Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample

BACKGROUND: Despite reliable evidence-based research supporting the COVID-19 vaccines, population-wide confidence and trust remain limited. We sought to expand prior knowledge about COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, while determining which population groups are at greatest risk for not getting a vaccine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osuji, Vitalis C., Galante, Eric M., Mischoulon, David, Slaven, James E., Maupome, Gerardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35587947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268784
_version_ 1784710724553015296
author Osuji, Vitalis C.
Galante, Eric M.
Mischoulon, David
Slaven, James E.
Maupome, Gerardo
author_facet Osuji, Vitalis C.
Galante, Eric M.
Mischoulon, David
Slaven, James E.
Maupome, Gerardo
author_sort Osuji, Vitalis C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite reliable evidence-based research supporting the COVID-19 vaccines, population-wide confidence and trust remain limited. We sought to expand prior knowledge about COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, while determining which population groups are at greatest risk for not getting a vaccine. METHODS: Study participants in the U.S. (79% female, median age group 46–60 years) were recruited through an online Qualtrics survey distributed as a Facebook advertisement from 3/19/21–4/30/21. We assumed that every participant is at risk of COVID-19 infection and should be able to get the vaccine with proper access. Bivariate and multivariable models were performed. Collinearity between variables was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2,626 responses were generated and 2,259 were included in data analysis. According to our multivariate model analysis, vaccines were perceived as safe by those who had or planned to obtain full vaccination (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval) = 40.0 (19.0, 84.2); p< 0.0001) and those who indicated trust in science (aOR = 10.5 (5.1, 21.8); p< 0.0001); vaccines were perceived as not safe by those who self-identified as Republicans vs. self-identified Democrats (aOR = 0.2 (0.1, 0.5); p = 0.0020) and those with high school or lower education (aOR = 0.2 (0.1, 0.4); p = 0.0007). Similarly, according to our multivariate model analysis, the following groups were most likely to reject vaccination based on belief in vaccinations: those with lower income (aOR = 0.8 (0.6, 0.9); p = 0.0106), those who do not know anyone who had been vaccinated (aOR = 0.1 (0.1, 0.4); p< 0.0001), those who are unwilling to get vaccinated even if family and friends had done so (aOR = 0.1 (<0.1, 0.2); p< 0.0001), those who did not trust science (aOR < 0.1 (<0.1, 0.1); p< 0.0001), those who believe that vaccination was unnecessary if others had already been vaccinated (aOR = 2.8 (1.5, 5.1); p = 0.0007), and those who indicate refusal to vaccinate to help others (aOR = 0.1 (0.1, 0.2); p< 0.0001). An alpha of p<0.05 was used for all tests. CONCLUSION: Level of education and partisanship, but not race/ethnicity, were the most likely factors associated with vaccine hesitancy or likelihood to vaccinate. Also, low vaccination rates among underrepresented minorities may be due to distrust for healthcare industries. Population sub-groups less likely to be vaccinated and/or receptive to vaccines should be targeted for vaccine education and incentives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9119541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91195412022-05-20 COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample Osuji, Vitalis C. Galante, Eric M. Mischoulon, David Slaven, James E. Maupome, Gerardo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite reliable evidence-based research supporting the COVID-19 vaccines, population-wide confidence and trust remain limited. We sought to expand prior knowledge about COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, while determining which population groups are at greatest risk for not getting a vaccine. METHODS: Study participants in the U.S. (79% female, median age group 46–60 years) were recruited through an online Qualtrics survey distributed as a Facebook advertisement from 3/19/21–4/30/21. We assumed that every participant is at risk of COVID-19 infection and should be able to get the vaccine with proper access. Bivariate and multivariable models were performed. Collinearity between variables was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2,626 responses were generated and 2,259 were included in data analysis. According to our multivariate model analysis, vaccines were perceived as safe by those who had or planned to obtain full vaccination (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval) = 40.0 (19.0, 84.2); p< 0.0001) and those who indicated trust in science (aOR = 10.5 (5.1, 21.8); p< 0.0001); vaccines were perceived as not safe by those who self-identified as Republicans vs. self-identified Democrats (aOR = 0.2 (0.1, 0.5); p = 0.0020) and those with high school or lower education (aOR = 0.2 (0.1, 0.4); p = 0.0007). Similarly, according to our multivariate model analysis, the following groups were most likely to reject vaccination based on belief in vaccinations: those with lower income (aOR = 0.8 (0.6, 0.9); p = 0.0106), those who do not know anyone who had been vaccinated (aOR = 0.1 (0.1, 0.4); p< 0.0001), those who are unwilling to get vaccinated even if family and friends had done so (aOR = 0.1 (<0.1, 0.2); p< 0.0001), those who did not trust science (aOR < 0.1 (<0.1, 0.1); p< 0.0001), those who believe that vaccination was unnecessary if others had already been vaccinated (aOR = 2.8 (1.5, 5.1); p = 0.0007), and those who indicate refusal to vaccinate to help others (aOR = 0.1 (0.1, 0.2); p< 0.0001). An alpha of p<0.05 was used for all tests. CONCLUSION: Level of education and partisanship, but not race/ethnicity, were the most likely factors associated with vaccine hesitancy or likelihood to vaccinate. Also, low vaccination rates among underrepresented minorities may be due to distrust for healthcare industries. Population sub-groups less likely to be vaccinated and/or receptive to vaccines should be targeted for vaccine education and incentives. Public Library of Science 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9119541/ /pubmed/35587947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268784 Text en © 2022 Osuji et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Osuji, Vitalis C.
Galante, Eric M.
Mischoulon, David
Slaven, James E.
Maupome, Gerardo
COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample
title COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample
title_full COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample
title_short COVID-19 vaccine: A 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a U.S. sample
title_sort covid-19 vaccine: a 2021 analysis of perceptions on vaccine safety and promise in a u.s. sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35587947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268784
work_keys_str_mv AT osujivitalisc covid19vaccinea2021analysisofperceptionsonvaccinesafetyandpromiseinaussample
AT galanteericm covid19vaccinea2021analysisofperceptionsonvaccinesafetyandpromiseinaussample
AT mischoulondavid covid19vaccinea2021analysisofperceptionsonvaccinesafetyandpromiseinaussample
AT slavenjamese covid19vaccinea2021analysisofperceptionsonvaccinesafetyandpromiseinaussample
AT maupomegerardo covid19vaccinea2021analysisofperceptionsonvaccinesafetyandpromiseinaussample