Cargando…

Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation

Skeletal stem cells (SSCs, or mesenchymal stromal cells typically referred to as mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow) are a dynamic progenitor population that can enter quiescence, self-renew or differentiate depending on regenerative demand and cues from their niche environment. However, ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Hilary J., Sahoo, Jugal Kishore, Wells, Julia, van Nuffel, Sebastiaan, Dhowre, Hala S., Oreffo, Richard O. C., Zelzer, Mischa, Ulijn, Rein V., Dalby, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12057-z
_version_ 1784709714404179968
author Anderson, Hilary J.
Sahoo, Jugal Kishore
Wells, Julia
van Nuffel, Sebastiaan
Dhowre, Hala S.
Oreffo, Richard O. C.
Zelzer, Mischa
Ulijn, Rein V.
Dalby, Matthew J.
author_facet Anderson, Hilary J.
Sahoo, Jugal Kishore
Wells, Julia
van Nuffel, Sebastiaan
Dhowre, Hala S.
Oreffo, Richard O. C.
Zelzer, Mischa
Ulijn, Rein V.
Dalby, Matthew J.
author_sort Anderson, Hilary J.
collection PubMed
description Skeletal stem cells (SSCs, or mesenchymal stromal cells typically referred to as mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow) are a dynamic progenitor population that can enter quiescence, self-renew or differentiate depending on regenerative demand and cues from their niche environment. However, ex vivo, in culture, they are grown typically on hard polystyrene surfaces, and this leads to rapid loss of the SSC phenotype. While materials are being developed that can control SSC growth and differentiation, very few examples of dynamic interfaces that reflect the plastic nature of the stem cells have, to date, been developed. Achieving such interfaces is challenging because of competing needs: growing SSCs require lower cell adhesion and intracellular tension while differentiation to, for example, bone-forming osteoblasts requires increased adhesion and intracellular tension. We previously reported a dynamic interface where the cell adhesion tripeptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) was presented to the cells upon activation by user-added elastase that cleaved a bulky blocking group hiding RGD from the cells. This allowed for a growth phase while the blocking group was in place and the cells could only form smaller adhesions, followed by an osteoblast differentiation phase that was induced after elastase was added which triggered exposure of RGD and subsequent cell adhesion and contraction. Here, we aimed to develop an autonomous system where the surface is activated according to the need of the cell by using matrix metalloprotease (MMP) cleavable peptide sequences to remove the blocking group with the hypothesis that the SSCs would produce higher levels of MMP as the cells reached confluence. The current studies demonstrate that SSCs produce active MMP-2 that can cleave functional groups on a surface. We also demonstrate that SSCs can grow on the uncleaved surface and, with time, produce osteogenic marker proteins on the MMP-responsive surface. These studies demonstrate the concept for cell-controlled surfaces that can modulate adhesion and phenotype with significant implications for stem cell phenotype modulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9114122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91141222022-05-19 Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation Anderson, Hilary J. Sahoo, Jugal Kishore Wells, Julia van Nuffel, Sebastiaan Dhowre, Hala S. Oreffo, Richard O. C. Zelzer, Mischa Ulijn, Rein V. Dalby, Matthew J. Sci Rep Article Skeletal stem cells (SSCs, or mesenchymal stromal cells typically referred to as mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow) are a dynamic progenitor population that can enter quiescence, self-renew or differentiate depending on regenerative demand and cues from their niche environment. However, ex vivo, in culture, they are grown typically on hard polystyrene surfaces, and this leads to rapid loss of the SSC phenotype. While materials are being developed that can control SSC growth and differentiation, very few examples of dynamic interfaces that reflect the plastic nature of the stem cells have, to date, been developed. Achieving such interfaces is challenging because of competing needs: growing SSCs require lower cell adhesion and intracellular tension while differentiation to, for example, bone-forming osteoblasts requires increased adhesion and intracellular tension. We previously reported a dynamic interface where the cell adhesion tripeptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) was presented to the cells upon activation by user-added elastase that cleaved a bulky blocking group hiding RGD from the cells. This allowed for a growth phase while the blocking group was in place and the cells could only form smaller adhesions, followed by an osteoblast differentiation phase that was induced after elastase was added which triggered exposure of RGD and subsequent cell adhesion and contraction. Here, we aimed to develop an autonomous system where the surface is activated according to the need of the cell by using matrix metalloprotease (MMP) cleavable peptide sequences to remove the blocking group with the hypothesis that the SSCs would produce higher levels of MMP as the cells reached confluence. The current studies demonstrate that SSCs produce active MMP-2 that can cleave functional groups on a surface. We also demonstrate that SSCs can grow on the uncleaved surface and, with time, produce osteogenic marker proteins on the MMP-responsive surface. These studies demonstrate the concept for cell-controlled surfaces that can modulate adhesion and phenotype with significant implications for stem cell phenotype modulation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9114122/ /pubmed/35581256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12057-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Anderson, Hilary J.
Sahoo, Jugal Kishore
Wells, Julia
van Nuffel, Sebastiaan
Dhowre, Hala S.
Oreffo, Richard O. C.
Zelzer, Mischa
Ulijn, Rein V.
Dalby, Matthew J.
Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
title Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
title_full Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
title_fullStr Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
title_short Cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
title_sort cell-controlled dynamic surfaces for skeletal stem cell growth and differentiation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12057-z
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonhilaryj cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT sahoojugalkishore cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT wellsjulia cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT vannuffelsebastiaan cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT dhowrehalas cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT orefforichardoc cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT zelzermischa cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT ulijnreinv cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation
AT dalbymatthewj cellcontrolleddynamicsurfacesforskeletalstemcellgrowthanddifferentiation