Cargando…

5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proper positioning is essential in laryngoscopy for optimal laryngeal visualisation. In sniffing position (SP), the neck is flexed 35° on the chest and the head extended at the atlanto-occipital joint to produce a 15° angle between the facial and the horizontal planes in normal-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: ChavanPritamDilip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116837/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340657
_version_ 1784710197369896960
author ChavanPritamDilip,
author_facet ChavanPritamDilip,
author_sort ChavanPritamDilip,
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proper positioning is essential in laryngoscopy for optimal laryngeal visualisation. In sniffing position (SP), the neck is flexed 35° on the chest and the head extended at the atlanto-occipital joint to produce a 15° angle between the facial and the horizontal planes in normal-weight patients. This was considered the optimal position for successful direct laryngoscopy.Rapid Airway Management Position (RAMP) was introduced by Collins in 2004 in which the patient’s external auditory meatus and sternal notch are in the same horizontal plane. METHODS: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval for a randomised prospective study, 50 patients of age 18-60 years, with body mass index < 25, of American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) I and II, having Mallampati classification (MPC) I and II, mouth opening angle (MOA)≥2, thyromental distance>6.5, undergoing routine elective surgery under general anaesthesia were divided into Group S (SP) and Group R(RAMP) (25 each). Patients in Group S were given 8 cm high pillow to elevate the occiput while that in Group R were laid on a ramp made of folded blankets. After laryngoscopy, both groups were compared for number of single attempt successful intubations, intubation time, Cormack Lehane (CL) view and need for ancillary manoeuvres. RESULTS: Intubation time with RAMP was significantly lesser than SP. (p < 0.0001). Also, RAMP was associated with greater number of single attempt intubations (p= 0.034), better CL view (p=0.041) and lesser number of ancillary maneuvers(p=0.03). CONCLUSION: RAMP is superior to SP in terms of better laryngeal view, faster intubation time and lesser need for external manoeuvres.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91168372022-05-19 5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients ChavanPritamDilip, Indian J Anaesth Tn Jha and Kp Chansoria Travel Grant Award Abstracts BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proper positioning is essential in laryngoscopy for optimal laryngeal visualisation. In sniffing position (SP), the neck is flexed 35° on the chest and the head extended at the atlanto-occipital joint to produce a 15° angle between the facial and the horizontal planes in normal-weight patients. This was considered the optimal position for successful direct laryngoscopy.Rapid Airway Management Position (RAMP) was introduced by Collins in 2004 in which the patient’s external auditory meatus and sternal notch are in the same horizontal plane. METHODS: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval for a randomised prospective study, 50 patients of age 18-60 years, with body mass index < 25, of American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) I and II, having Mallampati classification (MPC) I and II, mouth opening angle (MOA)≥2, thyromental distance>6.5, undergoing routine elective surgery under general anaesthesia were divided into Group S (SP) and Group R(RAMP) (25 each). Patients in Group S were given 8 cm high pillow to elevate the occiput while that in Group R were laid on a ramp made of folded blankets. After laryngoscopy, both groups were compared for number of single attempt successful intubations, intubation time, Cormack Lehane (CL) view and need for ancillary manoeuvres. RESULTS: Intubation time with RAMP was significantly lesser than SP. (p < 0.0001). Also, RAMP was associated with greater number of single attempt intubations (p= 0.034), better CL view (p=0.041) and lesser number of ancillary maneuvers(p=0.03). CONCLUSION: RAMP is superior to SP in terms of better laryngeal view, faster intubation time and lesser need for external manoeuvres. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340657 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Tn Jha and Kp Chansoria Travel Grant Award Abstracts
ChavanPritamDilip,
5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
title 5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
title_full 5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
title_fullStr 5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
title_full_unstemmed 5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
title_short 5: Comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
title_sort 5: comparison of intubating conditions with sniffing versus ramp position in non-obese patients
topic Tn Jha and Kp Chansoria Travel Grant Award Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116837/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340657
work_keys_str_mv AT chavanpritamdilip 5comparisonofintubatingconditionswithsniffingversusramppositioninnonobesepatients