Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Zhenchuan, Ren, Bowen, Zhang, Long, Ma, Chao, Liu, Jianheng, Li, Jiantao, Liu, Xiao, Liu, Qingzu, Mao, Keya, Tang, Peifu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4266564
_version_ 1784710246976978944
author Han, Zhenchuan
Ren, Bowen
Zhang, Long
Ma, Chao
Liu, Jianheng
Li, Jiantao
Liu, Xiao
Liu, Qingzu
Mao, Keya
Tang, Peifu
author_facet Han, Zhenchuan
Ren, Bowen
Zhang, Long
Ma, Chao
Liu, Jianheng
Li, Jiantao
Liu, Xiao
Liu, Qingzu
Mao, Keya
Tang, Peifu
author_sort Han, Zhenchuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45° cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9117058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91170582022-05-19 Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Han, Zhenchuan Ren, Bowen Zhang, Long Ma, Chao Liu, Jianheng Li, Jiantao Liu, Xiao Liu, Qingzu Mao, Keya Tang, Peifu Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45° cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate. Hindawi 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9117058/ /pubmed/35601152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4266564 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhenchuan Han et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Han, Zhenchuan
Ren, Bowen
Zhang, Long
Ma, Chao
Liu, Jianheng
Li, Jiantao
Liu, Xiao
Liu, Qingzu
Mao, Keya
Tang, Peifu
Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_short Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_sort finite element analysis of a novel fusion strategy in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4266564
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzhenchuan finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT renbowen finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT zhanglong finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT machao finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT liujianheng finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT lijiantao finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT liuxiao finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT liuqingzu finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT maokeya finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT tangpeifu finiteelementanalysisofanovelfusionstrategyinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion