalysis