Cargando…

Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches

BACKGROUND: We draw on the work of established scholars in the field of reflective practice who highlight its importance as a key cognitive skill for professionals to hold. While the substantive effect of engaging in reflective practice is emphasised in the literature, apparently coaches only spend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nash, Christine, MacPherson, Alan C., Collins, Dave
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867720
_version_ 1784709850807140352
author Nash, Christine
MacPherson, Alan C.
Collins, Dave
author_facet Nash, Christine
MacPherson, Alan C.
Collins, Dave
author_sort Nash, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We draw on the work of established scholars in the field of reflective practice who highlight its importance as a key cognitive skill for professionals to hold. While the substantive effect of engaging in reflective practice is emphasised in the literature, apparently coaches only spend a limited time learning about and engaging with it. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted in two parts: Part 1 examined coaches’ knowledge of reflective practice and ascertained their perceived lack of value and use of reflective practice within their coaching. In response to the unexpected findings in Part 1, in Part 2, we instituted an educational intervention to further these participant coaches’ knowledge of Reflective Practice (RP) and facilitate its integration into their coaching practice. DESIGN: The present study utilised a mixed method design with semi-structured interviews being conducted in Part 1. A coach development reflective programme inspired by Stimulated Recall approach was implemented in Part 2. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve high level coaches were interviewed about their reflective practices in Part 1. In Part 2, the same coaches agreed to participate in the educational intervention for the duration of the project. RESULTS: Findings from Part 1 revealed an interesting paradox: coaches demonstrated a lack of appreciation for reflective practice yet recounted the positive influence that specific events and individuals had on their practice. In Part 2, to fully develop RP with the present cohort, an educational intervention was conducted. While watching videos of their own practice, coaches initially required lots of prompts from the lead interviewer to facilitate a deep and meaningful discussion of their practice. During the latter stages of the intervention, however, participants were less dependent on questions and prompts. CONCLUSION: In part 1, the coaches in this study did employ reflection, although they did not label it as such. The qualitative evidence we have gathered enables us to suggest that it is the combination of how to reflect, and against what criteria that makes RP a powerful tool to develop expertise which it has the potential to be. Importantly, however, additional coach education input is necessary for these benefits to be fully realised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9114759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91147592022-05-19 Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches Nash, Christine MacPherson, Alan C. Collins, Dave Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: We draw on the work of established scholars in the field of reflective practice who highlight its importance as a key cognitive skill for professionals to hold. While the substantive effect of engaging in reflective practice is emphasised in the literature, apparently coaches only spend a limited time learning about and engaging with it. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted in two parts: Part 1 examined coaches’ knowledge of reflective practice and ascertained their perceived lack of value and use of reflective practice within their coaching. In response to the unexpected findings in Part 1, in Part 2, we instituted an educational intervention to further these participant coaches’ knowledge of Reflective Practice (RP) and facilitate its integration into their coaching practice. DESIGN: The present study utilised a mixed method design with semi-structured interviews being conducted in Part 1. A coach development reflective programme inspired by Stimulated Recall approach was implemented in Part 2. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve high level coaches were interviewed about their reflective practices in Part 1. In Part 2, the same coaches agreed to participate in the educational intervention for the duration of the project. RESULTS: Findings from Part 1 revealed an interesting paradox: coaches demonstrated a lack of appreciation for reflective practice yet recounted the positive influence that specific events and individuals had on their practice. In Part 2, to fully develop RP with the present cohort, an educational intervention was conducted. While watching videos of their own practice, coaches initially required lots of prompts from the lead interviewer to facilitate a deep and meaningful discussion of their practice. During the latter stages of the intervention, however, participants were less dependent on questions and prompts. CONCLUSION: In part 1, the coaches in this study did employ reflection, although they did not label it as such. The qualitative evidence we have gathered enables us to suggest that it is the combination of how to reflect, and against what criteria that makes RP a powerful tool to develop expertise which it has the potential to be. Importantly, however, additional coach education input is necessary for these benefits to be fully realised. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9114759/ /pubmed/35602681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867720 Text en Copyright © 2022 Nash, MacPherson and Collins. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Nash, Christine
MacPherson, Alan C.
Collins, Dave
Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches
title Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches
title_full Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches
title_fullStr Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches
title_short Reflections on Reflection: Clarifying and Promoting Use in Experienced Coaches
title_sort reflections on reflection: clarifying and promoting use in experienced coaches
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867720
work_keys_str_mv AT nashchristine reflectionsonreflectionclarifyingandpromotinguseinexperiencedcoaches
AT macphersonalanc reflectionsonreflectionclarifyingandpromotinguseinexperiencedcoaches
AT collinsdave reflectionsonreflectionclarifyingandpromotinguseinexperiencedcoaches