Cargando…

Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We hypothesised that blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) separately may provide an additional advantage to the peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block in terms of duration of analgesia and patient comfort. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, double-blinded, ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Srivastawa, Surabhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116807/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340667
_version_ 1784710189727875072
author Srivastawa, Surabhi
author_facet Srivastawa, Surabhi
author_sort Srivastawa, Surabhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We hypothesised that blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) separately may provide an additional advantage to the peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block in terms of duration of analgesia and patient comfort. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, double-blinded, randomised study comparing the effect of PENG with that of the PENG Plus LFCN block on the duration of analgesia in fractured hip surgery. Rest and Dynamic pain scores for 24 hours were recoded as primary objectives. The duration of analgesia, the time of administration of the block until numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4, the ease of spinal positioning, and side effects were recorded as secondary outcomes. METHODS: A total of 124 patients of age group 18 to 80 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1–3, were randomised into two groups. The ultra-sound-guided PENG block with ropivacaine 0.5% 30 ml and dexamethasone 8 mg was given in group A and ropivacaine 0.5% 25 ml and 5 ml at LFCN separately was given in group B. The NRS after 20 minutes, 25 minutes, and 30 minutes was noted. The ease of spinal positioning was also noted. The NRS at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours was noted in resting and movement. Any side effects were documented and treated as a hospital protocol. All patients were given a combined spinal epidural with injection bupivacaine 0.5 per cent 1.6 ml with fentanyl 20 µg. Injection paracetamol 1 gram was added 8 hourly in both the groups as a part of multi-modal analgesia. Injection tramadol 25 mg was given if NRS exceeded 4 through a patient-controlled analgesia only bolus dose, a lock-out of 10 minutes, 4 hourly, limit 100 mg, as rescue analgesia. RESULTS: NRS at rest and movement in group A (PENG) mean [inter-quartile range (IQR)] = 3 (3-2), group B (PENG+LFCN) 2 (2-1), respectively. Time to first analgesic request mean (IQR) group A 9.04 (12.5-0), group B 12.12 (14-0), ease of spinal positioning group A 3 (3-2), group B 3 (3-2). CONCLUSION: The PENG block is an effective block for fractured hip surgeries in providing ease of spinal positioning and post-operative analgesia, and if PENG is combined with the LFCN block, the post-operative analgesia is enhanced by increasing the duration and reduction in the pain score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91168072022-05-19 Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study Srivastawa, Surabhi Indian J Anaesth Ludhiana E Poster Award Abstracts BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We hypothesised that blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) separately may provide an additional advantage to the peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block in terms of duration of analgesia and patient comfort. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, double-blinded, randomised study comparing the effect of PENG with that of the PENG Plus LFCN block on the duration of analgesia in fractured hip surgery. Rest and Dynamic pain scores for 24 hours were recoded as primary objectives. The duration of analgesia, the time of administration of the block until numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4, the ease of spinal positioning, and side effects were recorded as secondary outcomes. METHODS: A total of 124 patients of age group 18 to 80 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1–3, were randomised into two groups. The ultra-sound-guided PENG block with ropivacaine 0.5% 30 ml and dexamethasone 8 mg was given in group A and ropivacaine 0.5% 25 ml and 5 ml at LFCN separately was given in group B. The NRS after 20 minutes, 25 minutes, and 30 minutes was noted. The ease of spinal positioning was also noted. The NRS at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours was noted in resting and movement. Any side effects were documented and treated as a hospital protocol. All patients were given a combined spinal epidural with injection bupivacaine 0.5 per cent 1.6 ml with fentanyl 20 µg. Injection paracetamol 1 gram was added 8 hourly in both the groups as a part of multi-modal analgesia. Injection tramadol 25 mg was given if NRS exceeded 4 through a patient-controlled analgesia only bolus dose, a lock-out of 10 minutes, 4 hourly, limit 100 mg, as rescue analgesia. RESULTS: NRS at rest and movement in group A (PENG) mean [inter-quartile range (IQR)] = 3 (3-2), group B (PENG+LFCN) 2 (2-1), respectively. Time to first analgesic request mean (IQR) group A 9.04 (12.5-0), group B 12.12 (14-0), ease of spinal positioning group A 3 (3-2), group B 3 (3-2). CONCLUSION: The PENG block is an effective block for fractured hip surgeries in providing ease of spinal positioning and post-operative analgesia, and if PENG is combined with the LFCN block, the post-operative analgesia is enhanced by increasing the duration and reduction in the pain score. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116807/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340667 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Ludhiana E Poster Award Abstracts
Srivastawa, Surabhi
Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
title Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
title_full Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
title_fullStr Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
title_short Comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (Peng block) and the Peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
title_sort comparison of the ultra-sound-guided peri-capsular nerve group block (peng block) and the peng block with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (lfcn) for the fractured hip surgeries – an aprospective, double-blinded randomised study
topic Ludhiana E Poster Award Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116807/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340667
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastawasurabhi comparisonoftheultrasoundguidedpericapsularnervegroupblockpengblockandthepengblockwiththelateralfemoralcutaneousnerveblocklfcnforthefracturedhipsurgeriesanaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedstudy