Cargando…
Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4266564 |
_version_ | 1784710246976978944 |
---|---|
author | Han, Zhenchuan Ren, Bowen Zhang, Long Ma, Chao Liu, Jianheng Li, Jiantao Liu, Xiao Liu, Qingzu Mao, Keya Tang, Peifu |
author_facet | Han, Zhenchuan Ren, Bowen Zhang, Long Ma, Chao Liu, Jianheng Li, Jiantao Liu, Xiao Liu, Qingzu Mao, Keya Tang, Peifu |
author_sort | Han, Zhenchuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45° cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9117058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91170582022-05-19 Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Han, Zhenchuan Ren, Bowen Zhang, Long Ma, Chao Liu, Jianheng Li, Jiantao Liu, Xiao Liu, Qingzu Mao, Keya Tang, Peifu Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45° cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate. Hindawi 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9117058/ /pubmed/35601152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4266564 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhenchuan Han et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Han, Zhenchuan Ren, Bowen Zhang, Long Ma, Chao Liu, Jianheng Li, Jiantao Liu, Xiao Liu, Qingzu Mao, Keya Tang, Peifu Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title | Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full | Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr | Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_short | Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_sort | finite element analysis of a novel fusion strategy in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4266564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanzhenchuan finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT renbowen finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT zhanglong finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT machao finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT liujianheng finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT lijiantao finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT liuxiao finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT liuqingzu finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT maokeya finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT tangpeifu finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion |