Cargando…
High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation
INTRODUCTION: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is a novel strategy using contact force-sensing catheters optimized for radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). No study has directly compared HPSD versus standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) contact force-sensing settings in p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01987-9 |
_version_ | 1784709694274666496 |
---|---|
author | Junarta, Joey Dikdan, Sean J. Upadhyay, Naman Bodempudi, Sairamya Shvili, Michael Y. Frisch, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Junarta, Joey Dikdan, Sean J. Upadhyay, Naman Bodempudi, Sairamya Shvili, Michael Y. Frisch, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Junarta, Joey |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is a novel strategy using contact force-sensing catheters optimized for radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). No study has directly compared HPSD versus standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) contact force-sensing settings in patients presenting for repeat ablation with AF recurrence after initial ablation. METHODS: We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing repeat ablation with SPSD or HPSD settings after their initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with temperature controlled non-contact force, SPSD or HPSD settings between 6/23/14 and 3/4/20. Procedural data collected included radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT). Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients underwent repeat ablation (36 SPSD, 25 HPSD). A total of 51 patients (83.6%) were found to have pulmonary vein reconnections necessitating repeat isolation, 10 patients (16.4%) had durable PVI and ablation targeted non-PV sources. RADT was shorter when comparing repeat ablation using HPSD compared to SPSD (22 vs 35 min; p = 0.01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log rank test p = 0.87), after 3 or 12-months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type, left atrial volume index, CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score, or left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that repeat AF ablation with HPSD reduced procedure times with similar sinus rhythm maintenance compared to SPSD in those presenting for repeat ablation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00380-021-01987-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9114024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91140242022-05-19 High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation Junarta, Joey Dikdan, Sean J. Upadhyay, Naman Bodempudi, Sairamya Shvili, Michael Y. Frisch, Daniel R. Heart Vessels Original Article INTRODUCTION: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is a novel strategy using contact force-sensing catheters optimized for radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). No study has directly compared HPSD versus standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) contact force-sensing settings in patients presenting for repeat ablation with AF recurrence after initial ablation. METHODS: We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing repeat ablation with SPSD or HPSD settings after their initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with temperature controlled non-contact force, SPSD or HPSD settings between 6/23/14 and 3/4/20. Procedural data collected included radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT). Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients underwent repeat ablation (36 SPSD, 25 HPSD). A total of 51 patients (83.6%) were found to have pulmonary vein reconnections necessitating repeat isolation, 10 patients (16.4%) had durable PVI and ablation targeted non-PV sources. RADT was shorter when comparing repeat ablation using HPSD compared to SPSD (22 vs 35 min; p = 0.01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log rank test p = 0.87), after 3 or 12-months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type, left atrial volume index, CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score, or left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that repeat AF ablation with HPSD reduced procedure times with similar sinus rhythm maintenance compared to SPSD in those presenting for repeat ablation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00380-021-01987-9. Springer Japan 2021-11-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9114024/ /pubmed/34846561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01987-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Junarta, Joey Dikdan, Sean J. Upadhyay, Naman Bodempudi, Sairamya Shvili, Michael Y. Frisch, Daniel R. High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
title | High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
title_full | High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
title_fullStr | High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
title_short | High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
title_sort | high-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01987-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junartajoey highpowershortdurationversusstandardpowerstandarddurationsettingsforrepeatatrialfibrillationablation AT dikdanseanj highpowershortdurationversusstandardpowerstandarddurationsettingsforrepeatatrialfibrillationablation AT upadhyaynaman highpowershortdurationversusstandardpowerstandarddurationsettingsforrepeatatrialfibrillationablation AT bodempudisairamya highpowershortdurationversusstandardpowerstandarddurationsettingsforrepeatatrialfibrillationablation AT shvilimichaely highpowershortdurationversusstandardpowerstandarddurationsettingsforrepeatatrialfibrillationablation AT frischdanielr highpowershortdurationversusstandardpowerstandarddurationsettingsforrepeatatrialfibrillationablation |