Cargando…

Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw instrumentation of the cervical spine, although technically challenging due to the potential risk of serious neurovascular injuries, is biomechanically favorable for stabilization purposes. Patient-specific templates are increasingly used in the thoracolumbar spine with exc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farshad, Mazda, Spirig, José Miguel, Winkler, Elin, Suter, Daniel, Farshad-Amacker, Nadja, Jarvers, Jan-Sven, Tschöke, Sven Kevin, Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard, Calek, Anna-Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100120
_version_ 1784710457394724864
author Farshad, Mazda
Spirig, José Miguel
Winkler, Elin
Suter, Daniel
Farshad-Amacker, Nadja
Jarvers, Jan-Sven
Tschöke, Sven Kevin
Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard
Calek, Anna-Katharina
author_facet Farshad, Mazda
Spirig, José Miguel
Winkler, Elin
Suter, Daniel
Farshad-Amacker, Nadja
Jarvers, Jan-Sven
Tschöke, Sven Kevin
Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard
Calek, Anna-Katharina
author_sort Farshad, Mazda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw instrumentation of the cervical spine, although technically challenging due to the potential risk of serious neurovascular injuries, is biomechanically favorable for stabilization purposes. Patient-specific templates are increasingly used in the thoracolumbar spine with excellent accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement with patient-specific templates in a clinical setting and to report the European experience so far. METHODS: Multicentric, retrospectively obtained data of twelve patients who underwent dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine with 3D-printed patient-specific templates were analyzed. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to evaluate pedicle perforation and screw deviations between the planned and actual screw position. Furthermore, surgical time, radiation exposure, blood loss and immediate postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 86 screws were inserted, of which 82 (95.3%) were fully contained inside the pedicle. All perforations (four screws, 4.7%) were within the safe zone of 2 mm and did not result in any neurovascular complications. Overall, median deviation from planned entry point (Euclidean distance) was 1.2 mm (0.1 - 11 mm), median deviation from the planned trajectory (Euler angle) was 4.4° (0.2-71.5°), median axial and sagittal trajectory deviation from the planned trajectory were 2.5° (0 - 57.5°) and 3.3° (0 - 54.9°), respectively. Median operative time was 168 minutes (111 - 564 minutes), median blood loss was 300 ml (150 - 1300 ml) and median intraoperative fluoroscopic dose was 321.2 mGycm(2) (102.4 - 825.0 mGycm(2)). Overall complications were one adjacent segment kyphosis, one transient C5 palsy and one wound healing disorder. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific 3D-printed templates provide a highly accurate option for placing cervical pedicle screws for dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9118173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91181732022-05-20 Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation() Farshad, Mazda Spirig, José Miguel Winkler, Elin Suter, Daniel Farshad-Amacker, Nadja Jarvers, Jan-Sven Tschöke, Sven Kevin Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard Calek, Anna-Katharina N Am Spine Soc J Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw instrumentation of the cervical spine, although technically challenging due to the potential risk of serious neurovascular injuries, is biomechanically favorable for stabilization purposes. Patient-specific templates are increasingly used in the thoracolumbar spine with excellent accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement with patient-specific templates in a clinical setting and to report the European experience so far. METHODS: Multicentric, retrospectively obtained data of twelve patients who underwent dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine with 3D-printed patient-specific templates were analyzed. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to evaluate pedicle perforation and screw deviations between the planned and actual screw position. Furthermore, surgical time, radiation exposure, blood loss and immediate postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 86 screws were inserted, of which 82 (95.3%) were fully contained inside the pedicle. All perforations (four screws, 4.7%) were within the safe zone of 2 mm and did not result in any neurovascular complications. Overall, median deviation from planned entry point (Euclidean distance) was 1.2 mm (0.1 - 11 mm), median deviation from the planned trajectory (Euler angle) was 4.4° (0.2-71.5°), median axial and sagittal trajectory deviation from the planned trajectory were 2.5° (0 - 57.5°) and 3.3° (0 - 54.9°), respectively. Median operative time was 168 minutes (111 - 564 minutes), median blood loss was 300 ml (150 - 1300 ml) and median intraoperative fluoroscopic dose was 321.2 mGycm(2) (102.4 - 825.0 mGycm(2)). Overall complications were one adjacent segment kyphosis, one transient C5 palsy and one wound healing disorder. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific 3D-printed templates provide a highly accurate option for placing cervical pedicle screws for dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine. Elsevier 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9118173/ /pubmed/35602175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100120 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of North American Spine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Farshad, Mazda
Spirig, José Miguel
Winkler, Elin
Suter, Daniel
Farshad-Amacker, Nadja
Jarvers, Jan-Sven
Tschöke, Sven Kevin
Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard
Calek, Anna-Katharina
Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
title Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
title_full Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
title_fullStr Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
title_full_unstemmed Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
title_short Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
title_sort template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation()
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100120
work_keys_str_mv AT farshadmazda templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT spirigjosemiguel templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT winklerelin templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT suterdaniel templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT farshadamackernadja templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT jarversjansven templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT tschokesvenkevin templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT heydechristopheckhard templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation
AT calekannakatharina templateguidedcervicalpediclescrewinstrumentation