Cargando…
Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common disorders presenting in primary healthcare. Kinematic studies of low lumbar pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyography (sEMG) may assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. However, the applicability in the use of s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058652 |
_version_ | 1784709884072165376 |
---|---|
author | Lathlean, Timothy Ramachandran, Akhilesh Kumar Sim, Stephanie Whittle, Ian R |
author_facet | Lathlean, Timothy Ramachandran, Akhilesh Kumar Sim, Stephanie Whittle, Ian R |
author_sort | Lathlean, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common disorders presenting in primary healthcare. Kinematic studies of low lumbar pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyography (sEMG) may assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. However, the applicability in the use of sEMG in the clinical setting remains uncertain. In this protocol, we aim to review the clinical utility and reproducibility of the sEMG component of these kinematic studies in patients with CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and results will be reported in line with the PRISMA. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases, along with a comprehensive review of grey literature. Two reviewers will conduct the searches and independently screen them, according to title and abstract. Two independent reviewers will then assess the full-text versions of those selected articles and assess the risk of bias using the defined protocol inclusion criteria. The risk of bias within the studies included will be assessed via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, V.2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used to assess certainty of evidence for recommendations based on the risk of bias findings. Meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate on groups of studies with low heterogeneity. In instances of higher heterogeneity, meta-synthesis will instead be completed, comparing results in terms of increased or decreased clinical utility and/or reproducibility of sEMG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required for this research. It is anticipated that the results will influence the use, interpretation and further development of sEMG in management and assessment of these patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021273936. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9114948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91149482022-06-04 Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Lathlean, Timothy Ramachandran, Akhilesh Kumar Sim, Stephanie Whittle, Ian R BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common disorders presenting in primary healthcare. Kinematic studies of low lumbar pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyography (sEMG) may assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. However, the applicability in the use of sEMG in the clinical setting remains uncertain. In this protocol, we aim to review the clinical utility and reproducibility of the sEMG component of these kinematic studies in patients with CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and results will be reported in line with the PRISMA. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases, along with a comprehensive review of grey literature. Two reviewers will conduct the searches and independently screen them, according to title and abstract. Two independent reviewers will then assess the full-text versions of those selected articles and assess the risk of bias using the defined protocol inclusion criteria. The risk of bias within the studies included will be assessed via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, V.2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used to assess certainty of evidence for recommendations based on the risk of bias findings. Meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate on groups of studies with low heterogeneity. In instances of higher heterogeneity, meta-synthesis will instead be completed, comparing results in terms of increased or decreased clinical utility and/or reproducibility of sEMG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required for this research. It is anticipated that the results will influence the use, interpretation and further development of sEMG in management and assessment of these patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021273936. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9114948/ /pubmed/35577472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058652 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Lathlean, Timothy Ramachandran, Akhilesh Kumar Sim, Stephanie Whittle, Ian R Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lathleantimothy clinicalutilityandreproducibilityofsurfaceelectromyographyinindividualswithchroniclowbackpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ramachandranakhileshkumar clinicalutilityandreproducibilityofsurfaceelectromyographyinindividualswithchroniclowbackpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT simstephanie clinicalutilityandreproducibilityofsurfaceelectromyographyinindividualswithchroniclowbackpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT whittleianr clinicalutilityandreproducibilityofsurfaceelectromyographyinindividualswithchroniclowbackpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |