Cargando…

Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()

INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and del...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palacio Rua, Katherine, García Correa, Juan Felipe, Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar, Afanador Ayala, Carlos, Rugeles, María Teresa, Zuluaga, Andrés F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2022.05.005
_version_ 1784710295079354368
author Palacio Rua, Katherine
García Correa, Juan Felipe
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Afanador Ayala, Carlos
Rugeles, María Teresa
Zuluaga, Andrés F.
author_facet Palacio Rua, Katherine
García Correa, Juan Felipe
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Afanador Ayala, Carlos
Rugeles, María Teresa
Zuluaga, Andrés F.
author_sort Palacio Rua, Katherine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and ribonuclease P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and Rnasa P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values ​​(Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (P = .84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9117263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91172632022-05-19 Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2() Palacio Rua, Katherine García Correa, Juan Felipe Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Afanador Ayala, Carlos Rugeles, María Teresa Zuluaga, Andrés F. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) Original Article INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and ribonuclease P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and Rnasa P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values ​​(Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (P = .84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples. The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2022-10 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9117263/ /pubmed/35643923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2022.05.005 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Palacio Rua, Katherine
García Correa, Juan Felipe
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Afanador Ayala, Carlos
Rugeles, María Teresa
Zuluaga, Andrés F.
Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()
title Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()
title_full Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()
title_fullStr Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()
title_short Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2()
title_sort validation of a duplex pcr technique using the gen e and rnase p for the diagnosis of sars-cov-2()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2022.05.005
work_keys_str_mv AT palacioruakatherine validationofaduplexpcrtechniqueusingthegeneandrnasepforthediagnosisofsarscov2
AT garciacorreajuanfelipe validationofaduplexpcrtechniqueusingthegeneandrnasepforthediagnosisofsarscov2
AT aguilarjimenezwbeimar validationofaduplexpcrtechniqueusingthegeneandrnasepforthediagnosisofsarscov2
AT afanadorayalacarlos validationofaduplexpcrtechniqueusingthegeneandrnasepforthediagnosisofsarscov2
AT rugelesmariateresa validationofaduplexpcrtechniqueusingthegeneandrnasepforthediagnosisofsarscov2
AT zuluagaandresf validationofaduplexpcrtechniqueusingthegeneandrnasepforthediagnosisofsarscov2