Cargando…
Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The benefits of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain debated with the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization providing contradictory recommendations for and against use. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of remdesivir for hospi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35598856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.018 |
_version_ | 1784710271411945472 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Todd C. Murthy, Srinivas Del Corpo, Olivier Senécal, Julien Butler-Laporte, Guillaume Sohani, Zahra N. Brophy, James M. McDonald, Emily G. |
author_facet | Lee, Todd C. Murthy, Srinivas Del Corpo, Olivier Senécal, Julien Butler-Laporte, Guillaume Sohani, Zahra N. Brophy, James M. McDonald, Emily G. |
author_sort | Lee, Todd C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefits of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain debated with the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization providing contradictory recommendations for and against use. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of remdesivir for hospitalized inpatients as a function of oxygen requirements. DATA SOURCES: Beginning with our prior systematic review, we searched MEDLINE using PubMed from 15 January 2021 through 5 May 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials; all languages. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalized adults with COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: Remdesivir, in comparison to either placebo, or standard of care. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: We used the ROB-2 criteria. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was mortality, stratified by oxygen use (none, supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation, and mechanical ventilation). We conducted a frequentist random effects meta-analysis on the risk ratio scale and, to contextualize the probabilistic benefits, we also performed a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on the risk difference scale. A ≥1% absolute risk reduction was considered clinically important. RESULTS: We identified eight randomized trials, totaling 10 751 participants. The risk ratio for mortality comparing remdesivir vs. control was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.5–1.19) in the patients who did not require supplemental oxygen; 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99) for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen; and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.88–1.31) in the setting of mechanical ventilation. Using neutral priors, the probabilities that remdesivir reduces mortality were 76.8%, 93.8%, and 14.7%, respectively. The probability that remdesivir reduced mortality by ≥ 1% was 77.4% for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis, there is a high probability that remdesivir reduces mortality for nonventilated patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen therapy. Treatment guidelines should be re-evaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9117160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91171602022-05-19 Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Todd C. Murthy, Srinivas Del Corpo, Olivier Senécal, Julien Butler-Laporte, Guillaume Sohani, Zahra N. Brophy, James M. McDonald, Emily G. Clin Microbiol Infect Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The benefits of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain debated with the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization providing contradictory recommendations for and against use. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of remdesivir for hospitalized inpatients as a function of oxygen requirements. DATA SOURCES: Beginning with our prior systematic review, we searched MEDLINE using PubMed from 15 January 2021 through 5 May 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials; all languages. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalized adults with COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: Remdesivir, in comparison to either placebo, or standard of care. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: We used the ROB-2 criteria. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was mortality, stratified by oxygen use (none, supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation, and mechanical ventilation). We conducted a frequentist random effects meta-analysis on the risk ratio scale and, to contextualize the probabilistic benefits, we also performed a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on the risk difference scale. A ≥1% absolute risk reduction was considered clinically important. RESULTS: We identified eight randomized trials, totaling 10 751 participants. The risk ratio for mortality comparing remdesivir vs. control was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.5–1.19) in the patients who did not require supplemental oxygen; 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99) for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen; and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.88–1.31) in the setting of mechanical ventilation. Using neutral priors, the probabilities that remdesivir reduces mortality were 76.8%, 93.8%, and 14.7%, respectively. The probability that remdesivir reduced mortality by ≥ 1% was 77.4% for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis, there is a high probability that remdesivir reduces mortality for nonventilated patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen therapy. Treatment guidelines should be re-evaluated. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-09 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9117160/ /pubmed/35598856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.018 Text en © 2022 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Lee, Todd C. Murthy, Srinivas Del Corpo, Olivier Senécal, Julien Butler-Laporte, Guillaume Sohani, Zahra N. Brophy, James M. McDonald, Emily G. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | remdesivir for the treatment of covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35598856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leetoddc remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murthysrinivas remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT delcorpoolivier remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT senecaljulien remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT butlerlaporteguillaume remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sohanizahran remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brophyjamesm remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mcdonaldemilyg remdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |