Cargando…

TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID-19 patients may develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and the need for respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Previous observational studies have suggested early tracheotomy to be advantageous. The aim of this parallel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eeg-Olofsson, Måns, Pauli, Nina, Hafsten, Louise, Jacobsson, Josephine, Lundborg, Christopher, Brink, Magnus, Larsson, Helen, Lindell, Ellen, Löwhagen, Karin, Gisslén, Magnus, Bergquist, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04005-0
_version_ 1784709941429272576
author Eeg-Olofsson, Måns
Pauli, Nina
Hafsten, Louise
Jacobsson, Josephine
Lundborg, Christopher
Brink, Magnus
Larsson, Helen
Lindell, Ellen
Löwhagen, Karin
Gisslén, Magnus
Bergquist, Henrik
author_facet Eeg-Olofsson, Måns
Pauli, Nina
Hafsten, Louise
Jacobsson, Josephine
Lundborg, Christopher
Brink, Magnus
Larsson, Helen
Lindell, Ellen
Löwhagen, Karin
Gisslén, Magnus
Bergquist, Henrik
author_sort Eeg-Olofsson, Måns
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID-19 patients may develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and the need for respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Previous observational studies have suggested early tracheotomy to be advantageous. The aim of this parallel, multicentre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the optimal timing of tracheotomy. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2-infected patients within the Region Västra Götaland of Sweden who needed intubation and mechanical respiratory support were included and randomly assigned to early tracheotomy (≤ 7 days after intubation) or late tracheotomy (≥ 10 days after intubation). The primary objective was to compare the total number of mechanical ventilation days between the groups. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (mean age 65 years, 79% males) were included. Seventy-two patients were assigned to early tracheotomy, and 78 were assigned to late tracheotomy. One hundred two patients (68%) underwent tracheotomy of whom sixty-one underwent tracheotomy according to the protocol. The overall median number of days in mechanical ventilation was 18 (IQR 9; 28), but no significant difference was found between the two treatment regimens in the intention-to-treat analysis (between-group difference: − 1.5 days (95% CI − 5.7 to 2.8); p = 0.5). A significantly reduced number of mechanical ventilation days was found in the early tracheotomy group during the per-protocol analysis (between-group difference: − 8.0 days (95% CI − 13.8 to − 2.27); p = 0.0064). The overall correlation between the timing of tracheotomy and days of mechanical ventilation was significant (Spearman’s correlation: 0.39, p < 0.0001). The total death rate during intensive care was 32.7%, but no significant differences were found between the groups regarding survival, complications or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The potential superiority of early tracheotomy when compared to late tracheotomy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not confirmed by the present randomized controlled trial but is a strategy that should be considered in selected cases where the need for MV for more than 14 days cannot be ruled out. Trial registration NCT04412356, registered 05/24/2020. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04005-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9115544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91155442022-05-18 TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial Eeg-Olofsson, Måns Pauli, Nina Hafsten, Louise Jacobsson, Josephine Lundborg, Christopher Brink, Magnus Larsson, Helen Lindell, Ellen Löwhagen, Karin Gisslén, Magnus Bergquist, Henrik Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID-19 patients may develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and the need for respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Previous observational studies have suggested early tracheotomy to be advantageous. The aim of this parallel, multicentre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the optimal timing of tracheotomy. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2-infected patients within the Region Västra Götaland of Sweden who needed intubation and mechanical respiratory support were included and randomly assigned to early tracheotomy (≤ 7 days after intubation) or late tracheotomy (≥ 10 days after intubation). The primary objective was to compare the total number of mechanical ventilation days between the groups. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (mean age 65 years, 79% males) were included. Seventy-two patients were assigned to early tracheotomy, and 78 were assigned to late tracheotomy. One hundred two patients (68%) underwent tracheotomy of whom sixty-one underwent tracheotomy according to the protocol. The overall median number of days in mechanical ventilation was 18 (IQR 9; 28), but no significant difference was found between the two treatment regimens in the intention-to-treat analysis (between-group difference: − 1.5 days (95% CI − 5.7 to 2.8); p = 0.5). A significantly reduced number of mechanical ventilation days was found in the early tracheotomy group during the per-protocol analysis (between-group difference: − 8.0 days (95% CI − 13.8 to − 2.27); p = 0.0064). The overall correlation between the timing of tracheotomy and days of mechanical ventilation was significant (Spearman’s correlation: 0.39, p < 0.0001). The total death rate during intensive care was 32.7%, but no significant differences were found between the groups regarding survival, complications or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The potential superiority of early tracheotomy when compared to late tracheotomy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not confirmed by the present randomized controlled trial but is a strategy that should be considered in selected cases where the need for MV for more than 14 days cannot be ruled out. Trial registration NCT04412356, registered 05/24/2020. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04005-0. BioMed Central 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9115544/ /pubmed/35585614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04005-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Eeg-Olofsson, Måns
Pauli, Nina
Hafsten, Louise
Jacobsson, Josephine
Lundborg, Christopher
Brink, Magnus
Larsson, Helen
Lindell, Ellen
Löwhagen, Karin
Gisslén, Magnus
Bergquist, Henrik
TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
title TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
title_full TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
title_short TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
title_sort ttcov19: timing of tracheotomy in sars-cov-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04005-0
work_keys_str_mv AT eegolofssonmans ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paulinina ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hafstenlouise ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jacobssonjosephine ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lundborgchristopher ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brinkmagnus ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT larssonhelen ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lindellellen ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lowhagenkarin ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gisslenmagnus ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bergquisthenrik ttcov19timingoftracheotomyinsarscov2infectedpatientsamulticentresingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial