Cargando…
Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116825/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340721 |
_version_ | 1784710194333220864 |
---|---|
author | KC, Spoorthi |
author_facet | KC, Spoorthi |
author_sort | KC, Spoorthi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning of spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: 70 patients( 35 in each group) of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, either sex, aged between 18-70 years, posted for proximal femur surgeries were randomly allocated in two groups. All patients in group B received 30ml of 0.25%bupivacaine and in groupR 30ml of 0.25%ropivacaine was administered for FICB.. Onset of sensory block was noted every two minutes using pinprick method. Fifteen minutes later spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in sitting position. Analgesia during positioning was assessed. The quality of patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia was recorded. Vitals were monitored before(baseline) and after block for every 5minutes until 15minutes. The time for first rescue analgesic request and 24h opioid consumption was noted. RESULTS: Mean onset of FICB in group B was 6.17±1.403 minutes and group R was 10.51±1.772 minutes which was statistically significant (p value <0.001). There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale(VAS) during positioning and quality of positioning in both groups. Time to first rescue analgesia in group B was 409.71±85.146 minutes and groupR was 445.71±77.736 minutes (p value 0.0069) but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in 24hour opioid consumption among the two groups. CONCLUSION: FICB provides analgesia which helps in positioning of the patient for spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine having faster onset of action compared to ropivacaine but provides comparable duration of analgesia and 24 hour opioid consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9116825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91168252022-05-19 Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia KC, Spoorthi Indian J Anaesth Jaipur Award Abstracts: Acute/Perioperative Pain BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning of spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: 70 patients( 35 in each group) of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, either sex, aged between 18-70 years, posted for proximal femur surgeries were randomly allocated in two groups. All patients in group B received 30ml of 0.25%bupivacaine and in groupR 30ml of 0.25%ropivacaine was administered for FICB.. Onset of sensory block was noted every two minutes using pinprick method. Fifteen minutes later spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in sitting position. Analgesia during positioning was assessed. The quality of patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia was recorded. Vitals were monitored before(baseline) and after block for every 5minutes until 15minutes. The time for first rescue analgesic request and 24h opioid consumption was noted. RESULTS: Mean onset of FICB in group B was 6.17±1.403 minutes and group R was 10.51±1.772 minutes which was statistically significant (p value <0.001). There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale(VAS) during positioning and quality of positioning in both groups. Time to first rescue analgesia in group B was 409.71±85.146 minutes and groupR was 445.71±77.736 minutes (p value 0.0069) but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in 24hour opioid consumption among the two groups. CONCLUSION: FICB provides analgesia which helps in positioning of the patient for spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine having faster onset of action compared to ropivacaine but provides comparable duration of analgesia and 24 hour opioid consumption. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116825/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340721 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Jaipur Award Abstracts: Acute/Perioperative Pain KC, Spoorthi Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
title | Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
title_full | Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
title_fullStr | Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
title_short | Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
title_sort | abstract no.: abs1604: a comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia |
topic | Jaipur Award Abstracts: Acute/Perioperative Pain |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116825/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340721 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kcspoorthi abstractnoabs1604acomparativestudyofbupivacaineversusropivacaineinpreoperativefasciailiacacompartmentblockinpatientspostedforproximalfemurfracturesurgeriesunderspinalanaesthesia |