Cargando…

Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sciatic nerve can be blocked by various approaches. Our aim of the study was to compare the ease and time of performance by posterior subgluteus approach with the classic posterior approach along with a femoral block for lower limb surgeries using peripheral nerve stimulator (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116854/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340733
_version_ 1784710201497092096
author Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra
author_facet Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra
author_sort Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sciatic nerve can be blocked by various approaches. Our aim of the study was to compare the ease and time of performance by posterior subgluteus approach with the classic posterior approach along with a femoral block for lower limb surgeries using peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS). METHODS: Patients belonging to ASA grade I,II,III, aged 18-65 years were randomly allocated in two groups with 30 in each group: group L Labat’s posterior approach and group S subgluteus approach RESULTS: The time from needle insertion to sciatic stimulation was 60 sec in Group L and 32 sec in group S. Depth in cm was 6.7±1.2 and 4.5±1.3 in group L and Group S respectively. The number of attempts to perform block in group L was 1.97±1.12 and 1.3±0.59 in group S. The discomfort during the procedure was less in group S compared to group L. In group L, 5 patients [16.6%] and 2 patients [6.6 %] in group S required intraoperative analgesia. CONCLUSION: PNS guided posterior subgluteus approach for sciatic nerve block can be considered as a safe, reliable and useful alternative, requires lesser attempts, time to perform and less discomfort compared to the Labat’s classic approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91168542022-05-19 Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra Indian J Anaesth Ish Narani E Poster Award Abstracts BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sciatic nerve can be blocked by various approaches. Our aim of the study was to compare the ease and time of performance by posterior subgluteus approach with the classic posterior approach along with a femoral block for lower limb surgeries using peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS). METHODS: Patients belonging to ASA grade I,II,III, aged 18-65 years were randomly allocated in two groups with 30 in each group: group L Labat’s posterior approach and group S subgluteus approach RESULTS: The time from needle insertion to sciatic stimulation was 60 sec in Group L and 32 sec in group S. Depth in cm was 6.7±1.2 and 4.5±1.3 in group L and Group S respectively. The number of attempts to perform block in group L was 1.97±1.12 and 1.3±0.59 in group S. The discomfort during the procedure was less in group S compared to group L. In group L, 5 patients [16.6%] and 2 patients [6.6 %] in group S required intraoperative analgesia. CONCLUSION: PNS guided posterior subgluteus approach for sciatic nerve block can be considered as a safe, reliable and useful alternative, requires lesser attempts, time to perform and less discomfort compared to the Labat’s classic approach. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116854/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340733 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Ish Narani E Poster Award Abstracts
Pattanayak, Tuhinsubhra
Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
title Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
title_full Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
title_fullStr Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
title_short Abstract No.: ABS2090: Comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
title_sort abstract no.: abs2090: comparison of subgluteus approach with classic posterior approach for sciatic nerve block with femoral block for below knee surgeries
topic Ish Narani E Poster Award Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116854/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340733
work_keys_str_mv AT pattanayaktuhinsubhra abstractnoabs2090comparisonofsubgluteusapproachwithclassicposteriorapproachforsciaticnerveblockwithfemoralblockforbelowkneesurgeries