Cargando…

Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare primary esophageal motility disorder disease. It is reported that the long-term effect of fully coated anti-reflux metal stent (FCARMS) implantation is satisfactory. Operated by a skilled and experienced endoscopist, the effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Yu-fen, Jin, Peng, Tao, Yu-rong, Xie, Hui, Wang, Xin, Yu, Dongliang, Tang, Shan, Sheng, Jian-qiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02282-1
_version_ 1784710584450678784
author Tang, Yu-fen
Jin, Peng
Tao, Yu-rong
Xie, Hui
Wang, Xin
Yu, Dongliang
Tang, Shan
Sheng, Jian-qiu
author_facet Tang, Yu-fen
Jin, Peng
Tao, Yu-rong
Xie, Hui
Wang, Xin
Yu, Dongliang
Tang, Shan
Sheng, Jian-qiu
author_sort Tang, Yu-fen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare primary esophageal motility disorder disease. It is reported that the long-term effect of fully coated anti-reflux metal stent (FCARMS) implantation is satisfactory. Operated by a skilled and experienced endoscopist, the effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) treatment is equivalent to that of surgical myotomy. So far, there is still few evidence to prove FCARMS implantation or POEM which is better for achalasia. The choice of treatment for achalasia is still controversial. The aim of this study is to find a more suitable therapy for achalasia by comparing the efficacy of FCARMS implantation and POEM. METHODS: A propensity score (PS) matching (1:2) was used in this retrospective cohort study. Data collected from consecutive patients of Achalasia, receiving FCARMS implantation or POEM therapy at the department of gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital from May 2007 to May 2018. According to their previous treatment, they are divided into two groups, FCARMS group and POEM group. Clinical efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 166 cases were collected, including 113 cases of FCARMS and 53 cases of POEM. By PS matching, 150 patients were enrolled (100 cases of FCARMS and 50 cases of POEM). By comparison, the FCARMS group has shorter operation time, shorter fasting time and lower hospitalization costs than the POEM group (p < 0.05). Common complications in the FCARMS group are nausea, vomiting, and stent shift. Repetitions of gastroscopy in the FCARMS group was more often, which were 3.8 ± 2.4 (vs 2.1 ± 1.8 of POEM) (p = 0.00 < 0.05) The 6-month remission rates of the FCARMS combination POEM group were 89% and 94%, respectively (p = 0.39), and the 2-year remission rates were 61% and 90%, respectively (p = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement is a cost-effective and safe treatment option for achalasia. The short-term effect (less than 6 months) of FCARMS is similar to that of POEM, the long-term effect (more than 2 years), POEM is better than FCARMS. HRMIIis most suitable for POEM treatment. It indicate that Patients can choose treatment methods according to their own conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9118839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91188392022-05-20 Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study Tang, Yu-fen Jin, Peng Tao, Yu-rong Xie, Hui Wang, Xin Yu, Dongliang Tang, Shan Sheng, Jian-qiu BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare primary esophageal motility disorder disease. It is reported that the long-term effect of fully coated anti-reflux metal stent (FCARMS) implantation is satisfactory. Operated by a skilled and experienced endoscopist, the effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) treatment is equivalent to that of surgical myotomy. So far, there is still few evidence to prove FCARMS implantation or POEM which is better for achalasia. The choice of treatment for achalasia is still controversial. The aim of this study is to find a more suitable therapy for achalasia by comparing the efficacy of FCARMS implantation and POEM. METHODS: A propensity score (PS) matching (1:2) was used in this retrospective cohort study. Data collected from consecutive patients of Achalasia, receiving FCARMS implantation or POEM therapy at the department of gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital from May 2007 to May 2018. According to their previous treatment, they are divided into two groups, FCARMS group and POEM group. Clinical efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 166 cases were collected, including 113 cases of FCARMS and 53 cases of POEM. By PS matching, 150 patients were enrolled (100 cases of FCARMS and 50 cases of POEM). By comparison, the FCARMS group has shorter operation time, shorter fasting time and lower hospitalization costs than the POEM group (p < 0.05). Common complications in the FCARMS group are nausea, vomiting, and stent shift. Repetitions of gastroscopy in the FCARMS group was more often, which were 3.8 ± 2.4 (vs 2.1 ± 1.8 of POEM) (p = 0.00 < 0.05) The 6-month remission rates of the FCARMS combination POEM group were 89% and 94%, respectively (p = 0.39), and the 2-year remission rates were 61% and 90%, respectively (p = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement is a cost-effective and safe treatment option for achalasia. The short-term effect (less than 6 months) of FCARMS is similar to that of POEM, the long-term effect (more than 2 years), POEM is better than FCARMS. HRMIIis most suitable for POEM treatment. It indicate that Patients can choose treatment methods according to their own conditions. BioMed Central 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9118839/ /pubmed/35585499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02282-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tang, Yu-fen
Jin, Peng
Tao, Yu-rong
Xie, Hui
Wang, Xin
Yu, Dongliang
Tang, Shan
Sheng, Jian-qiu
Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
title Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
title_full Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
title_short Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
title_sort comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02282-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tangyufen comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT jinpeng comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT taoyurong comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT xiehui comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT wangxin comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT yudongliang comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT tangshan comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy
AT shengjianqiu comparisonoffullycoatedantirefluxmetalstentingandperoralendoscopicmyotomyinpatientswithachalasiaapropensityscorematchedretrospectivestudy