Cargando…
Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599752 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S359450 |
_version_ | 1784709994343563264 |
---|---|
author | Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati Hod, Rozita Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal Chan, Huan-Keat Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi |
author_facet | Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati Hod, Rozita Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal Chan, Huan-Keat Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi |
author_sort | Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted through Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCOHost. Full-text guidelines which were published between 2011 and 2021, along with guidelines which provided recommendations on CRC screening in average-risk individuals, were included in the review. However, guidelines focusing only on a single screening modality were excluded. Fourteen guidelines fulfilling the eligibility criteria were retained for the final review and analysis. Quality assessment of each guideline was performed using the AGREE II instrument. Disparities in guidelines identified in this review were classified into ecological (screening modalities and strategies), biological (recommended age, gender and ethnicities), and social (smoking history, socioeconomic status, and behavior) factors. In general, unstandardized practices in CRC screening for average-risk individuals are likely attributable to the inconsistent and non-specific recommendations in the literature. This review calls on stakeholders and policymakers to review the existing colorectal cancer screening practices and pursue standardization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9115807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91158072022-05-19 Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati Hod, Rozita Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal Chan, Huan-Keat Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted through Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCOHost. Full-text guidelines which were published between 2011 and 2021, along with guidelines which provided recommendations on CRC screening in average-risk individuals, were included in the review. However, guidelines focusing only on a single screening modality were excluded. Fourteen guidelines fulfilling the eligibility criteria were retained for the final review and analysis. Quality assessment of each guideline was performed using the AGREE II instrument. Disparities in guidelines identified in this review were classified into ecological (screening modalities and strategies), biological (recommended age, gender and ethnicities), and social (smoking history, socioeconomic status, and behavior) factors. In general, unstandardized practices in CRC screening for average-risk individuals are likely attributable to the inconsistent and non-specific recommendations in the literature. This review calls on stakeholders and policymakers to review the existing colorectal cancer screening practices and pursue standardization. Dove 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9115807/ /pubmed/35599752 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S359450 Text en © 2022 Syed Soffian et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Syed Soffian, Sharifah Saffinas Mohammed Nawi, Azmawati Hod, Rozita Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal Chan, Huan-Keat Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach |
title | Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach |
title_full | Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach |
title_fullStr | Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach |
title_short | Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach |
title_sort | disparities in recommendations for colorectal cancer screening among average-risk individuals: an ecobiosocial approach |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599752 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S359450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT syedsoffiansharifahsaffinas disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach AT mohammednawiazmawati disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach AT hodrozita disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach AT abdulmanafmohdrizal disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach AT chanhuankeat disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach AT abuhassanmuhammadradzi disparitiesinrecommendationsforcolorectalcancerscreeningamongaverageriskindividualsanecobiosocialapproach |