Cargando…

Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)

INTRODUCTION: There is an existing gap between what people learned from theory and what they clinically practiced, as revealed in research studies in nursing. This gap is primarily due to identified barriers in utilizing the research findings in actual nursing practice. OBJECTIVE: To present a scien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabonete, Fritz Gerald V., Roxas, Rachel Edita O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35600005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23779608221091073
_version_ 1784710596985356288
author Jabonete, Fritz Gerald V.
Roxas, Rachel Edita O.
author_facet Jabonete, Fritz Gerald V.
Roxas, Rachel Edita O.
author_sort Jabonete, Fritz Gerald V.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is an existing gap between what people learned from theory and what they clinically practiced, as revealed in research studies in nursing. This gap is primarily due to identified barriers in utilizing the research findings in actual nursing practice. OBJECTIVE: To present a scientific mapping of the Scopus-indexed literature published from 2002 to 2021, which studied barriers to research utilization in nursing using the BARRIER scale. METHODS: This systematic review utilized bibliometric analysis. One hundred seventy-nine extracted literature from Scopus was manually reviewed, and the study included 53 documents for further analysis. RESULTS: Remarkably, almost three-fourths of the documents identified setting-related factors as the most common barrier to research utilization in nursing (n = 39, 73.58%). This is followed by presentation-related factors (n = 16.98%) and nurse-related factors (n = 5, 9.43%), respectively. Findings revealed that insufficient time at work in implementing new ideas was perceived as the top barrier in research utilization in nursing. CONCLUSION: It is crucial to determine the hindrances to the utilization of research findings. The results of this study establish the connection between research and evidence-based practice which stimulates in meeting the gap in the current nursing practice. Future studies must include research utilization studies that apply tools other than the BARRIER scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9118897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91188972022-05-20 Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021) Jabonete, Fritz Gerald V. Roxas, Rachel Edita O. SAGE Open Nurs Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: There is an existing gap between what people learned from theory and what they clinically practiced, as revealed in research studies in nursing. This gap is primarily due to identified barriers in utilizing the research findings in actual nursing practice. OBJECTIVE: To present a scientific mapping of the Scopus-indexed literature published from 2002 to 2021, which studied barriers to research utilization in nursing using the BARRIER scale. METHODS: This systematic review utilized bibliometric analysis. One hundred seventy-nine extracted literature from Scopus was manually reviewed, and the study included 53 documents for further analysis. RESULTS: Remarkably, almost three-fourths of the documents identified setting-related factors as the most common barrier to research utilization in nursing (n = 39, 73.58%). This is followed by presentation-related factors (n = 16.98%) and nurse-related factors (n = 5, 9.43%), respectively. Findings revealed that insufficient time at work in implementing new ideas was perceived as the top barrier in research utilization in nursing. CONCLUSION: It is crucial to determine the hindrances to the utilization of research findings. The results of this study establish the connection between research and evidence-based practice which stimulates in meeting the gap in the current nursing practice. Future studies must include research utilization studies that apply tools other than the BARRIER scale. SAGE Publications 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9118897/ /pubmed/35600005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23779608221091073 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Jabonete, Fritz Gerald V.
Roxas, Rachel Edita O.
Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)
title Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)
title_full Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)
title_fullStr Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)
title_short Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002–2021)
title_sort barriers to research utilization in nursing: a systematic review (2002–2021)
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35600005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23779608221091073
work_keys_str_mv AT jabonetefritzgeraldv barrierstoresearchutilizationinnursingasystematicreview20022021
AT roxasracheleditao barrierstoresearchutilizationinnursingasystematicreview20022021