Cargando…

Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Dural puncture epidural technique (DPE) is where the dura is punctured but no intrathecal drug is given. thus avoiding potential side effects of intrathecal drugs. The goal of our study was to find whether DPE technique provides safe and better quality of analgesia compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pedapenki, Sai Krishna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116791/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340686
_version_ 1784710185886941184
author Pedapenki, Sai Krishna
author_facet Pedapenki, Sai Krishna
author_sort Pedapenki, Sai Krishna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Dural puncture epidural technique (DPE) is where the dura is punctured but no intrathecal drug is given. thus avoiding potential side effects of intrathecal drugs. The goal of our study was to find whether DPE technique provides safe and better quality of analgesia compared to CSE. METHODS: 60 parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) grade ll were divided into two groups. In DPE group, dura was punctured with spinal needle followed by insertion of epidural catheter. A test dose of 3ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline was given followed by 5ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. In CSE group, 1.25mg of 0.25% plain bupivacaine with 20µg fentanyl wasgiven in subarachnoid space and epidural catheter was threaded Background infusions were given in both the groups. RESULTS: The onset time of analgesia was 460.67+/-72.96 seconds (7.67 min.) in DPE. While with CSE it was223.33+/-50 seconds (3.8 min). The time for the 1st top up, was 135.23± 22.05 minutes in group DPE and 135.67 ± 13.19 minutes in group CSE. The mean duration of labour was 245.87 ± 31.18 minutes in Group DPE and 238.23 ± 34.03 minutes in CSE group (p =0.369). The maternal haemodynamic changes were similar in both study groups. In group DPE, 80% (24) patients had normal vaginal delivery 3 (10%) underwent lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), 3 (10%) had instrumental delivery. In group CSE 73.3% (22) patients had normal vaginal delivery while 13 % (4) each underwent LSCS and instrumental forceps delivery (p=0.83). There was no significant difference in motor block between the two groups( p values greater than 0.05). Eight patients (26.7%) reported pruritus in CSE group while none in the group DPE (p = 0.005). Seven patients reported nausea in group CSE against one in group DPE (p =0.05).Foetal bradycardia was more in CSE(6) compared to DPE(1)( p=0.10). APGAR score was more than 7 in both groups. CONCLUSION: The quality of analgesia was good with both DPE and CSE, though onset of analgesia was slightly faster in CSE group. The maternal and foetal outcomes were better with DPE group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91167912022-05-19 Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study. Pedapenki, Sai Krishna Indian J Anaesth Kops Award Abstracts: Obstetric Anaesthesia BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Dural puncture epidural technique (DPE) is where the dura is punctured but no intrathecal drug is given. thus avoiding potential side effects of intrathecal drugs. The goal of our study was to find whether DPE technique provides safe and better quality of analgesia compared to CSE. METHODS: 60 parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) grade ll were divided into two groups. In DPE group, dura was punctured with spinal needle followed by insertion of epidural catheter. A test dose of 3ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline was given followed by 5ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. In CSE group, 1.25mg of 0.25% plain bupivacaine with 20µg fentanyl wasgiven in subarachnoid space and epidural catheter was threaded Background infusions were given in both the groups. RESULTS: The onset time of analgesia was 460.67+/-72.96 seconds (7.67 min.) in DPE. While with CSE it was223.33+/-50 seconds (3.8 min). The time for the 1st top up, was 135.23± 22.05 minutes in group DPE and 135.67 ± 13.19 minutes in group CSE. The mean duration of labour was 245.87 ± 31.18 minutes in Group DPE and 238.23 ± 34.03 minutes in CSE group (p =0.369). The maternal haemodynamic changes were similar in both study groups. In group DPE, 80% (24) patients had normal vaginal delivery 3 (10%) underwent lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), 3 (10%) had instrumental delivery. In group CSE 73.3% (22) patients had normal vaginal delivery while 13 % (4) each underwent LSCS and instrumental forceps delivery (p=0.83). There was no significant difference in motor block between the two groups( p values greater than 0.05). Eight patients (26.7%) reported pruritus in CSE group while none in the group DPE (p = 0.005). Seven patients reported nausea in group CSE against one in group DPE (p =0.05).Foetal bradycardia was more in CSE(6) compared to DPE(1)( p=0.10). APGAR score was more than 7 in both groups. CONCLUSION: The quality of analgesia was good with both DPE and CSE, though onset of analgesia was slightly faster in CSE group. The maternal and foetal outcomes were better with DPE group. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116791/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340686 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Kops Award Abstracts: Obstetric Anaesthesia
Pedapenki, Sai Krishna
Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.
title Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.
title_full Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.
title_fullStr Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.
title_full_unstemmed Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.
title_short Abstract No. : ABS0549: Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural Technique for labour analgesia. A prospective randomised study.
title_sort abstract no. : abs0549: comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with combined spinal epidural technique for labour analgesia. a prospective randomised study.
topic Kops Award Abstracts: Obstetric Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116791/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340686
work_keys_str_mv AT pedapenkisaikrishna abstractnoabs0549comparisonofduralpunctureepiduraltechniquewithcombinedspinalepiduraltechniqueforlabouranalgesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy