Cargando…
Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
Nicotine replacement therapy, in the form of nicotine patches, is commonly offered to pregnant women who smoke to help them to stop smoking, but this approach has limited efficacy in this population. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are also used by pregnant women who smoke but their safety and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0 |
_version_ | 1784710264191451136 |
---|---|
author | Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca Griffiths, Chris Walton, Robert McRobbie, Hayden Coleman, Tim Lewis, Sarah Whitemore, Rachel Clark, Miranda Ussher, Michael Sinclair, Lesley Seager, Emily Cooper, Sue Bauld, Linda Naughton, Felix Sasieni, Peter Manyonda, Isaac Myers Smith, Katie |
author_facet | Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca Griffiths, Chris Walton, Robert McRobbie, Hayden Coleman, Tim Lewis, Sarah Whitemore, Rachel Clark, Miranda Ussher, Michael Sinclair, Lesley Seager, Emily Cooper, Sue Bauld, Linda Naughton, Felix Sasieni, Peter Manyonda, Isaac Myers Smith, Katie |
author_sort | Hajek, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nicotine replacement therapy, in the form of nicotine patches, is commonly offered to pregnant women who smoke to help them to stop smoking, but this approach has limited efficacy in this population. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are also used by pregnant women who smoke but their safety and efficacy in pregnancy are unknown. Here, we report the results of a randomized controlled trial in 1,140 participants comparing refillable e-cigarettes with nicotine patches. Pregnant women who smoked were randomized to e-cigarettes (n = 569) or nicotine patches (n = 571). In the unadjusted analysis of the primary outcome, validated prolonged quit rates at the end of pregnancy in the two study arms were not significantly different (6.8% versus 4.4% in the e-cigarette and patch arms, respectively; relative risk (RR) = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.95–2.53, P = 0.08). However, some participants in the nicotine patch group also used e-cigarettes during the study. In a pre-specified sensitivity analysis excluding abstinent participants who used non-allocated products, e-cigarettes were more effective than patches (6.8% versus 3.6%; RR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.14–3.26, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes included adverse events and maternal and birth outcomes. The safety profile was found to be similar for both study products, however, low birthweight (<2,500 g) was less frequent in the e-cigarette arm (14.8% versus 9.6%; RR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.47–0.90, P = 0.01). Other adverse events and birth outcomes were similar in the two study arms. E-cigarettes might help women who are pregnant to stop smoking, and their safety for use in pregnancy is similar to that of nicotine patches. ISRCTN62025374. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9117131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91171312022-05-20 Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca Griffiths, Chris Walton, Robert McRobbie, Hayden Coleman, Tim Lewis, Sarah Whitemore, Rachel Clark, Miranda Ussher, Michael Sinclair, Lesley Seager, Emily Cooper, Sue Bauld, Linda Naughton, Felix Sasieni, Peter Manyonda, Isaac Myers Smith, Katie Nat Med Article Nicotine replacement therapy, in the form of nicotine patches, is commonly offered to pregnant women who smoke to help them to stop smoking, but this approach has limited efficacy in this population. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are also used by pregnant women who smoke but their safety and efficacy in pregnancy are unknown. Here, we report the results of a randomized controlled trial in 1,140 participants comparing refillable e-cigarettes with nicotine patches. Pregnant women who smoked were randomized to e-cigarettes (n = 569) or nicotine patches (n = 571). In the unadjusted analysis of the primary outcome, validated prolonged quit rates at the end of pregnancy in the two study arms were not significantly different (6.8% versus 4.4% in the e-cigarette and patch arms, respectively; relative risk (RR) = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.95–2.53, P = 0.08). However, some participants in the nicotine patch group also used e-cigarettes during the study. In a pre-specified sensitivity analysis excluding abstinent participants who used non-allocated products, e-cigarettes were more effective than patches (6.8% versus 3.6%; RR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.14–3.26, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes included adverse events and maternal and birth outcomes. The safety profile was found to be similar for both study products, however, low birthweight (<2,500 g) was less frequent in the e-cigarette arm (14.8% versus 9.6%; RR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.47–0.90, P = 0.01). Other adverse events and birth outcomes were similar in the two study arms. E-cigarettes might help women who are pregnant to stop smoking, and their safety for use in pregnancy is similar to that of nicotine patches. ISRCTN62025374. Nature Publishing Group US 2022-05-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9117131/ /pubmed/35577966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca Griffiths, Chris Walton, Robert McRobbie, Hayden Coleman, Tim Lewis, Sarah Whitemore, Rachel Clark, Miranda Ussher, Michael Sinclair, Lesley Seager, Emily Cooper, Sue Bauld, Linda Naughton, Felix Sasieni, Peter Manyonda, Isaac Myers Smith, Katie Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hajekpeter electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT przuljdunja electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pesolafrancesca electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT griffithschris electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT waltonrobert electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcrobbiehayden electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT colemantim electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lewissarah electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT whitemorerachel electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT clarkmiranda electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT usshermichael electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sinclairlesley electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT seageremily electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT coopersue electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bauldlinda electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT naughtonfelix electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sasienipeter electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT manyondaisaac electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT myerssmithkatie electroniccigarettesversusnicotinepatchesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyarandomizedcontrolledtrial |