Cargando…
Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation
This study examines the effects of breast augmentation on women who underwent surgery in Germany regarding their quality of life (QOL) and scar quality using patient-reported surveys. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an increase in women’s QOL after surgery compared with preope...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004313 |
_version_ | 1784710222471757824 |
---|---|
author | Jawanrudi, Pedram Bender, Richard Pennig, Dietmar Taskin, Berivan Schäller, Sebastian Al-Malat, Tarek Mannil, Lijo |
author_facet | Jawanrudi, Pedram Bender, Richard Pennig, Dietmar Taskin, Berivan Schäller, Sebastian Al-Malat, Tarek Mannil, Lijo |
author_sort | Jawanrudi, Pedram |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examines the effects of breast augmentation on women who underwent surgery in Germany regarding their quality of life (QOL) and scar quality using patient-reported surveys. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an increase in women’s QOL after surgery compared with preoperative, and to evaluate their postoperative scar quality. METHODS: A prospective monocentric study was conducted on 50 women who underwent breast augmentation with nanotextured silicone-filled implants between October 2018 and December 2020. Of these women, 21 (42%) participated in the preoperative survey (BREAST-Q), and 50 (100%) participated in the postoperative survey (BREAST-Q and POSAS). We used the BREAST-Q questionnaire to measure patients’ QOL and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to determine the scar quality. RESULTS: Psychosocial well-being increased by 34.3 points according to the Q-score, sexual well-being increased by 35.7, and satisfaction with breasts increased by 48.8. Physical well-being decreased by 12 points. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale mean scores, according to the patient/observer, are 3.8/2.5 for inframammary scars and 4.4/3.1 for periareolar scars. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we discovered that aesthetic breast augmentation with nanotextured silicone-filled breast implants is associated with significantly higher scores for patient satisfaction, which indicates an improvement in women’s QOL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9116954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91169542022-05-25 Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation Jawanrudi, Pedram Bender, Richard Pennig, Dietmar Taskin, Berivan Schäller, Sebastian Al-Malat, Tarek Mannil, Lijo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic This study examines the effects of breast augmentation on women who underwent surgery in Germany regarding their quality of life (QOL) and scar quality using patient-reported surveys. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an increase in women’s QOL after surgery compared with preoperative, and to evaluate their postoperative scar quality. METHODS: A prospective monocentric study was conducted on 50 women who underwent breast augmentation with nanotextured silicone-filled implants between October 2018 and December 2020. Of these women, 21 (42%) participated in the preoperative survey (BREAST-Q), and 50 (100%) participated in the postoperative survey (BREAST-Q and POSAS). We used the BREAST-Q questionnaire to measure patients’ QOL and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to determine the scar quality. RESULTS: Psychosocial well-being increased by 34.3 points according to the Q-score, sexual well-being increased by 35.7, and satisfaction with breasts increased by 48.8. Physical well-being decreased by 12 points. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale mean scores, according to the patient/observer, are 3.8/2.5 for inframammary scars and 4.4/3.1 for periareolar scars. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we discovered that aesthetic breast augmentation with nanotextured silicone-filled breast implants is associated with significantly higher scores for patient satisfaction, which indicates an improvement in women’s QOL. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9116954/ /pubmed/35620506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004313 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Cosmetic Jawanrudi, Pedram Bender, Richard Pennig, Dietmar Taskin, Berivan Schäller, Sebastian Al-Malat, Tarek Mannil, Lijo Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation |
title | Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation |
title_full | Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation |
title_short | Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation |
title_sort | evaluation of quality of life (breast-q) and scar quality (posas) after breast augmentation |
topic | Cosmetic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jawanrudipedram evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation AT benderrichard evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation AT pennigdietmar evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation AT taskinberivan evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation AT schallersebastian evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation AT almalattarek evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation AT mannillijo evaluationofqualityoflifebreastqandscarqualityposasafterbreastaugmentation |