Cargando…
Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators
BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is a very demanding process. For decades, external fixation was the only reliable option for gradual deformity correction. Recently, intramedullary magnetic nails have gained popularity. This research aimed to assess the quality of life in children during gradual...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05399-w |
_version_ | 1784710322014126080 |
---|---|
author | Hafez, Mohamed Nicolaou, Nicolas Offiah, Amaka Offorha, Bright Giles, Stephen Madan, Sanjeev Fernandes, James A. |
author_facet | Hafez, Mohamed Nicolaou, Nicolas Offiah, Amaka Offorha, Bright Giles, Stephen Madan, Sanjeev Fernandes, James A. |
author_sort | Hafez, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is a very demanding process. For decades, external fixation was the only reliable option for gradual deformity correction. Recently, intramedullary magnetic nails have gained popularity. This research aimed to assess the quality of life in children during gradual deformity correction using intramedullary lengthening nails compared to external fixation. METHOD: Prospective analysis included children who had gradual lower limb deformity correction between 2017 and 2019. Group A included children who had magnetic lengthening nails; patients in group B had external fixation devices. Child health utility 9D (CHU- 9D) and EuroQol 5D youth (EQ- 5D-Y) were used to measure the quality of life at fixed points during the distraction osteogenesis process. The results were used to calculate the utility at each milestone and the overall quality of life adjusted years (QALYs). RESULTS: Thirty-four children were recruited, group A had 16 patients, whilst group B had 18 patients. The average ages were 16.0 years and 14.7 years for groups A and B, respectively. Group A patients reported significantly better utility compared to group B. This was observed during all stages of treatment (P = 0.00016). QALYs were better for group A (0.44) compared to group B (0.34) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The quality of life was generally better in group A compared to group B. In most patients, the health utility progressively improved throughout treatment. In the same way, QALYs were better with the lengthening nails compared to external fixators. The magnetic lengthening devices (PRECICE nails) which were used in this research were recently relabelled to restrict their applications in children; this study was conducted before these restrictions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9117380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91173802022-05-20 Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators Hafez, Mohamed Nicolaou, Nicolas Offiah, Amaka Offorha, Bright Giles, Stephen Madan, Sanjeev Fernandes, James A. Int Orthop Original Paper BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is a very demanding process. For decades, external fixation was the only reliable option for gradual deformity correction. Recently, intramedullary magnetic nails have gained popularity. This research aimed to assess the quality of life in children during gradual deformity correction using intramedullary lengthening nails compared to external fixation. METHOD: Prospective analysis included children who had gradual lower limb deformity correction between 2017 and 2019. Group A included children who had magnetic lengthening nails; patients in group B had external fixation devices. Child health utility 9D (CHU- 9D) and EuroQol 5D youth (EQ- 5D-Y) were used to measure the quality of life at fixed points during the distraction osteogenesis process. The results were used to calculate the utility at each milestone and the overall quality of life adjusted years (QALYs). RESULTS: Thirty-four children were recruited, group A had 16 patients, whilst group B had 18 patients. The average ages were 16.0 years and 14.7 years for groups A and B, respectively. Group A patients reported significantly better utility compared to group B. This was observed during all stages of treatment (P = 0.00016). QALYs were better for group A (0.44) compared to group B (0.34) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The quality of life was generally better in group A compared to group B. In most patients, the health utility progressively improved throughout treatment. In the same way, QALYs were better with the lengthening nails compared to external fixators. The magnetic lengthening devices (PRECICE nails) which were used in this research were recently relabelled to restrict their applications in children; this study was conducted before these restrictions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-07 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9117380/ /pubmed/35385976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05399-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hafez, Mohamed Nicolaou, Nicolas Offiah, Amaka Offorha, Bright Giles, Stephen Madan, Sanjeev Fernandes, James A. Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
title | Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
title_full | Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
title_fullStr | Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
title_short | Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
title_sort | quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05399-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hafezmohamed qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators AT nicolaounicolas qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators AT offiahamaka qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators AT offorhabright qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators AT gilesstephen qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators AT madansanjeev qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators AT fernandesjamesa qualityoflifeofchildrenduringdistractionosteogenesisacomparisonbetweenintramedullarymagneticlengtheningnailsandexternalfixators |