Cargando…

A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items

Recent work on reliability coefficients has largely focused on continuous items, including critiques of Cronbach’s alpha. Although two new model-based reliability coefficients have been proposed for dichotomous items (Dimitrov, 2003a,b; Green & Yang, 2009a), these approaches have yet to be compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Béland, Sébastien, Falk, Carl F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01466216221084210
_version_ 1784710603364892672
author Béland, Sébastien
Falk, Carl F.
author_facet Béland, Sébastien
Falk, Carl F.
author_sort Béland, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description Recent work on reliability coefficients has largely focused on continuous items, including critiques of Cronbach’s alpha. Although two new model-based reliability coefficients have been proposed for dichotomous items (Dimitrov, 2003a,b; Green & Yang, 2009a), these approaches have yet to be compared to each other or other popular estimates of reliability such as omega, alpha, and the greatest lower bound. We seek computational improvements to one of these model-based reliability coefficients and, in addition, conduct initial Monte Carlo simulations to compare coefficients using dichotomous data. Our results suggest that such improvements to the model-based approach are warranted, while model-based approaches were generally superior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9118929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91189292022-05-20 A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items Béland, Sébastien Falk, Carl F. Appl Psychol Meas Articles Recent work on reliability coefficients has largely focused on continuous items, including critiques of Cronbach’s alpha. Although two new model-based reliability coefficients have been proposed for dichotomous items (Dimitrov, 2003a,b; Green & Yang, 2009a), these approaches have yet to be compared to each other or other popular estimates of reliability such as omega, alpha, and the greatest lower bound. We seek computational improvements to one of these model-based reliability coefficients and, in addition, conduct initial Monte Carlo simulations to compare coefficients using dichotomous data. Our results suggest that such improvements to the model-based approach are warranted, while model-based approaches were generally superior. SAGE Publications 2022-04-14 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9118929/ /pubmed/35601261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01466216221084210 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Béland, Sébastien
Falk, Carl F.
A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items
title A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items
title_full A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items
title_fullStr A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items
title_short A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items
title_sort comparison of modern and popular approaches to calculating reliability for dichotomously scored items
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01466216221084210
work_keys_str_mv AT belandsebastien acomparisonofmodernandpopularapproachestocalculatingreliabilityfordichotomouslyscoreditems
AT falkcarlf acomparisonofmodernandpopularapproachestocalculatingreliabilityfordichotomouslyscoreditems
AT belandsebastien comparisonofmodernandpopularapproachestocalculatingreliabilityfordichotomouslyscoreditems
AT falkcarlf comparisonofmodernandpopularapproachestocalculatingreliabilityfordichotomouslyscoreditems