Cargando…

Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial

PURPOSE: CHHiP is a randomized trial evaluating moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Of all participants, 97% of them had concurrent short-course hormone therapy (HT), either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LHRHa) or 150 mg of bicalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tree, Alison, Griffin, Clare, Syndikus, Isabel, Birtle, Alison, Choudhury, Ananya, Graham, John, Ferguson, Catherine, Khoo, Vincent, Malik, Zafar, O'Sullivan, Joe, Panades, Miguel, Parker, Chris, Rimmer, Yvonne, Scrase, Christopher, Staffurth, John, Dearnaley, David, Hall, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.160
_version_ 1784710746766049280
author Tree, Alison
Griffin, Clare
Syndikus, Isabel
Birtle, Alison
Choudhury, Ananya
Graham, John
Ferguson, Catherine
Khoo, Vincent
Malik, Zafar
O'Sullivan, Joe
Panades, Miguel
Parker, Chris
Rimmer, Yvonne
Scrase, Christopher
Staffurth, John
Dearnaley, David
Hall, Emma
author_facet Tree, Alison
Griffin, Clare
Syndikus, Isabel
Birtle, Alison
Choudhury, Ananya
Graham, John
Ferguson, Catherine
Khoo, Vincent
Malik, Zafar
O'Sullivan, Joe
Panades, Miguel
Parker, Chris
Rimmer, Yvonne
Scrase, Christopher
Staffurth, John
Dearnaley, David
Hall, Emma
author_sort Tree, Alison
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: CHHiP is a randomized trial evaluating moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Of all participants, 97% of them had concurrent short-course hormone therapy (HT), either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LHRHa) or 150 mg of bicalutamide daily. This exploratory analysis compares efficacy and side effects in a nonrandomized comparison. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In our study, 2700 patients received LHRHa and 403 received bicalutamide. The primary endpoint was biochemical/clinical failure. Groups were compared with Cox regression adjusted for various prognostic factors and stratified by radiation therapy dose. A key secondary endpoint was erectile dysfunction (ED) assessed by clinicians (using scores from Late Effects on Normal Tissues: Subjective/Objective/Management [LENT-SOM] subjective erectile function for vaginal penetration) and patients (single items within the University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index [UCLA PCI] and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-50 questionnaires) at 2 years and compared between HT regimens by χ(2) trend test. RESULTS: Bicalutamide patients were significantly younger (median 67 vs 69 years LHRHa). Median follow-up was 9.3 years. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical failure with an adjusted hazard ratio or 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.23; P = .8). At 2 years, grade ≥2 LENT-SOM ED was reported in significantly more LHRHa patients (313 out of 590; 53%) versus bicalutamide (17 out of 68; 25%) (P < .0001). There were no differences in ED seen with UCLA-PCI and EPIC-50 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized comparison, there was no evidence of a difference in efficacy according to type of HT received. Bicalutamide preserved clinician assessed (LENT-SOM) erectile function at 2 years but patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9119688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier, Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91196882022-06-14 Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial Tree, Alison Griffin, Clare Syndikus, Isabel Birtle, Alison Choudhury, Ananya Graham, John Ferguson, Catherine Khoo, Vincent Malik, Zafar O'Sullivan, Joe Panades, Miguel Parker, Chris Rimmer, Yvonne Scrase, Christopher Staffurth, John Dearnaley, David Hall, Emma Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: CHHiP is a randomized trial evaluating moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Of all participants, 97% of them had concurrent short-course hormone therapy (HT), either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LHRHa) or 150 mg of bicalutamide daily. This exploratory analysis compares efficacy and side effects in a nonrandomized comparison. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In our study, 2700 patients received LHRHa and 403 received bicalutamide. The primary endpoint was biochemical/clinical failure. Groups were compared with Cox regression adjusted for various prognostic factors and stratified by radiation therapy dose. A key secondary endpoint was erectile dysfunction (ED) assessed by clinicians (using scores from Late Effects on Normal Tissues: Subjective/Objective/Management [LENT-SOM] subjective erectile function for vaginal penetration) and patients (single items within the University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index [UCLA PCI] and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-50 questionnaires) at 2 years and compared between HT regimens by χ(2) trend test. RESULTS: Bicalutamide patients were significantly younger (median 67 vs 69 years LHRHa). Median follow-up was 9.3 years. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical failure with an adjusted hazard ratio or 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.23; P = .8). At 2 years, grade ≥2 LENT-SOM ED was reported in significantly more LHRHa patients (313 out of 590; 53%) versus bicalutamide (17 out of 68; 25%) (P < .0001). There were no differences in ED seen with UCLA-PCI and EPIC-50 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized comparison, there was no evidence of a difference in efficacy according to type of HT received. Bicalutamide preserved clinician assessed (LENT-SOM) erectile function at 2 years but patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups. Elsevier, Inc 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9119688/ /pubmed/35017008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.160 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Tree, Alison
Griffin, Clare
Syndikus, Isabel
Birtle, Alison
Choudhury, Ananya
Graham, John
Ferguson, Catherine
Khoo, Vincent
Malik, Zafar
O'Sullivan, Joe
Panades, Miguel
Parker, Chris
Rimmer, Yvonne
Scrase, Christopher
Staffurth, John
Dearnaley, David
Hall, Emma
Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial
title Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial
title_full Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial
title_fullStr Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial
title_full_unstemmed Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial
title_short Nonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial
title_sort nonrandomized comparison of efficacy and side effects of bicalutamide compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (lhrh) analogs in combination with radiation therapy in the chhip trial
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.160
work_keys_str_mv AT treealison nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT griffinclare nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT syndikusisabel nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT birtlealison nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT choudhuryananya nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT grahamjohn nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT fergusoncatherine nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT khoovincent nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT malikzafar nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT osullivanjoe nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT panadesmiguel nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT parkerchris nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT rimmeryvonne nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT scrasechristopher nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT staffurthjohn nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT dearnaleydavid nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT hallemma nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial
AT nonrandomizedcomparisonofefficacyandsideeffectsofbicalutamidecomparedwithluteinizinghormonereleasinghormonelhrhanalogsincombinationwithradiationtherapyinthechhiptrial