Cargando…

COVID-19 Living Overview of Evidence repository is highly comprehensive and can be used as a single source for COVID-19 studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 Living OVerview of Evidence (COVID-19 L·OVE) is a public repository and classification platform for COVID-19 articles. The repository contains more than 430,000 articles as of September 20, 2021 and intends to provide a one-stop shop for COVID-1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verdugo-Paiva, Francisca, Vergara, Camilo, Ávila, Camila, Castro-Guevara, Javier A., Cid, Josefina, Contreras, Valeria, Jara, Iván, Jiménez, Valentina, Lee, Min Ha, Muñoz, Magdalena, Rojas-Gómez, Ana María, Rosón-Rodríguez, Pablo, Serrano-Arévalo, Karen, Silva-Ruz, Iván, Vásquez-Laval, Juan, Zambrano-Achig, Paula, Zavadzki, Giovanna, Rada, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9116966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35597369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.001
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 Living OVerview of Evidence (COVID-19 L·OVE) is a public repository and classification platform for COVID-19 articles. The repository contains more than 430,000 articles as of September 20, 2021 and intends to provide a one-stop shop for COVID-19 evidence. Considering that systematic reviews conduct high-quality searches, this study assesses the comprehensiveness and currency of the repository against the total number of studies in a representative sample of COVID-19 systematic reviews. METHODS: Our sample was generated from all the studies included in the systematic reviews of COVID-19 published during April 2021. We estimated the comprehensiveness of COVID-19 L·OVE repository by determining how many of the individual studies in the sample were included in the COVID-19 L·OVE repository. We estimated the currency as the percentage of studies that was available in the COVID-19 L·OVE repository at the time the systematic reviews conducted their own search. RESULTS: We identified 83 eligible systematic reviews that included 2,132 studies. COVID-19 L·OVE had an overall comprehensiveness of 99.67% (2,125/2,132). The overall currency of the repository, that is, the proportion of articles that would have been obtained if the search of the reviews was conducted in COVID-19 L·OVE instead of searching the original sources, was 96.48% (2,057/2,132). Both the comprehensiveness and the currency were 100% for randomized trials (82/82). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 L·OVE repository is highly comprehensive and current. Using this repository instead of traditional manual searches in multiple databases can save a great amount of work to people conducting systematic reviews and would improve the comprehensiveness and timeliness of evidence syntheses. This tool is particularly important for supporting living evidence synthesis processes.