Cargando…

Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details

McCoy’s comparative study focuses on the different styles and reasonings by which the United States and Great Britain responded and continue to respond to epidemics. While disease control in Britain focused on the environment, comparatively later efforts in the United States concentrated on quaranti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Poczka, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42520-022-00438-7
_version_ 1784710577560485888
author Poczka, Irene
author_facet Poczka, Irene
author_sort Poczka, Irene
collection PubMed
description McCoy’s comparative study focuses on the different styles and reasonings by which the United States and Great Britain responded and continue to respond to epidemics. While disease control in Britain focused on the environment, comparatively later efforts in the United States concentrated on quarantine and control of the infected. Drawing on the concept of path dependence, McCoy argues for the continuing importance of the historical factors surrounding the emergence of the first disease control structures. In doing so, he considers the centralisation of the state, a coherent theory of disease, pressures of civil society, and the idea of the population as a social body to be crucial. However, his pleasantly lucid study inevitably omits some important research areas and questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9118810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91188102022-05-20 Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details Poczka, Irene Neue Polit Lit Essay McCoy’s comparative study focuses on the different styles and reasonings by which the United States and Great Britain responded and continue to respond to epidemics. While disease control in Britain focused on the environment, comparatively later efforts in the United States concentrated on quarantine and control of the infected. Drawing on the concept of path dependence, McCoy argues for the continuing importance of the historical factors surrounding the emergence of the first disease control structures. In doing so, he considers the centralisation of the state, a coherent theory of disease, pressures of civil society, and the idea of the population as a social body to be crucial. However, his pleasantly lucid study inevitably omits some important research areas and questions. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2022-05-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9118810/ /pubmed/35611051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42520-022-00438-7 Text en © Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Förderung politischer Literatur e.V. and the Author(s) 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Essay
Poczka, Irene
Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details
title Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details
title_full Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details
title_fullStr Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details
title_full_unstemmed Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details
title_short Eindeutige Unterschiede auf Kosten vieler kleiner Details
title_sort eindeutige unterschiede auf kosten vieler kleiner details
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42520-022-00438-7
work_keys_str_mv AT poczkairene eindeutigeunterschiedeaufkostenvielerkleinerdetails