Cargando…

Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study intended to analyse the effectiveness of compression only life support–cardiopulmonary resuscitation (COLS–CPR) training based on knowledge acquired among non-medical staff. A Google questionnaire form was used as an interventional tool. METHODS: The study was conduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kerketta, Carolin Smita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116765/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340786
_version_ 1784710179441344512
author Kerketta, Carolin Smita
author_facet Kerketta, Carolin Smita
author_sort Kerketta, Carolin Smita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study intended to analyse the effectiveness of compression only life support–cardiopulmonary resuscitation (COLS–CPR) training based on knowledge acquired among non-medical staff. A Google questionnaire form was used as an interventional tool. METHODS: The study was conducted among 300 non-medical staff. Study design: It was an interventional study where the effect of COLS–CPR training was evaluated based on the pre-training and post-training assessment score. Study participants: Security guards, ambulance drivers, and the house-keeping facility of our hospital were included in the study. Intervention: Training was conducted for 7 days through lecture, audio-visual display, and demonstration, and then, hands on session was conducted at the end of each training. The Google form questionnaire consisted of COLS meaning, rate, depth of compression, usefulness, etc. RESULTS: The analysis of the questionnaire among 300 non-medical staffs was performed by IBPM software version 20 with the paired t-test. For the pre-test, questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, the correct answers were 82%, 20%, 15%, 5%, >80%, and <10%, respectively. In the post-test, the correct answers for post-test questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were 100%, 100%, 100%, 67%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. A p value of <0.01 suggested that training was highly effective and made a statistically significant difference in knowledge of the participants. CONCLUSION: Among non-medical staff, this study emphasises the cognitive approach to the general perception and skill of COLS. Hence, formal refresher training and experience enhance the knowledge of CPR, which can save many lives! COLS Google form questionnaire.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91167652022-05-19 Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff Kerketta, Carolin Smita Indian J Anaesth Kops Award Abstracts: Pain BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study intended to analyse the effectiveness of compression only life support–cardiopulmonary resuscitation (COLS–CPR) training based on knowledge acquired among non-medical staff. A Google questionnaire form was used as an interventional tool. METHODS: The study was conducted among 300 non-medical staff. Study design: It was an interventional study where the effect of COLS–CPR training was evaluated based on the pre-training and post-training assessment score. Study participants: Security guards, ambulance drivers, and the house-keeping facility of our hospital were included in the study. Intervention: Training was conducted for 7 days through lecture, audio-visual display, and demonstration, and then, hands on session was conducted at the end of each training. The Google form questionnaire consisted of COLS meaning, rate, depth of compression, usefulness, etc. RESULTS: The analysis of the questionnaire among 300 non-medical staffs was performed by IBPM software version 20 with the paired t-test. For the pre-test, questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, the correct answers were 82%, 20%, 15%, 5%, >80%, and <10%, respectively. In the post-test, the correct answers for post-test questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were 100%, 100%, 100%, 67%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. A p value of <0.01 suggested that training was highly effective and made a statistically significant difference in knowledge of the participants. CONCLUSION: Among non-medical staff, this study emphasises the cognitive approach to the general perception and skill of COLS. Hence, formal refresher training and experience enhance the knowledge of CPR, which can save many lives! COLS Google form questionnaire. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116765/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340786 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Kops Award Abstracts: Pain
Kerketta, Carolin Smita
Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
title Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
title_full Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
title_fullStr Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
title_full_unstemmed Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
title_short Abstract No.: ABS3313: Current scenario: Knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
title_sort abstract no.: abs3313: current scenario: knowledge of compression only life support among non-medical staff
topic Kops Award Abstracts: Pain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116765/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340786
work_keys_str_mv AT kerkettacarolinsmita abstractnoabs3313currentscenarioknowledgeofcompressiononlylifesupportamongnonmedicalstaff