Cargando…
A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients
This study examines the validity of measuring faecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample as a diagnostic tool for bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) by direct comparison to the (75)selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan. A prospective observational study was undertaken. Patients with chronic diarr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12003-z |
_version_ | 1784710304430555136 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Aditi Al-Hassi, Hafid O. Jain, Manushri Phipps, Oliver Ford, Clare Gama, Rousseau Steed, Helen Butterworth, Jeffrey McLaughlin, John Galbraith, Niall Brookes, Matthew J. Hughes, Lauren E. |
author_facet | Kumar, Aditi Al-Hassi, Hafid O. Jain, Manushri Phipps, Oliver Ford, Clare Gama, Rousseau Steed, Helen Butterworth, Jeffrey McLaughlin, John Galbraith, Niall Brookes, Matthew J. Hughes, Lauren E. |
author_sort | Kumar, Aditi |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examines the validity of measuring faecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample as a diagnostic tool for bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) by direct comparison to the (75)selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan. A prospective observational study was undertaken. Patients with chronic diarrhoea (> 6 weeks) being investigated for potential BAD with SeHCAT scan provided stool samples for measurement of FBA, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were characterised into four groups: SeHCAT negative control group, post-cholecystectomy, idiopathic BAD and post-operative terminal ileal resected Crohn’s disease. Stool samples were collected at baseline and 8-weeks post treatment to determine whether FBA measurement could be used to monitor therapeutic response. 113 patients had a stool sample to directly compare with their SeHCAT result. FBA concentrations (μmol/g) and interquartile ranges in patients in the control group (2.8; 1.6–4.2), BAD (3.6; 1.9–7.2) and post-cholecystectomy cohort 3.8 (2.3–6.8) were similar, but all were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the Crohn’s disease cohort (11.8; 10.1–16.2). FBA concentrations in patients with SeHCAT retention of < 15% (4.95; 2.6–10.5) and < 5% (9.9; 4.8–15.4) were significantly higher than those with a SeHCAT retention > 15% (2.6; 1.6–4.2); (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity using FBA cut-off of 1.6 μmol/g (using ≤ 15% SeHCAT retention as diagnostic of BAD) were 90% and 25% respectively. A single random stool sample may have potential use in diagnosing severe BAD or BAD in Crohn’s patients. Larger studies are now needed to confirm the potential efficacy of this test to accurately diagnose BAD in the absence of SeHCAT testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9117305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91173052022-05-20 A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients Kumar, Aditi Al-Hassi, Hafid O. Jain, Manushri Phipps, Oliver Ford, Clare Gama, Rousseau Steed, Helen Butterworth, Jeffrey McLaughlin, John Galbraith, Niall Brookes, Matthew J. Hughes, Lauren E. Sci Rep Article This study examines the validity of measuring faecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample as a diagnostic tool for bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) by direct comparison to the (75)selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scan. A prospective observational study was undertaken. Patients with chronic diarrhoea (> 6 weeks) being investigated for potential BAD with SeHCAT scan provided stool samples for measurement of FBA, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were characterised into four groups: SeHCAT negative control group, post-cholecystectomy, idiopathic BAD and post-operative terminal ileal resected Crohn’s disease. Stool samples were collected at baseline and 8-weeks post treatment to determine whether FBA measurement could be used to monitor therapeutic response. 113 patients had a stool sample to directly compare with their SeHCAT result. FBA concentrations (μmol/g) and interquartile ranges in patients in the control group (2.8; 1.6–4.2), BAD (3.6; 1.9–7.2) and post-cholecystectomy cohort 3.8 (2.3–6.8) were similar, but all were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the Crohn’s disease cohort (11.8; 10.1–16.2). FBA concentrations in patients with SeHCAT retention of < 15% (4.95; 2.6–10.5) and < 5% (9.9; 4.8–15.4) were significantly higher than those with a SeHCAT retention > 15% (2.6; 1.6–4.2); (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity using FBA cut-off of 1.6 μmol/g (using ≤ 15% SeHCAT retention as diagnostic of BAD) were 90% and 25% respectively. A single random stool sample may have potential use in diagnosing severe BAD or BAD in Crohn’s patients. Larger studies are now needed to confirm the potential efficacy of this test to accurately diagnose BAD in the absence of SeHCAT testing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9117305/ /pubmed/35585139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12003-z Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kumar, Aditi Al-Hassi, Hafid O. Jain, Manushri Phipps, Oliver Ford, Clare Gama, Rousseau Steed, Helen Butterworth, Jeffrey McLaughlin, John Galbraith, Niall Brookes, Matthew J. Hughes, Lauren E. A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
title | A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
title_full | A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
title_fullStr | A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
title_short | A single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing SeHCAT testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
title_sort | single faecal bile acid stool test demonstrates potential efficacy in replacing sehcat testing for bile acid diarrhoea in selected patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12003-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumaraditi asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT alhassihafido asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT jainmanushri asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT phippsoliver asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT fordclare asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT gamarousseau asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT steedhelen asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT butterworthjeffrey asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT mclaughlinjohn asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT galbraithniall asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT brookesmatthewj asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT hugheslaurene asinglefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT kumaraditi singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT alhassihafido singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT jainmanushri singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT phippsoliver singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT fordclare singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT gamarousseau singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT steedhelen singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT butterworthjeffrey singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT mclaughlinjohn singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT galbraithniall singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT brookesmatthewj singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients AT hugheslaurene singlefaecalbileacidstooltestdemonstratespotentialefficacyinreplacingsehcattestingforbileaciddiarrhoeainselectedpatients |