Cargando…

Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND & AIMS: 1.The primary objective of the present study wasto compare anaesthetic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl in terms of : Perioperative hemodynamics, Propofol consumption, Requirment of Rescue analgesia and also to compare postoperative analgesia and sedation between th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Panchal, Harsh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116864/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340728
_version_ 1784710203932934144
author Panchal, Harsh
author_facet Panchal, Harsh
author_sort Panchal, Harsh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: 1.The primary objective of the present study wasto compare anaesthetic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl in terms of : Perioperative hemodynamics, Propofol consumption, Requirment of Rescue analgesia and also to compare postoperative analgesia and sedation between the two while the secondary objective was to assess any undesirable side effects if any 2. METHODS: The present study was a prospective, randomized, double blind study conducted on 60 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA I&II aged between 20-60 years undergoing elective laproscopic surgeries. Patients were divided in two groups. GroupD received Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg loading dose over 10 min, followed by 0.5 µg/kg/hr continous infusion &GroupF received fentanyl 2 µg/kg bolus followed by 0.5 µg/kg/hr by continous infusion. Target controlled infusion (TCI) Propofol infusion was given to achieve target site concentration of 3-4 µg/kg in both groups. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP),systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, percentage saturation of oxygen (Spo2), bispectral index monitoring (BIS) were recorded at induction,intubation, at pneumoperitoneum, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 120 min, 180 min & at extubation.Adverse haemodynamic events were noted. RESULTS: Group D showed significant fall in HR, BP whereas it remained constantly high in Group F. Total mean requirement of propofol, in Group D patients was found to be 57.99% lower than GroupF. Requirement of rescue analgesia in form of opioid was significantly less in Group D 18% as compared to 30% in Group F. Post-operative analgesia requirement was earlier in group F. Sedation scores were higher in group D at all time points. Patients had bradycardia and hypotension in Group D. Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) was 3 times lower in Group D. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine is better adjuvant compared to fentanyl when combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol. Iteffectively blunts various stress responses during surgery and maintains hemodynamic stability,reducespropofol requirements, provides better analgesia with few side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9116864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91168642022-05-19 Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia Panchal, Harsh Indian J Anaesth Kops Award Abstracts: Clinical Pharmacology BACKGROUND & AIMS: 1.The primary objective of the present study wasto compare anaesthetic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl in terms of : Perioperative hemodynamics, Propofol consumption, Requirment of Rescue analgesia and also to compare postoperative analgesia and sedation between the two while the secondary objective was to assess any undesirable side effects if any 2. METHODS: The present study was a prospective, randomized, double blind study conducted on 60 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA I&II aged between 20-60 years undergoing elective laproscopic surgeries. Patients were divided in two groups. GroupD received Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg loading dose over 10 min, followed by 0.5 µg/kg/hr continous infusion &GroupF received fentanyl 2 µg/kg bolus followed by 0.5 µg/kg/hr by continous infusion. Target controlled infusion (TCI) Propofol infusion was given to achieve target site concentration of 3-4 µg/kg in both groups. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP),systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, percentage saturation of oxygen (Spo2), bispectral index monitoring (BIS) were recorded at induction,intubation, at pneumoperitoneum, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 120 min, 180 min & at extubation.Adverse haemodynamic events were noted. RESULTS: Group D showed significant fall in HR, BP whereas it remained constantly high in Group F. Total mean requirement of propofol, in Group D patients was found to be 57.99% lower than GroupF. Requirement of rescue analgesia in form of opioid was significantly less in Group D 18% as compared to 30% in Group F. Post-operative analgesia requirement was earlier in group F. Sedation scores were higher in group D at all time points. Patients had bradycardia and hypotension in Group D. Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) was 3 times lower in Group D. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine is better adjuvant compared to fentanyl when combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol. Iteffectively blunts various stress responses during surgery and maintains hemodynamic stability,reducespropofol requirements, provides better analgesia with few side effects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9116864/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340728 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Kops Award Abstracts: Clinical Pharmacology
Panchal, Harsh
Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
title Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
title_full Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
title_fullStr Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
title_short Abstract No.: ABS1979: Effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
title_sort abstract no.: abs1979: effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl combined with target controlled infusion of propofol for laproscopic surgery under general anaesthesia
topic Kops Award Abstracts: Clinical Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116864/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.340728
work_keys_str_mv AT panchalharsh abstractnoabs1979effectsofdexmedetomidineversusfentanylcombinedwithtargetcontrolledinfusionofpropofolforlaproscopicsurgeryundergeneralanaesthesia