Cargando…

Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Globally, haemorrhage is the leading cause of both maternal mortality and preventable trauma death. For patients suffering from haemorrhage, prompt blood transfusion can be life-saving; however, safe and sufficient blood is often lacking in low-resource settings (LRS). Autotransfusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmqvist, Maria, Von Schreeb, Johan, Älgå, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056018
_version_ 1784709890677145600
author Palmqvist, Maria
Von Schreeb, Johan
Älgå, Andreas
author_facet Palmqvist, Maria
Von Schreeb, Johan
Älgå, Andreas
author_sort Palmqvist, Maria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Globally, haemorrhage is the leading cause of both maternal mortality and preventable trauma death. For patients suffering from haemorrhage, prompt blood transfusion can be life-saving; however, safe and sufficient blood is often lacking in low-resource settings (LRS). Autotransfusion (AT), in which the patient’s own blood is collected and transfused back, is an established alternative to donor blood transfusions, although one that is primarily performed with advanced AT systems. Research on basic AT in LRS is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to consolidate all available information on the current use of basic AT in LRS and to identify AT techniques and devices described for use in such settings. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We systematically searched four key databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Global Health and Cochrane Library as well as several grey literature databases and databases of relevant organisations. The final search was conducted on 22 April 2019. We included all types of studies referring to any information on basic AT used or sought to be used in LRS, published in English and dated after 31 December 2008. We synthesised the data from the included studies, results were charted or summarised narratively. RESULTS: Some 370 records were reviewed, yielding 38 included documents. We found a paucity of scientific evidence as well as contradictory information on the extent of AT use and that AT use is largely undocumented. The most commonly described indications were haemoperitoneum (primarily among obstetric patients) and haemothorax. We identified three AT techniques used in LRS. Additionally, two new devices and one filter are described for potential use in LRS. CONCLUSIONS: Basic AT is practiced for certain obstetric and trauma indications. However, context-specific studies are needed to determine the technique’s safety and effectiveness. Extent of use is difficult to assess, but our results indicate that basic AT is not a widely established practice in LRS. Future research should address the bottlenecks hampering basic AT availability. New AT devices for use in LRS are described, but their utility and cost-effectiveness remain to be assessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9115006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91150062022-06-04 Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review Palmqvist, Maria Von Schreeb, Johan Älgå, Andreas BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Globally, haemorrhage is the leading cause of both maternal mortality and preventable trauma death. For patients suffering from haemorrhage, prompt blood transfusion can be life-saving; however, safe and sufficient blood is often lacking in low-resource settings (LRS). Autotransfusion (AT), in which the patient’s own blood is collected and transfused back, is an established alternative to donor blood transfusions, although one that is primarily performed with advanced AT systems. Research on basic AT in LRS is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to consolidate all available information on the current use of basic AT in LRS and to identify AT techniques and devices described for use in such settings. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We systematically searched four key databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Global Health and Cochrane Library as well as several grey literature databases and databases of relevant organisations. The final search was conducted on 22 April 2019. We included all types of studies referring to any information on basic AT used or sought to be used in LRS, published in English and dated after 31 December 2008. We synthesised the data from the included studies, results were charted or summarised narratively. RESULTS: Some 370 records were reviewed, yielding 38 included documents. We found a paucity of scientific evidence as well as contradictory information on the extent of AT use and that AT use is largely undocumented. The most commonly described indications were haemoperitoneum (primarily among obstetric patients) and haemothorax. We identified three AT techniques used in LRS. Additionally, two new devices and one filter are described for potential use in LRS. CONCLUSIONS: Basic AT is practiced for certain obstetric and trauma indications. However, context-specific studies are needed to determine the technique’s safety and effectiveness. Extent of use is difficult to assess, but our results indicate that basic AT is not a widely established practice in LRS. Future research should address the bottlenecks hampering basic AT availability. New AT devices for use in LRS are described, but their utility and cost-effectiveness remain to be assessed. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9115006/ /pubmed/35577473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056018 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Palmqvist, Maria
Von Schreeb, Johan
Älgå, Andreas
Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
title Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
title_full Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
title_fullStr Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
title_short Autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
title_sort autotransfusion in low-resource settings: a scoping review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056018
work_keys_str_mv AT palmqvistmaria autotransfusioninlowresourcesettingsascopingreview
AT vonschreebjohan autotransfusioninlowresourcesettingsascopingreview
AT algaandreas autotransfusioninlowresourcesettingsascopingreview