Cargando…
Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care
BACKGROUND: Oncology telemedicine was implemented rapidly after COVID‐19. We examined multilevel correlates and outcomes of telemedicine use for patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for cancer. METHODS: Upon implementation of a telemedicine platform at a comprehensive cancer center, we analyzed 468...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4555 |
_version_ | 1784710684720758784 |
---|---|
author | De, Brian Fu, Shuangshuang Chen, Ying‐Shiuan Das, Prajnan Ku, Kimberly Maroongroge, Sean Woodhouse, Kristina D. Hoffman, Karen E. Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu Reed, Valerie K. Chen, Aileen B. Koong, Albert C. Smith, Benjamin D. Smith, Grace L. |
author_facet | De, Brian Fu, Shuangshuang Chen, Ying‐Shiuan Das, Prajnan Ku, Kimberly Maroongroge, Sean Woodhouse, Kristina D. Hoffman, Karen E. Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu Reed, Valerie K. Chen, Aileen B. Koong, Albert C. Smith, Benjamin D. Smith, Grace L. |
author_sort | De, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oncology telemedicine was implemented rapidly after COVID‐19. We examined multilevel correlates and outcomes of telemedicine use for patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for cancer. METHODS: Upon implementation of a telemedicine platform at a comprehensive cancer center, we analyzed 468 consecutive patient RT courses from March 16, 2020 to June 1, 2020. Patients were categorized as using telemedicine during ≥1 weekly oncologist visits versus in‐person oncologist management only. Temporal trends were evaluated with Cochran‐Armitage tests; chi‐squared test and multilevel multivariable logistic models identified correlates of use and outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 33% used telemedicine versus 67% in‐person only oncologist management. Temporal trends (p (trend) < 0.001) correlated with policy changes: uptake was rapid after local social‐distancing restrictions, reaching peak use (35% of visits) within 4 weeks of implementation. Use declined to 15% after national “Opening Up America Again” guidelines. In the multilevel model, patients more likely to use telemedicine were White non‐Hispanic versus Black or Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] = 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–4.72; p = 0.04) or receiving ≥6 fractions of RT versus 1–5 fractions (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.29–8.80; p < 0.001). Model intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated 43% utilization variation was physician‐level driven. Treatment toxicities and 30‐day emergency visits or unplanned hospitalizations did not differ for patients using versus not using telemedicine (p > 0.05, all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Though toxicities were similar with telemedicine oncology management, there remained lower uptake among non‐White patients. Continuing strategies for oncology telemedicine implementation should address multilevel patient, physician, and policy factors to optimize telemedicine's potential to surmount—and not exacerbate—barriers to quality cancer care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9119354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91193542022-05-21 Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care De, Brian Fu, Shuangshuang Chen, Ying‐Shiuan Das, Prajnan Ku, Kimberly Maroongroge, Sean Woodhouse, Kristina D. Hoffman, Karen E. Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu Reed, Valerie K. Chen, Aileen B. Koong, Albert C. Smith, Benjamin D. Smith, Grace L. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Oncology telemedicine was implemented rapidly after COVID‐19. We examined multilevel correlates and outcomes of telemedicine use for patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for cancer. METHODS: Upon implementation of a telemedicine platform at a comprehensive cancer center, we analyzed 468 consecutive patient RT courses from March 16, 2020 to June 1, 2020. Patients were categorized as using telemedicine during ≥1 weekly oncologist visits versus in‐person oncologist management only. Temporal trends were evaluated with Cochran‐Armitage tests; chi‐squared test and multilevel multivariable logistic models identified correlates of use and outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 33% used telemedicine versus 67% in‐person only oncologist management. Temporal trends (p (trend) < 0.001) correlated with policy changes: uptake was rapid after local social‐distancing restrictions, reaching peak use (35% of visits) within 4 weeks of implementation. Use declined to 15% after national “Opening Up America Again” guidelines. In the multilevel model, patients more likely to use telemedicine were White non‐Hispanic versus Black or Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] = 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–4.72; p = 0.04) or receiving ≥6 fractions of RT versus 1–5 fractions (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.29–8.80; p < 0.001). Model intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated 43% utilization variation was physician‐level driven. Treatment toxicities and 30‐day emergency visits or unplanned hospitalizations did not differ for patients using versus not using telemedicine (p > 0.05, all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Though toxicities were similar with telemedicine oncology management, there remained lower uptake among non‐White patients. Continuing strategies for oncology telemedicine implementation should address multilevel patient, physician, and policy factors to optimize telemedicine's potential to surmount—and not exacerbate—barriers to quality cancer care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9119354/ /pubmed/35297210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4555 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES De, Brian Fu, Shuangshuang Chen, Ying‐Shiuan Das, Prajnan Ku, Kimberly Maroongroge, Sean Woodhouse, Kristina D. Hoffman, Karen E. Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu Reed, Valerie K. Chen, Aileen B. Koong, Albert C. Smith, Benjamin D. Smith, Grace L. Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
title | Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
title_full | Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
title_fullStr | Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
title_short | Patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
title_sort | patient, physician, and policy factors underlying variation in use of telemedicine for radiation oncology cancer care |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debrian patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT fushuangshuang patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT chenyingshiuan patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT dasprajnan patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT kukimberly patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT maroongrogesean patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT woodhousekristinad patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT hoffmankarene patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT nguyenquynhnhu patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT reedvaleriek patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT chenaileenb patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT koongalbertc patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT smithbenjamind patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare AT smithgracel patientphysicianandpolicyfactorsunderlyingvariationinuseoftelemedicineforradiationoncologycancercare |