Cargando…

Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach

Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas, Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati, Hod, Rozita, Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal, Chan, Huan-Keat, Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599752
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S359450
_version_ 1784709994343563264
author Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas
Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati
Hod, Rozita
Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal
Chan, Huan-Keat
Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi
author_facet Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas
Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati
Hod, Rozita
Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal
Chan, Huan-Keat
Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi
author_sort Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas
collection PubMed
description Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted through Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCOHost. Full-text guidelines which were published between 2011 and 2021, along with guidelines which provided recommendations on CRC screening in average-risk individuals, were included in the review. However, guidelines focusing only on a single screening modality were excluded. Fourteen guidelines fulfilling the eligibility criteria were retained for the final review and analysis. Quality assessment of each guideline was performed using the AGREE II instrument. Disparities in guidelines identified in this review were classified into ecological (screening modalities and strategies), biological (recommended age, gender and ethnicities), and social (smoking history, socioeconomic status, and behavior) factors. In general, unstandardized practices in CRC screening for average-risk individuals are likely attributable to the inconsistent and non-specific recommendations in the literature. This review calls on stakeholders and policymakers to review the existing colorectal cancer screening practices and pursue standardization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9115807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91158072022-05-19 Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati Hod, Rozita Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal Chan, Huan-Keat Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted through Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCOHost. Full-text guidelines which were published between 2011 and 2021, along with guidelines which provided recommendations on CRC screening in average-risk individuals, were included in the review. However, guidelines focusing only on a single screening modality were excluded. Fourteen guidelines fulfilling the eligibility criteria were retained for the final review and analysis. Quality assessment of each guideline was performed using the AGREE II instrument. Disparities in guidelines identified in this review were classified into ecological (screening modalities and strategies), biological (recommended age, gender and ethnicities), and social (smoking history, socioeconomic status, and behavior) factors. In general, unstandardized practices in CRC screening for average-risk individuals are likely attributable to the inconsistent and non-specific recommendations in the literature. This review calls on stakeholders and policymakers to review the existing colorectal cancer screening practices and pursue standardization. Dove 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9115807/ /pubmed/35599752 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S359450 Text en © 2022 Syed Soffian et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas
Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati
Hod, Rozita
Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal
Chan, Huan-Keat
Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi
Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
title Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
title_full Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
title_fullStr Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
title_short Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
title_sort disparities in recommendations for colorectal cancer screening among average-risk individuals: an ecobiosocial approach
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599752
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S359450
work_keys_str_mv AT syedsoffiansharifahsaffinas disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach
AT mohammednawiazmawati disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach
AT hodrozita disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach
AT abdulmanafmohdrizal disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach
AT chanhuankeat disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach
AT abuhassanmuhammadradzi disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach