Cargando…

Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: KC, Spoorthi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116825/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340721
_version_ 1784710194333220864
author KC, Spoorthi
author_facet KC, Spoorthi
author_sort KC, Spoorthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning of spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: 70 patients( 35 in each group) of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, either sex, aged between 18-70 years, posted for proximal femur surgeries were randomly allocated in two groups. All patients in group B received 30ml of 0.25%bupivacaine and in groupR 30ml of 0.25%ropivacaine was administered for FICB.. Onset of sensory block was noted every two minutes using pinprick method. Fifteen minutes later spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in sitting position. Analgesia during positioning was assessed. The quality of patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia was recorded. Vitals were monitored before(baseline) and after block for every 5minutes until 15minutes. The time for first rescue analgesic request and 24h opioid consumption was noted. RESULTS: Mean onset of FICB in group B was 6.17±1.403 minutes and group R was 10.51±1.772 minutes which was statistically significant (p value <0.001). There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale(VAS) during positioning and quality of positioning in both groups. Time to first rescue analgesia in group B was 409.71±85.146 minutes and groupR was 445.71±77.736 minutes (p value 0.0069) but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in 24hour opioid consumption among the two groups. CONCLUSION: FICB provides analgesia which helps in positioning of the patient for spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine having faster onset of action compared to ropivacaine but provides comparable duration of analgesia and 24 hour opioid consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91168252022-05-19 Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia KC, Spoorthi Indian J Anaesth Jaipur Award Abstracts: Acute/Perioperative Pain BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning of spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: 70 patients( 35 in each group) of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, either sex, aged between 18-70 years, posted for proximal femur surgeries were randomly allocated in two groups. All patients in group B received 30ml of 0.25%bupivacaine and in groupR 30ml of 0.25%ropivacaine was administered for FICB.. Onset of sensory block was noted every two minutes using pinprick method. Fifteen minutes later spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in sitting position. Analgesia during positioning was assessed. The quality of patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia was recorded. Vitals were monitored before(baseline) and after block for every 5minutes until 15minutes. The time for first rescue analgesic request and 24h opioid consumption was noted. RESULTS: Mean onset of FICB in group B was 6.17±1.403 minutes and group R was 10.51±1.772 minutes which was statistically significant (p value <0.001). There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale(VAS) during positioning and quality of positioning in both groups. Time to first rescue analgesia in group B was 409.71±85.146 minutes and groupR was 445.71±77.736 minutes (p value 0.0069) but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in 24hour opioid consumption among the two groups. CONCLUSION: FICB provides analgesia which helps in positioning of the patient for spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine having faster onset of action compared to ropivacaine but provides comparable duration of analgesia and 24 hour opioid consumption. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116825/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340721 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Jaipur Award Abstracts: Acute/Perioperative Pain
KC, Spoorthi
Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
title Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
title_full Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
title_fullStr Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
title_short Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
title_sort abstract no.: abs1604: a comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
topic Jaipur Award Abstracts: Acute/Perioperative Pain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116825/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340721
work_keys_str_mv AT kcspoorthi abstractnoabs1604acomparativestudyofbupivacaineversusropivacaineinpreoperativefasciailiacacompartmentblockinpatientspostedforproximalfemurfracturesurgeriesunderspinalanaesthesia