Cargando…
Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of vitrectomy with multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique (ML-IILM) versus vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling for large macular holes in terms of visual acuity and anatomical closure. METHODS: A hospital-based, prospective, randomized, inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1530_21 |
_version_ | 1784709817250611200 |
---|---|
author | Agrawal, Vishal Jindal, Khushbu Dhakad, Yogendra Rathore, Priyanka Khilnani, Kamlesh |
author_facet | Agrawal, Vishal Jindal, Khushbu Dhakad, Yogendra Rathore, Priyanka Khilnani, Kamlesh |
author_sort | Agrawal, Vishal |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of vitrectomy with multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique (ML-IILM) versus vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling for large macular holes in terms of visual acuity and anatomical closure. METHODS: A hospital-based, prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted during three calendar years with a total 150 eyes (75 in each group) in two groups—vitrectomy with ILM peeling (Group A) and vitrectomy with ML-IILM flap technique (Group B) after informed consent of study participants who met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The mean minimum and maximum diameter of macular hole did not differ statistically in both the groups. Macular hole index had no significant difference between both groups Pre-operative visual acuity was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. During follow-up, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months was significantly better in Group B (0.12 ± 0.07 at 1 month, 0.14 ± 0.10 at 3 months, 0.18 ± 0.11 at 6 months, and 0.19 ± 0.12 at 12 months) compared to Group A (0.20 ± 0.11 at 1 month, 0.22 ± 0.13 at 3 months, 0.30 ± 0.12 at 6 months, and 0.31 ± 0.14 at 12 months) (P = 0.001 for each). Type 1 anatomical closure (flattening of cuff and opposition of edges of hole) was achieved in 78.66% (59/75) cases in Group A and 93.33% (70/75) cases in Group B (P 0.0016). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy with multilayered inverted ILM flap technique had significantly higher anatomical closure and better visual outcome than vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9114613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91146132022-05-19 Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study Agrawal, Vishal Jindal, Khushbu Dhakad, Yogendra Rathore, Priyanka Khilnani, Kamlesh Indian J Ophthalmol Special Focus, Retina, Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of vitrectomy with multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique (ML-IILM) versus vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling for large macular holes in terms of visual acuity and anatomical closure. METHODS: A hospital-based, prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted during three calendar years with a total 150 eyes (75 in each group) in two groups—vitrectomy with ILM peeling (Group A) and vitrectomy with ML-IILM flap technique (Group B) after informed consent of study participants who met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The mean minimum and maximum diameter of macular hole did not differ statistically in both the groups. Macular hole index had no significant difference between both groups Pre-operative visual acuity was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. During follow-up, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months was significantly better in Group B (0.12 ± 0.07 at 1 month, 0.14 ± 0.10 at 3 months, 0.18 ± 0.11 at 6 months, and 0.19 ± 0.12 at 12 months) compared to Group A (0.20 ± 0.11 at 1 month, 0.22 ± 0.13 at 3 months, 0.30 ± 0.12 at 6 months, and 0.31 ± 0.14 at 12 months) (P = 0.001 for each). Type 1 anatomical closure (flattening of cuff and opposition of edges of hole) was achieved in 78.66% (59/75) cases in Group A and 93.33% (70/75) cases in Group B (P 0.0016). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy with multilayered inverted ILM flap technique had significantly higher anatomical closure and better visual outcome than vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9114613/ /pubmed/35225542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1530_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Special Focus, Retina, Original Article Agrawal, Vishal Jindal, Khushbu Dhakad, Yogendra Rathore, Priyanka Khilnani, Kamlesh Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study |
title | Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study |
title_full | Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study |
title_fullStr | Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study |
title_short | Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study |
title_sort | multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: a comparative study |
topic | Special Focus, Retina, Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1530_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agrawalvishal multilayeredinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusstandardinternallimitingmembranepeelingforlargemacularholesacomparativestudy AT jindalkhushbu multilayeredinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusstandardinternallimitingmembranepeelingforlargemacularholesacomparativestudy AT dhakadyogendra multilayeredinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusstandardinternallimitingmembranepeelingforlargemacularholesacomparativestudy AT rathorepriyanka multilayeredinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusstandardinternallimitingmembranepeelingforlargemacularholesacomparativestudy AT khilnanikamlesh multilayeredinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusstandardinternallimitingmembranepeelingforlargemacularholesacomparativestudy |