Cargando…

Evaluation of impact of posterior phakic IOL implantation on biometry and effectiveness of concomitant use of anterior segment OCT on IOL power calculation for cataract surgery

To evaluate the effects of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation on the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and subsequently to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) against biometric changes. SETTING: Masayuki Ouchi Eye Cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ouchi, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34486576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000811
Descripción
Sumario:To evaluate the effects of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation on the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and subsequently to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) against biometric changes. SETTING: Masayuki Ouchi Eye Clinic, Kyoto, Japan. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive case series. METHODS: 100 patients (100 eyes) who underwent pIOL implantation were enrolled. In each eye, biometry was performed using partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and AS-OCT. Pre-pIOL and post-pIOL implantation IOL power calculation using SRK/T (S), Haigis (H), and Barret Universal II (B) formulas was compared. RESULTS: 100 patients (100 eyes) were included. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was significantly shorter at post-pIOL implantation for both PCI (P < .001) and AS-OCT (P = .05). When using PCI, the crystalline lens surface was misidentified in 75% of eyes, and in these eyes, the ACD difference between pre-pIOL and post-pIOL implantation exceeded that with both PCI and AS-OCT. The estimated IOL power was significantly lower at post-pIOL implantation according to the H and B formulas (both P < .001) but remained unchanged by the S formula. However, no difference was observed when AS-OCT–derived ACD and lens thickness (LT) values were introduced in the H (P = .16) and B (P = .55) formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Misidentification of the lens surface occurs in many pIOL-implanted eyes with PCI measurements and could influence the power calculation with H and B formulas while leaving the S formula unaffected. AS-OCT–derived ACD and LT value substitution is recommended for H and B formulas.