Cargando…

Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling

Many cardiac pathologies are associated with reduced gap junction (GJ) coupling, an important modulator of cardiac conduction velocity (CV). However, the relationship between phenotype and functional expression of the connexin GJ family of proteins is controversial. For example, a 50% reduction of G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Joyce, Abraham, Anand, George, Sharon A., Greer-Short, Amara, Blair, Grace A., Moreno, Angel, Alber, Bridget R., Kay, Matthew W., Poelzing, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35600295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.848019
_version_ 1784710351635349504
author Lin, Joyce
Abraham, Anand
George, Sharon A.
Greer-Short, Amara
Blair, Grace A.
Moreno, Angel
Alber, Bridget R.
Kay, Matthew W.
Poelzing, Steven
author_facet Lin, Joyce
Abraham, Anand
George, Sharon A.
Greer-Short, Amara
Blair, Grace A.
Moreno, Angel
Alber, Bridget R.
Kay, Matthew W.
Poelzing, Steven
author_sort Lin, Joyce
collection PubMed
description Many cardiac pathologies are associated with reduced gap junction (GJ) coupling, an important modulator of cardiac conduction velocity (CV). However, the relationship between phenotype and functional expression of the connexin GJ family of proteins is controversial. For example, a 50% reduction of GJ coupling has been shown to have little impact on myocardial CV due to a concept known as conduction reserve. This can be explained by the ephaptic coupling (EpC) theory whereby conduction is maintained by a combination of low GJ coupling and increased electrical fields generated in the sodium channel rich clefts between neighboring myocytes. At the same time, low GJ coupling may also increase intracellular charge accumulation within myocytes, resulting in a faster transmembrane potential rate of change during depolarization (dV/dt_max) that maintains macroscopic conduction. To provide insight into the prevalence of these two phenomena during pathological conditions, we investigated the relationship between EpC and charge accumulation within the setting of GJ remodeling using multicellular simulations and companion perfused mouse heart experiments. Conduction along a fiber of myocardial cells was simulated for a range of GJ conditions. The model incorporated intercellular variations, including GJ coupling conductance and distribution, cell-to-cell separation in the intercalated disc (perinexal width—W(P)), and variations in sodium channel distribution. Perfused heart studies having conditions analogous to those of the simulations were performed using wild type mice and mice heterozygous null for the connexin gene Gja1. With insight from simulations, the relative contributions of EpC and charge accumulation on action potential parameters and conduction velocities were analyzed. Both simulation and experimental results support a common conclusion that low GJ coupling decreases and narrowing W(P) increases the rate of the AP upstroke when sodium channels are densely expressed at the ends of myocytes, indicating that conduction reserve is more dependent on EpC than charge accumulation during GJ uncoupling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9117633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91176332022-05-20 Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling Lin, Joyce Abraham, Anand George, Sharon A. Greer-Short, Amara Blair, Grace A. Moreno, Angel Alber, Bridget R. Kay, Matthew W. Poelzing, Steven Front Physiol Physiology Many cardiac pathologies are associated with reduced gap junction (GJ) coupling, an important modulator of cardiac conduction velocity (CV). However, the relationship between phenotype and functional expression of the connexin GJ family of proteins is controversial. For example, a 50% reduction of GJ coupling has been shown to have little impact on myocardial CV due to a concept known as conduction reserve. This can be explained by the ephaptic coupling (EpC) theory whereby conduction is maintained by a combination of low GJ coupling and increased electrical fields generated in the sodium channel rich clefts between neighboring myocytes. At the same time, low GJ coupling may also increase intracellular charge accumulation within myocytes, resulting in a faster transmembrane potential rate of change during depolarization (dV/dt_max) that maintains macroscopic conduction. To provide insight into the prevalence of these two phenomena during pathological conditions, we investigated the relationship between EpC and charge accumulation within the setting of GJ remodeling using multicellular simulations and companion perfused mouse heart experiments. Conduction along a fiber of myocardial cells was simulated for a range of GJ conditions. The model incorporated intercellular variations, including GJ coupling conductance and distribution, cell-to-cell separation in the intercalated disc (perinexal width—W(P)), and variations in sodium channel distribution. Perfused heart studies having conditions analogous to those of the simulations were performed using wild type mice and mice heterozygous null for the connexin gene Gja1. With insight from simulations, the relative contributions of EpC and charge accumulation on action potential parameters and conduction velocities were analyzed. Both simulation and experimental results support a common conclusion that low GJ coupling decreases and narrowing W(P) increases the rate of the AP upstroke when sodium channels are densely expressed at the ends of myocytes, indicating that conduction reserve is more dependent on EpC than charge accumulation during GJ uncoupling. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9117633/ /pubmed/35600295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.848019 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Abraham, George, Greer-Short, Blair, Moreno, Alber, Kay and Poelzing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Lin, Joyce
Abraham, Anand
George, Sharon A.
Greer-Short, Amara
Blair, Grace A.
Moreno, Angel
Alber, Bridget R.
Kay, Matthew W.
Poelzing, Steven
Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling
title Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling
title_full Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling
title_fullStr Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling
title_full_unstemmed Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling
title_short Ephaptic Coupling Is a Mechanism of Conduction Reserve During Reduced Gap Junction Coupling
title_sort ephaptic coupling is a mechanism of conduction reserve during reduced gap junction coupling
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9117633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35600295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.848019
work_keys_str_mv AT linjoyce ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT abrahamanand ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT georgesharona ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT greershortamara ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT blairgracea ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT morenoangel ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT alberbridgetr ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT kaymattheww ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling
AT poelzingsteven ephapticcouplingisamechanismofconductionreserveduringreducedgapjunctioncoupling