Cargando…
Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries
Information security and data breaches are perhaps the biggest challenges that global businesses face in the digital economy. Although data breaches can cause significant harm to users, businesses, and society, there is significant individual and national variation in people’s responses to data brea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00519-5 |
_version_ | 1784710458821836800 |
---|---|
author | Madan, Shilpa Savani, Krishna Katsikeas, Constantine S. |
author_facet | Madan, Shilpa Savani, Krishna Katsikeas, Constantine S. |
author_sort | Madan, Shilpa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Information security and data breaches are perhaps the biggest challenges that global businesses face in the digital economy. Although data breaches can cause significant harm to users, businesses, and society, there is significant individual and national variation in people’s responses to data breaches across markets. This research investigates power distance as an antecedent of people’s divergent reactions to data breaches. Eight studies using archival, correlational, and experimental methods find that high power distance makes users more willing to continue patronizing a business after a data breach (Studies 1–3). This is because they are more likely to believe that the business, not they themselves, owns the compromised data (Studies 4–5A) and, hence, do not reduce their transactions with the business. Making people believe that they (not the business) own the shared data attenuates this effect (Study 5B). Study 6 provides additional evidence for the underlying mechanism. Finally, Study 7 shows that high uncertainty avoidance acts as a moderator that mitigates the effect of power distance on willingness to continue patronizing a business after a data breach. Theoretical contributions to the international business literature and practitioner and policy insights are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41267-022-00519-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9118180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91181802022-05-19 Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries Madan, Shilpa Savani, Krishna Katsikeas, Constantine S. J Int Bus Stud Article Information security and data breaches are perhaps the biggest challenges that global businesses face in the digital economy. Although data breaches can cause significant harm to users, businesses, and society, there is significant individual and national variation in people’s responses to data breaches across markets. This research investigates power distance as an antecedent of people’s divergent reactions to data breaches. Eight studies using archival, correlational, and experimental methods find that high power distance makes users more willing to continue patronizing a business after a data breach (Studies 1–3). This is because they are more likely to believe that the business, not they themselves, owns the compromised data (Studies 4–5A) and, hence, do not reduce their transactions with the business. Making people believe that they (not the business) own the shared data attenuates this effect (Study 5B). Study 6 provides additional evidence for the underlying mechanism. Finally, Study 7 shows that high uncertainty avoidance acts as a moderator that mitigates the effect of power distance on willingness to continue patronizing a business after a data breach. Theoretical contributions to the international business literature and practitioner and policy insights are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41267-022-00519-5. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022-05-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9118180/ /pubmed/35607320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00519-5 Text en © Academy of International Business 2022, corrected publication 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Madan, Shilpa Savani, Krishna Katsikeas, Constantine S. Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
title | Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
title_full | Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
title_fullStr | Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
title_short | Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
title_sort | privacy please: power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00519-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madanshilpa privacypleasepowerdistanceandpeoplesresponsestodatabreachesacrosscountries AT savanikrishna privacypleasepowerdistanceandpeoplesresponsestodatabreachesacrosscountries AT katsikeasconstantines privacypleasepowerdistanceandpeoplesresponsestodatabreachesacrosscountries |