Cargando…
Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sciatic nerve can be blocked by various approaches. Our aim of the study was to compare the ease and time of performance by posterior subgluteus approach with the classic posterior approach along with a femoral block for lower limb surgeries using peripheral nerve stimulator (...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116854/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340733 |
_version_ | 1784710201497092096 |
---|---|
author | Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra |
author_facet | Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra |
author_sort | Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sciatic nerve can be blocked by various approaches. Our aim of the study was to compare the ease and time of performance by posterior subgluteus approach with the classic posterior approach along with a femoral block for lower limb surgeries using peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS). METHODS: Patients belonging to ASA grade I,II,III, aged 18-65 years were randomly allocated in two groups with 30 in each group: group L Labat’s posterior approach and group S subgluteus approach RESULTS: The time from needle insertion to sciatic stimulation was 60 sec in Group L and 32 sec in group S. Depth in cm was 6.7±1.2 and 4.5±1.3 in group L and Group S respectively. The number of attempts to perform block in group L was 1.97±1.12 and 1.3±0.59 in group S. The discomfort during the procedure was less in group S compared to group L. In group L, 5 patients [16.6%] and 2 patients [6.6 %] in group S required intraoperative analgesia. CONCLUSION: PNS guided posterior subgluteus approach for sciatic nerve block can be considered as a safe, reliable and useful alternative, requires lesser attempts, time to perform and less discomfort compared to the Labat’s classic approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9116854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91168542022-05-19 Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra Indian J Anaesth Ish Narani E Poster Award Abstracts BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sciatic nerve can be blocked by various approaches. Our aim of the study was to compare the ease and time of performance by posterior subgluteus approach with the classic posterior approach along with a femoral block for lower limb surgeries using peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS). METHODS: Patients belonging to ASA grade I,II,III, aged 18-65 years were randomly allocated in two groups with 30 in each group: group L Labat’s posterior approach and group S subgluteus approach RESULTS: The time from needle insertion to sciatic stimulation was 60 sec in Group L and 32 sec in group S. Depth in cm was 6.7±1.2 and 4.5±1.3 in group L and Group S respectively. The number of attempts to perform block in group L was 1.97±1.12 and 1.3±0.59 in group S. The discomfort during the procedure was less in group S compared to group L. In group L, 5 patients [16.6%] and 2 patients [6.6 %] in group S required intraoperative analgesia. CONCLUSION: PNS guided posterior subgluteus approach for sciatic nerve block can be considered as a safe, reliable and useful alternative, requires lesser attempts, time to perform and less discomfort compared to the Labat’s classic approach. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116854/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340733 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Ish Narani E Poster Award Abstracts Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
title | Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
title_full | Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
title_fullStr | Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
title_full_unstemmed | Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
title_short | Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
title_sort | abstract no.: abs2090: comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries |
topic | Ish Narani E Poster Award Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116854/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pattanayaktuhinsubhra abstractnoabs2090comparisonofsubgluteusapproachwithclassicposteriorapproachforsciaticnerveblockwithfemoralblockforbelowkneesurgeries |