Cargando…
Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective
BACKGROUND: Use of digital health services, such as digital patient-reported outcomes, depends on many different human factors as well as digital design solutions. One factor is clinicians’ attitude towards the system, their reasoning behind the using system and their perceptions of patients’ abilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35587297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00462-x |
_version_ | 1784710340857036800 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Amalie Søgaard Appel, Charlotte W. Larsen, Birgit Furstrand Hanna, Lisa Kayser, Lars |
author_facet | Nielsen, Amalie Søgaard Appel, Charlotte W. Larsen, Birgit Furstrand Hanna, Lisa Kayser, Lars |
author_sort | Nielsen, Amalie Søgaard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Use of digital health services, such as digital patient-reported outcomes, depends on many different human factors as well as digital design solutions. One factor is clinicians’ attitude towards the system, their reasoning behind the using system and their perceptions of patients’ ability to engage with digital health systems. This study aimed to explore hospital clinicians’ attitudes towards digital patient-reported outcomes used in the routine care and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, and to explore the potential role of clinicians’ attitudes in influencing patients’ use of digital patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve clinicians using digital patient-reported outcome assessments in the care of inflammatory bowel disease were interviewed about their experiences of, and perspectives on, using this service. Most participants supported the use of digital patient-reported outcome assessments in the care of most patients. Participants reported that most patients found the digital solution easy to use. They perceived digital patient-reported outcomes to have three main purposes: prioritising resources; improving patients’ quality of life; and improving quality of care. The patient-clinician relationship was of great importance to participants. Participants varied in their intention to use digital PRO, as some viewed the system as a positive but optional add-on for patients, whilst others intended to use the system with all eligible patients. CONCLUSION: Clinicians’ general support of using digital patient-reported outcomes might facilitate their use among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The participants saw benefits in doing so for patients, clinicians and the wider health service. Clinicians’ attitudes towards the use of digital PRO in the care of their patients may influence patients’ uptake of health service. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00462-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9117590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91175902022-05-19 Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective Nielsen, Amalie Søgaard Appel, Charlotte W. Larsen, Birgit Furstrand Hanna, Lisa Kayser, Lars J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Use of digital health services, such as digital patient-reported outcomes, depends on many different human factors as well as digital design solutions. One factor is clinicians’ attitude towards the system, their reasoning behind the using system and their perceptions of patients’ ability to engage with digital health systems. This study aimed to explore hospital clinicians’ attitudes towards digital patient-reported outcomes used in the routine care and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, and to explore the potential role of clinicians’ attitudes in influencing patients’ use of digital patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve clinicians using digital patient-reported outcome assessments in the care of inflammatory bowel disease were interviewed about their experiences of, and perspectives on, using this service. Most participants supported the use of digital patient-reported outcome assessments in the care of most patients. Participants reported that most patients found the digital solution easy to use. They perceived digital patient-reported outcomes to have three main purposes: prioritising resources; improving patients’ quality of life; and improving quality of care. The patient-clinician relationship was of great importance to participants. Participants varied in their intention to use digital PRO, as some viewed the system as a positive but optional add-on for patients, whilst others intended to use the system with all eligible patients. CONCLUSION: Clinicians’ general support of using digital patient-reported outcomes might facilitate their use among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The participants saw benefits in doing so for patients, clinicians and the wider health service. Clinicians’ attitudes towards the use of digital PRO in the care of their patients may influence patients’ uptake of health service. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00462-x. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9117590/ /pubmed/35587297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00462-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Nielsen, Amalie Søgaard Appel, Charlotte W. Larsen, Birgit Furstrand Hanna, Lisa Kayser, Lars Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
title | Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
title_full | Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
title_fullStr | Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
title_short | Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
title_sort | digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35587297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00462-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsenamaliesøgaard digitalpatientreportedoutcomesininflammatoryboweldiseaseroutineclinicalpracticetheclinicianperspective AT appelcharlottew digitalpatientreportedoutcomesininflammatoryboweldiseaseroutineclinicalpracticetheclinicianperspective AT larsenbirgitfurstrand digitalpatientreportedoutcomesininflammatoryboweldiseaseroutineclinicalpracticetheclinicianperspective AT hannalisa digitalpatientreportedoutcomesininflammatoryboweldiseaseroutineclinicalpracticetheclinicianperspective AT kayserlars digitalpatientreportedoutcomesininflammatoryboweldiseaseroutineclinicalpracticetheclinicianperspective |