Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in relation to RT-PCR C(q) Value

BACKGROUND: Early detection of the SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for both the improvement of turnaround time and limiting the spread of the virus in the community. Thus, this study aims to establish rapid antigen tests as an effective diagnostic tool to improve the testing strategies of COVID-19 diagnosis....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandal, Dipendra Kumar, Bhattarai, Bibek Raj, Pokhrel, Sushant, Chhusyabaga, Mandira, Bhandari, Parmananda, Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad, Marhattha, Sujan Babu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9245248
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Early detection of the SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for both the improvement of turnaround time and limiting the spread of the virus in the community. Thus, this study aims to establish rapid antigen tests as an effective diagnostic tool to improve the testing strategies of COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: A laboratory based cross-sectional study was performed on the patients that visited Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital (STIDH) in Kathmandu, Nepal, from November 2020 to January 2021. A total of 213 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients for rapid antigen test, followed by RT-PCR assay as reference test for confirmation of COVID-19. A standard questionnaire was administered to collect other information from patients. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: Out of 213 individuals, 75 tested positive in Ag-RDT test, while 118 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome via Real time PCR assay. The overall diagnostic performance of Ag-RDT showed 63.6% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of Ag- RDT was 78.9% with κ value 0.590, showing moderate agreement with RT-PCR. Significant difference (p value <0.001) was observed between Ag- RDT(+) and Ag- RDT(−) results when compared to C(q) values obtained from RT- PCR. CONCLUSION: The promising performance of Ag-RDT renders it useful as screening tool alongside RT-PCR to reduce transmission via improving contact tracing, implementation of local mitigation strategies, and refining existing testing protocol for diagnosis of COVID-19.