Cargando…

A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients

This study examines the validity of measuring faecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample as a diagnostic tool for bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) by direct comparison to the (75)selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan. A prospective observational study was undertaken. Patients with chronic diarr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Aditi, Al-Hassi, Hafid O., Jain, Manushri, Phipps, Oliver, Ford, Clare, Gama, Rousseau, Steed, Helen, Butterworth, Jeffrey, McLaughlin, John, Galbraith, Niall, Brookes, Matthew J., Hughes, Lauren E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12003-z
_version_ 1784710304430555136
author Kumar, Aditi
Al-Hassi, Hafid O.
Jain, Manushri
Phipps, Oliver
Ford, Clare
Gama, Rousseau
Steed, Helen
Butterworth, Jeffrey
McLaughlin, John
Galbraith, Niall
Brookes, Matthew J.
Hughes, Lauren E.
author_facet Kumar, Aditi
Al-Hassi, Hafid O.
Jain, Manushri
Phipps, Oliver
Ford, Clare
Gama, Rousseau
Steed, Helen
Butterworth, Jeffrey
McLaughlin, John
Galbraith, Niall
Brookes, Matthew J.
Hughes, Lauren E.
author_sort Kumar, Aditi
collection PubMed
description This study examines the validity of measuring faecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample as a diagnostic tool for bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) by direct comparison to the (75)selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan. A prospective observational study was undertaken. Patients with chronic diarrhoea (> 6 weeks) being investigated for potential BAD with SeHCAT scan provided stool samples for measurement of FBA, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were characterised into four groups: SeHCAT negative control group, post-cholecystectomy, idiopathic BAD and post-operative terminal ileal resected Crohn’s disease. Stool samples were collected at baseline and 8-weeks post treatment to determine whether FBA measurement could be used to monitor therapeutic response. 113 patients had a stool sample to directly compare with their SeHCAT result. FBA concentrations (μmol/g) and interquartile ranges in patients in the control group (2.8; 1.6–4.2), BAD (3.6; 1.9–7.2) and post-cholecystectomy cohort 3.8 (2.3–6.8) were similar, but all were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the Crohn’s disease cohort (11.8; 10.1–16.2). FBA concentrations in patients with SeHCAT retention of < 15% (4.95; 2.6–10.5) and < 5% (9.9; 4.8–15.4) were significantly higher than those with a SeHCAT retention > 15% (2.6; 1.6–4.2); (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity using FBA cut-off of 1.6 μmol/g (using ≤ 15% SeHCAT retention as diagnostic of BAD) were 90% and 25% respectively. A single random stool sample may have potential use in diagnosing severe BAD or BAD in Crohn’s patients. Larger studies are now needed to confirm the potential efficacy of this test to accurately diagnose BAD in the absence of SeHCAT testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9117305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91173052022-05-20 A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients Kumar, Aditi Al-Hassi, Hafid O. Jain, Manushri Phipps, Oliver Ford, Clare Gama, Rousseau Steed, Helen Butterworth, Jeffrey McLaughlin, John Galbraith, Niall Brookes, Matthew J. Hughes, Lauren E. Sci Rep Article This study examines the validity of measuring faecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample as a diagnostic tool for bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) by direct comparison to the (75)selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan. A prospective observational study was undertaken. Patients with chronic diarrhoea (> 6 weeks) being investigated for potential BAD with SeHCAT scan provided stool samples for measurement of FBA, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were characterised into four groups: SeHCAT negative control group, post-cholecystectomy, idiopathic BAD and post-operative terminal ileal resected Crohn’s disease. Stool samples were collected at baseline and 8-weeks post treatment to determine whether FBA measurement could be used to monitor therapeutic response. 113 patients had a stool sample to directly compare with their SeHCAT result. FBA concentrations (μmol/g) and interquartile ranges in patients in the control group (2.8; 1.6–4.2), BAD (3.6; 1.9–7.2) and post-cholecystectomy cohort 3.8 (2.3–6.8) were similar, but all were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the Crohn’s disease cohort (11.8; 10.1–16.2). FBA concentrations in patients with SeHCAT retention of < 15% (4.95; 2.6–10.5) and < 5% (9.9; 4.8–15.4) were significantly higher than those with a SeHCAT retention > 15% (2.6; 1.6–4.2); (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity using FBA cut-off of 1.6 μmol/g (using ≤ 15% SeHCAT retention as diagnostic of BAD) were 90% and 25% respectively. A single random stool sample may have potential use in diagnosing severe BAD or BAD in Crohn’s patients. Larger studies are now needed to confirm the potential efficacy of this test to accurately diagnose BAD in the absence of SeHCAT testing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9117305/ /pubmed/35585139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12003-z Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kumar, Aditi
Al-Hassi, Hafid O.
Jain, Manushri
Phipps, Oliver
Ford, Clare
Gama, Rousseau
Steed, Helen
Butterworth, Jeffrey
McLaughlin, John
Galbraith, Niall
Brookes, Matthew J.
Hughes, Lauren E.
A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
title A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
title_full A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
title_fullStr A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
title_full_unstemmed A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
title_short A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
title_sort single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing sehcat testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12003-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaraditi asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT alhassihafido asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT jainmanushri asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT phippsoliver asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT fordclare asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT gamarousseau asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT steedhelen asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT butterworthjeffrey asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT mclaughlinjohn asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT galbraithniall asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT brookesmatthewj asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT hugheslaurene asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT kumaraditi singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT alhassihafido singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT jainmanushri singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT phippsoliver singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT fordclare singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT gamarousseau singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT steedhelen singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT butterworthjeffrey singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT mclaughlinjohn singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT galbraithniall singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT brookesmatthewj singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients
AT hugheslaurene singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients