Cargando…
Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors
BACKGROUND: For brain tumors, identifying the molecular subtypes from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is desirable, but remains a challenging task. Recent machine learning and deep learning (DL) approaches may help the classification/prediction of tumor subtypes through MRIs. However, most of these...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-022-00061-3 |
_version_ | 1784710568620326912 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Muhaddisa Barat Gu, Irene Yu-Hua Lidemar, Alice Berger, Mitchel S. Widhalm, Georg Jakola, Asgeir Store |
author_facet | Ali, Muhaddisa Barat Gu, Irene Yu-Hua Lidemar, Alice Berger, Mitchel S. Widhalm, Georg Jakola, Asgeir Store |
author_sort | Ali, Muhaddisa Barat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For brain tumors, identifying the molecular subtypes from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is desirable, but remains a challenging task. Recent machine learning and deep learning (DL) approaches may help the classification/prediction of tumor subtypes through MRIs. However, most of these methods require annotated data with ground truth (GT) tumor areas manually drawn by medical experts. The manual annotation is a time consuming process with high demand on medical personnel. As an alternative automatic segmentation is often used. However, it does not guarantee the quality and could lead to improper or failed segmented boundaries due to differences in MRI acquisition parameters across imaging centers, as segmentation is an ill-defined problem. Analogous to visual object tracking and classification, this paper shifts the paradigm by training a classifier using tumor bounding box areas in MR images. The aim of our study is to see whether it is possible to replace GT tumor areas by tumor bounding box areas (e.g. ellipse shaped boxes) for classification without a significant drop in performance. METHOD: In patients with diffuse gliomas, training a deep learning classifier for subtype prediction by employing tumor regions of interest (ROIs) using ellipse bounding box versus manual annotated data. Experiments were conducted on two datasets (US and TCGA) consisting of multi-modality MRI scans where the US dataset contained patients with diffuse low-grade gliomas (dLGG) exclusively. RESULTS: Prediction rates were obtained on 2 test datasets: 69.86% for 1p/19q codeletion status on US dataset and 79.50% for IDH mutation/wild-type on TCGA dataset. Comparisons with that of using annotated GT tumor data for training showed an average of 3.0% degradation (2.92% for 1p/19q codeletion status and 3.23% for IDH genotype). CONCLUSION: Using tumor ROIs, i.e., ellipse bounding box tumor areas to replace annotated GT tumor areas for training a deep learning scheme, cause only a modest decline in performance in terms of subtype prediction. With more data that can be made available, this may be a reasonable trade-off where decline in performance may be counteracted with more data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9118766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91187662022-05-20 Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors Ali, Muhaddisa Barat Gu, Irene Yu-Hua Lidemar, Alice Berger, Mitchel S. Widhalm, Georg Jakola, Asgeir Store BMC Biomed Eng Research BACKGROUND: For brain tumors, identifying the molecular subtypes from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is desirable, but remains a challenging task. Recent machine learning and deep learning (DL) approaches may help the classification/prediction of tumor subtypes through MRIs. However, most of these methods require annotated data with ground truth (GT) tumor areas manually drawn by medical experts. The manual annotation is a time consuming process with high demand on medical personnel. As an alternative automatic segmentation is often used. However, it does not guarantee the quality and could lead to improper or failed segmented boundaries due to differences in MRI acquisition parameters across imaging centers, as segmentation is an ill-defined problem. Analogous to visual object tracking and classification, this paper shifts the paradigm by training a classifier using tumor bounding box areas in MR images. The aim of our study is to see whether it is possible to replace GT tumor areas by tumor bounding box areas (e.g. ellipse shaped boxes) for classification without a significant drop in performance. METHOD: In patients with diffuse gliomas, training a deep learning classifier for subtype prediction by employing tumor regions of interest (ROIs) using ellipse bounding box versus manual annotated data. Experiments were conducted on two datasets (US and TCGA) consisting of multi-modality MRI scans where the US dataset contained patients with diffuse low-grade gliomas (dLGG) exclusively. RESULTS: Prediction rates were obtained on 2 test datasets: 69.86% for 1p/19q codeletion status on US dataset and 79.50% for IDH mutation/wild-type on TCGA dataset. Comparisons with that of using annotated GT tumor data for training showed an average of 3.0% degradation (2.92% for 1p/19q codeletion status and 3.23% for IDH genotype). CONCLUSION: Using tumor ROIs, i.e., ellipse bounding box tumor areas to replace annotated GT tumor areas for training a deep learning scheme, cause only a modest decline in performance in terms of subtype prediction. With more data that can be made available, this may be a reasonable trade-off where decline in performance may be counteracted with more data. BioMed Central 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9118766/ /pubmed/35590389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-022-00061-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ali, Muhaddisa Barat Gu, Irene Yu-Hua Lidemar, Alice Berger, Mitchel S. Widhalm, Georg Jakola, Asgeir Store Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
title | Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
title_full | Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
title_fullStr | Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
title_short | Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
title_sort | prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a dl classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-022-00061-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alimuhaddisabarat predictionofgliomasubtypescomparisonofperformanceonadlclassifierusingboundingboxareasversusannotatedtumors AT guireneyuhua predictionofgliomasubtypescomparisonofperformanceonadlclassifierusingboundingboxareasversusannotatedtumors AT lidemaralice predictionofgliomasubtypescomparisonofperformanceonadlclassifierusingboundingboxareasversusannotatedtumors AT bergermitchels predictionofgliomasubtypescomparisonofperformanceonadlclassifierusingboundingboxareasversusannotatedtumors AT widhalmgeorg predictionofgliomasubtypescomparisonofperformanceonadlclassifierusingboundingboxareasversusannotatedtumors AT jakolaasgeirstore predictionofgliomasubtypescomparisonofperformanceonadlclassifierusingboundingboxareasversusannotatedtumors |